Criminal Justice Chapter 3 Analysis

In the beginning of chapter one, the Supreme Court ruled in the case Florida v. J.L, a police officer may not search individuals based merely on an anonymous tip. The anonymous tip received was that a black man standing at a bus stop was carrying a concealed firearm. Out of the three black men at the bus stop, they searched the man wearing the plaid shirt, as described in the tip. Although public safety issues were recognized, the conviction was overturned. This unlawful search violated the Fourth Amendment of the Constitution, which states, in simpler terms, that the police cannot search an individual or take their property without probable cause.

This first week the assignment was to Define crime, its relationship to the law, and the two most common models of how society determines which acts are criminal, Describe the government structure as it applies to the criminal justice system, Identify choice theories and the their assumptions in regards to crime, Describe the components of the criminal justice system and the criminal justice process, Identify the goals of the criminal justice system.

I feel that this case was somewhat representative of what was discussed in the textbook. The forensics aspects of this case were generally different from the impression of forensics I received from reading the textbook. Despite this fact, I feel that the investigative techniques of this case were similar to what was discussed in the textbook, as well as what has been discussed during lecture.

To begin with, criminal justice is a system that is designed to maintain social control, which means it is a necessary aspect of every society since “Laws are the conditions under which independent and isolated men united to form a society” (Beccaria, 1764: 16). In order words, crime control deals with the methods that are taken by a society to reduce its crime. As a matter of fact, there are various crime control strategies from community policing to risk assessments. In addition to the different tactics for controlling crime, there are several theories that not only attempt to explain the causes of crime, but also outline different ways to handle offenders; for example, deterrence, rehabilitation, and even retribution.

The specific aims and purposes of criminal law is to punish criminals, and prevent people from becoming future criminals by using deterrence. “Having a criminal justice system that imposes liability and punishment for violations deter.” (Paul H. Robinson, John M. Darley, Does Criminal Law Deter? A Behavioural Science Investigation, Oxford Journal of Legal studies, volume 24, No. 2 (2004), pp. 173-205). Criminal law

Prisoners are citizens too. They may have committed a felony, but they are still citizens of their home country. Some people think prisoners should not have the right to vote, but many others think they should. About two million people in U.S. are in prison. All those people do not get to cast a vote in the election. They are not able to decide who runs the country they live in. Imagine not being able to have a say in our country. We are a democracy, which means everyone has the right to vote in our government. Prisoners should be allowed to vote because they still are citizens and still have

Fred is drunk and driving his dad’s car. Fred is a 21 year old student at Columbia College. Fred rams into a parked car at 10th and Rogers. Thinking no one saw him; Fred moves his car and parks it on an adjacent lot. He sprints to his dorm room in Miller Hall. A neighbor saw the wreck and Fred running to the dorm. Police are called and they arrive ten minutes after the wreck. The officers see several empty beer cans and a bottle of tequila (half full) in the front seat. The tags are traced to Fred’s dad, who is called by police. Dad says that Fred is a student at Columbia College. Police run Fred's record and determine that he has two prior DWIs within the past five years. The third DWI in 10 years is a felony. Police contact

We all do our best to protect what is ours, but how far will we go to do that and will it justify our reasons behind our actions? Whether it’s protecting our properties and possessions, or family or even ourselves, situations get out of hand and we are faced with making decisions that could change our lives and the lives of those around us. The tiniest detail can determine ones actions as justifiable or unjustifiable. For Don Luis Ceballos and Judy-Ann Laws Norman their actions of defense were unjustifiable according to a jury.

In the United States of America, there is a system referred to as the criminal justice system. This system assists in managing crime and helps to control society through rules and regulations. If these guidelines are disobeyed, there are consequences that follow. These consequences consist of being arrested by law enforcement, going to court to pay a fine or to be sentenced, and even going to jail or prison (Bohm & Haley, 2014).

Leaders of the criminal justice system need to think strategically. A challenge for public administration in the 21st century is to recognize the relevance of these

I attended a Criminal Justice Club meeting. We discussed what everyone would like to get out of the class and their careers in criminal justice they want to pursue. The club discussed setting up practice reenactments of doing the specific job. Some of the people wanted to be Criminal Profilers, Forensic, and Agents. I think this club would be good for me. The club would help me know if I want to pursue a degree in Criminal Justice. The club would also help me learn more about the Criminal side of careers in everyday

I am writing to you to describe the subject of my module four report. My report will be on Criminal Justice, because this is what I am currently majoring in. Over the last 2 years, I have learned that there are three very important components of the Criminal Justice system. Those three main components include: Law Enforcement, Courts, and Corrections. All of which work together to prevent and punish deviant behavior.

After reading the assigned chapters and viewing the videos, discuss in your essay why “legalistic” definition of crime is not sufficient to cover all criminal activities:

1. Q: In what ways have our historic roots affected the manner in which criminal investigations are conducted in the United States today?

Criminal law is the glitzy branch of law that everyone seems to know something about. Whether or not those beliefs are accurate is something entirely different. Thanks to television shows like Law and Order, Charlie’s Angels and as far back as Perry Mason we have been educated on the basics of criminal law. From the high profile first-degree murder to the less glamorous crime of forgery we have all had a simple legal training that makes everyone an arm-chair lawyer. As an experiment, I decided to ask 5 people to differentiate between homicide and murder. They all instantly agreed and wanted to share their knowledge on law. However, when I asked to explain the difference between homicide and murder (or if there was one) I got 5 different answers. Most of them were pretty close on one term or the other but there was no clear winning answer. I guess we can say that criminal law is like the high school cheerleader. Approachable, serves a purpose but not as easy as it appears. Learning terms in an “as seen on tv” fashion is an easy way to get people aware of and possibly interested in criminal law but as our professors always remind us, television law is for entertainment value only.