Criminal Courts

In the courts, the guilt or innocence of the suspect is determined. In most cases in court evidence is presented to the judge and jury to see if the defendant/ suspects pleads guilty or not guilty. A deficiency in the criminal justice policy can also be the courts systems. It is known that a low percentage of offenses someone results in going to prison. Prosecutors, judges and even police officers use discretion to decide which cases are pushed further into the criminal justice system and which ones are taken out.

Prosecutors have a big responsibility within the criminal justice system. They act as the legal representatives of the government when cases are filed against people who violated the law. It is essential for prosecutors to ensure that the evidence is sufficient before they bring the case

Across the world there are many different types of criminal justice systems to keep and maintain order and peace or the social code of conduct, otherwise known as the law of the land. The criminal justice system tries to deter individuals from disrupting the peace and order of society by educating their citizens on the consequences and punishments for failing to abide by the law. The criminal justice system can be categorized in three main parts; policing where the investigation is held, the courts where judgment is made, and corrections where the type of punishment is served.

The courtroom workgroup consists of the participants that work for the court. The workgroup is composed of the judge, prosecuting attorneys, defense attorneys, public defenders, and others

I observed court operations at the Plantation Key Government Center in Tavernier, Florida twice: on October 7th and November 4th. I observed Chief Circuit Judge Carlos Garcia in courtroom A. The courthouse is located in the 16th Judicial Circuit of Florida and it’s a state trial court with general jurisdiction. The first visit was cut short, in part because it was a lighter criminal day than planned, but also I was flabbergasted by the lack of professionalism that was present in the Florida Keys courtroom. I’m not sure if it’s a “court in Paradise” problem, or something that is observed at other courtrooms, however, I’m disappointed in what I saw. Lack of professionalism was evident during both visits from the actors and their actions.

In this stage, a member of the district attorney’s office would take over the case from a prosecution standpoint. Additionally, the defendant’s lawyer will now be involved with the future events of the case. It is during the judicial stage that the case can be dealt with via plea deals, guilty plea, pretrial diversion, or retirement of charges. The results of this particular stage dictate the future direction of the incident such as a preliminary hearing, grand jury indictment, and circuit court trial (Bohm & Haley, 2014). Should there be a trail and the suspect is found not guilty, the suspect is now free to go. On the other hand, should the verdict of the trial result in a guilty verdict the accused is now sentenced to either probation, time served, community service, jail or correctional facility time. Furthermore, there is an appellate process that a convicted individual can request to file (The Criminal Justice Process,

Most criminal and civil cases are heard in a court room without a jury. Once the case has been heard, the appointed judge with rule a verdict and impose a sentence on the offender. A judge is responsible for ensuring all parties follow the rules of the court. They

In the american court room there are several people involved. Some of the most important and lawful figures include: the judge, who is the main authority and the one responsible for justice. The prosecuting attorney, responsible for presenting the case against the defendant. The defense counsel, who is in

When criminal offenders get arrested, they are than booked into custody until the trial proceedings are over with. Unlike the criminal cases that are displayed on national television, an offender must undergo steps at a time for a criminal trial. The televised version of a criminal trial will have one thinking that it works that fast and it don’t. Each process that the defendant would go through takes months or even years. The nature of the crime as well as whom the person is and their past convictions. It takes time and lots of money to take cases to trial, the need to have a prosecutor, defense attorney, possible juror’s, and a judge. This overview, will define what a criminal trial is, the specific parties that are involved with the criminal process, and will explain the process in detail.

The purpose of this paper is to make the reader aware about the significance of the history of judicial system prevailing within the premises of United States. This paper intends to explore the Court System of United States. The major historical developments in the courts of United States will be discussed. Moreover, the rationale of the dual court system of the United States will be outlined. This paper will also explore the correlation between the historical developments and the dual court system of the United States.

Being charged with a crime is one thing, but the defense you choose is an entirely different ball game. “In the field of criminal law, there are variations of situations that will tend to contradict elements of a crime, known as a defense”. When someone is charged with a crime the kind of defense that they choose could in the end determine their destiny with the case. The criminal defense a person chooses to use will depend on the crime they are charged with and the evidence they have at their disposal. “Whether a person has a federal criminal attorney, a state criminal attorney, or a public defender, a defense strategy should always be discussed before they enter the court room”. There is a variety of defenses that exist in our criminal justice system. In this essay I will be taking a close look at two different cases that have pleaded two different types of criminal defenses. I will take a look at the nature and types of defenses used in the cases and what evidence was used to help demonstrate that defense. I will also describe how justification and excuse played a role in the cases and lastly I will be describing the outcome of each case.

After a serious crime has been committed, a suspect with reasonable “probable cause” is arrested and booked into the county jail. This begins the re-occurring cycle of the legal system process. Over the course of several months (sometimes years) a prosecutor will present physical evidence and/or witnesses to prove guilt. An appointed defense attorney representing the suspect will attempt to dispute and discredit the prosecutor’s evidence to prove innocence. Once both sides have exhausted their resources, the accused will stand before a judge. If the judge determines the accused party is guilty, a prison sentence will be issued.

In this, the defendant typically agrees to plead guilty in exchange for the prosecutor recommending a reduced sentence or reducing the severity of the charge made.

The criminal justice system is composed of three major institutions which process a case from inception, through trial, to punishment. In the United States, the criminal justice system will always begin with the reporting or the direct observation of the crime. A case requires law enforcement officials to investigate the crime or someone that has seen the crime or the damage after the fact. If the investigation produces enough evidence to build the case and substantiate probable cause for an arrest, then this will lead to an arrest. The suspect will be booked into a correction facility. After booking, the prosecution may choose to continue with the charge or file it in the court for further processing. At this stage, the court will be presented

The U.S. Constitution is supported by a dual court system in which the power is shared between the state and the federal governments. Most criminal cases are tried in state court, whereas, federal crimes are tried in federal courts. Both courts have jurisdiction, although federal courts are limited to the cases heard. The state offers a broad capability to encompass more cases and averages 30,000,000 cases filed, whereas, the federal courts see a mere 1,000,000 cases (findlaw). State and federal governments are mutual partners in the objective to protect the rights of citizens and the Constitution.