Criminal Justice : Law Office Bombing

On August 24, 2015 at approximately 6:40 pm. Officer responded to shots fird complaint in the North Mclemore and Lark Street area. Officer loacated two subjects that had been shot and two otheer subjects uninjured.One subject (Cedrick Person) had been fatally wounded from multiple gun shots. The other injured subject was his son (Marquis Person) had what appeared to be a single gunshot wound in the shoulder area. The shooting stemed from an altercation that occurred earilier that same day. After further investigationg the case, investigaters learned that Lakendrick Deberry was possibly the shooter in this incident. Arrest warrats were issued for Lakendrick Deberry for !st Degree Homicide, Attempted !st Degree Homicide and possessing a firearm

On May 23rd 1957, three police officers representing Cleveland Ohio came to the door of Miss Mapp’s residence with the suspicion of a bombing suspect hiding out in her home. Miss Mapp and her daughter lived in a two family two story home. Upon their arrival at the house the police knocked on the door and demanded entrance from Miss Mapp. However Miss Mapp didn’t open the door and instead asked them to provide a search warrant after she called her attorney. The officers advised their headquarters of the situation and established surveillance of the home over the next few hours. The officers once again sought entrance three hours later when they forced open one of the doors to the home and went inside. It was around this time that miss

2. Case Facts: On October 13, 1979, George Schnopps fatally shot his wife of 14 years. The victim and schnopps began having marital problems six months prior, when schnopps became suspicious that his wife was seeing another man. A few days prior to the incident, Schnopps threatened to make his wife suffer. On October 12, 1979 while at work asked a coworker to buy him a gun, telling the worker that he had been receiving threatening phone calls. Schnopps paid his coworker for the gun and ammunition. On the day of the incident, Schnopps told a neighbor he was going to call his wife and have her come pick up some things, and asked if them to keep the youngest child with her so he could talk to with his wife. When the wife went over Schnopps tried to convince his wife to stay with him, in response the wife made some vulgar comments which triggered Schnopps. He then shot her and then shot himself. Shortly after he called the neighbor and told her what had happened and she called the police. The defense offered evidence from friends and coworkers who noticed difference in Schnopps physical and emotional health after the victim had left him. The Commonwealth’s expert

Convicted for the murders of his wife and two kids, thirty-four years ago, Dr. MacDonald still endures the agony of being accused of killing his family. Even after twenty-four years of imprisonment and several unlawful court hearings, additional documentation continues to up hold Dr. MacDonald’s testimony.

Criminology is focused on the attempt to understand the meanings involved in social interaction. Theorists have tried to explain sociological behaviour by looking at the patterns created by individuals that commit crime. The August 2011 riots are pivotal in explaining criminological behaviour since official statistics show that 865 individuals were put in prison by the 9th September 2011 for offences related to the disorder between 6th and 9th August 2011. This is not to say that others were not involved, but that they have simply not been identified to date and may never be identified, however the evidence we do have about the recent riots gives us plenty to talk about. This essay will

These are the four little girls that had died in the bombing of The 16th street Baptist church. Their names were Addi Mae Collins, Cynthia Wesley, Carole Robertson, and Carol Denise.

At the crack of dawn on September 15, 1963, at approximately 10:22 a.m. an unexpected explosion happened at the Sixteenth Street Baptist Church in Birmingham, Alabama. This was one of the most drastic events to take place during the Civil Rights Movement. A $5,000 reward was put out if anyone was willing and able to find the people that did this drastic bombing.

The case that I decided to analyze is a criminal case, State Vs Stepp. Joshua Stepp was charged with first-degree murder as well as first-degree sexual assault of his ten-month-old step daughter Cheyenne Yarley. Stepp is an ex-military man who claims to suffer from PTSD. Stepp asks that the court charge him with second-degree murder on the account that he “was unable to perform the specific intent to kill” due to his PTSD.

On 08/23/2015, at approximately 1820 hours, Kevin NAJERA and Nicholas MERVA were driving on Main Street (SR924). They observed GUTIERREZ and APGAR walking north on Main Street. MERVA asked his brother NAJERA if they were the guys. MERVA and NAJERA pulled into the parking lot at the magisterial district court. NAJERA exited the vehicle and approached GUTIERREZ and APGAR in an attempt to retrieve his belongings. An altercation began between GUTIERREZ and NAJERA. NAJERA'S brother MERVA approached the two and pulled GUTIERREZ off of his brother. At this time APGAR pulled a large knife out of his pocket and said "back up niggy." APGAR began to provoke MERVA saying "box me" in an attempt to

On the early morning of Sunday, September 15th 1963 in Birmingham, Alabama four members of the KKK planted a minimum of 15 sticks of dynamite under the steps of the 16th Street Baptist church, close to the basement. At 10:22 a.m. the 16th Street Baptist Church received a phone call from an anonymous man who simply said “Three minutes,” before hanging up. Less than a minute of the call, the bombs exploded as there were five children present within the basement of the church. Out of the 5 children who were in the basement 4 of them died from the explosion 14 year old Addie Mae Collins, Carole Robertson, Cynthia Wesley, and 11 year old Carol Denise McNair. More than 20 other additional people were injured in the explosion, one of them being Sarah

Two men, who found a bomb planted in Manhattan, are being searched for by the law enforcement agencies. The two men took a duffel bag, after removing the explosive it contained. Investigators released images of the men, believing that the bag taken might have been an important piece of evidence. The authorities do not believe that the two men are related to Ahmad Khan Rahami, the person accused of setting off the bombs. “We have no reason to believe they’re connected” (Santora 1). The police commissioner said that the men are witnesses. As a matter of fact, several law enforcement officials suggested that when the men were jostling the bomb to get it out of the bag they may, unknowingly, caused it to deactivate. Mr. Rahami, during a shootout

- 3:45p.m. Newton County, GA police arrived that consisted of two police cars and four police officers in response to Mr. Kennedy call to 9/11 call. Mr. Kennedy met with the officers in the lobby. After the meeting with Mr. Kennedy, the police officers met with the GS and the HOD. The police informed them that Mr. Kennedy alleges that Ms. Champagne assaulted him and threaten him with a gun. The HOD and GS asked the officers where this alleged gun was, they stated that Mr. Kennedy reported that Ms. Champagne left the gun in her car. The police stated that they advised Mr. Kennedy that this was a internal matter and he could file a complaint in court if he wishes; additionally, that he could wear a camera to work. Police informed management (HOD and GS) that Mr. Kennedy accused Ms. Champagne of assaulting him and threating him with a gun. They also informed Ms. Narvil that they advised Mr. Kennedy of his right to file a Treatment Payment Operations (TPO); however, they express their concerns from their investigation that Ms. Champagne

Allen’s complaint was probably sufficiently pled to survive a motion to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, which dismisses complaints that fail to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. To decide this, the court will probably look at whether the nonconclusory allegations contain facts that if true, would plausible entitle Allen to relief under strict liability rather than negligence because Minkah’s explosives suggest an abnormally dangerous activity. To be sufficiently pled for strict liability, the nonconclusory facts in the complaint must not only allege damages but must plausibly show Minkah’s activity was abnormally dangerous by satisfying six elements: great risk of harm, risk of great harm, unpreventable risk, uncommon activity, inappropriate location and community value disproportionate to the risks. Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662 (2009). Indiana Harbor Belt R. Co. v. American Cyanamid Co., 916 F.2d 1174 (1990).

An example of this was the Haymarket bombing towards the Chicago police during the pace of events. The bombing’s hurt workers’ rights and limited the union use of mass strikes. The rally began peacefully in the evening of May 4. Spies, Albert Parson and Samuel Fielden spoke to the crowd which was estimated to be about 3000 persons. A home-made bomb with a brittle metal casing filled with dynamite and ignited by a fuse, was thrown into the path of the advancing police. Its fuse briefly sputtered, then the bomb exploded, killing policeman Mathias J. Degan with flying metal fragments and mortally wounding six other officers. The police assumed that an anarchist had thrown the bomb as part of a planned conspiracy; their problem was how to prove

About eight anarchists were convicted of conspiracy. They found evidence that shows that one of the anarchists could have built the bomb. The evidence also shows that none of them could have thrown the bomb. Seven of the eight were found guilty and were sentenced to death and one of them were sentenced to fifteen years in prison. One of the three that were sentenced to death committed suicide because they would rather be dead than to go to jail.