Criminal Justice Personal Statement Examples

Illegal immigrants have been a hot topic lately due to the popularity of this topic amongst the Republican Presidential Nominees, especially Donald Trump. These illegal immigrants bring various things to this country when they come. Some things are positive, such as a family simply seeking to find a better life, while some things are harmful to the United States, such as the amount of crime among illegal immigrants. In July 2015, the most recent estimate of illegal immigrants was 11.2 million. This same data shoes that 56 percent of all deportations last year were convicted criminals, which accounted for 177,960 individuals (Shoichet, 2015). Crime among illegal immigrants is a problem, and sanctuary cities, which are supposed to be a solution, may be making this problem worse.

A congress current event is the measures that the government wants to imply to sanctuary cities.’’ Legislation directed at sanctuary cities will likely contain defunding provisions, and attempt to establish more prescriptive immigration laws. Now the 115th Congress, both the Senate and House have each introduced anti-sanctuary city bills. On Jan. 3, 2017, Rep. Lou Barletta, R-Pa., introduced H.R.83’’ “Mobilizing Against Sanctuary Cities Act,” and on Jan. 10, 2017, Sen. Pat Toomey, R-Pa., introduced S.87 “A bill to ensure that state and local law enforcement may cooperate with federal officials to protect our communities from violent criminals and suspected terrorists who are illegally present in the United States.”

Imagine you have a bowl of M&M’s and you have the option to eat as many or as few as you want. However, for every 1,000 M&M’s in the bowl there is one that is poisoned. Your odds are still good! Just pray you don’t get that one M&M that can end your life. While most would use common sense and say that eating the M&M’s are too risky, this game of life and death occurs when we allow illegal immigrants to stay in America. Sanctuary Cities are notorious for taking this risk and they have started seeing the result of eating the wrong M&M.

With important issues occurring every hour these days, more questions are being asked with them. One of those issues is Sanctuary Cities. A Sanctuary city is a city in which State and Local government do not follow immigration policy and do not actively seek and deport undocumented immigrants. Some could find that this Local policy hurts all Americans. Some could find this a moral obligation as a citizen of the United States. But by any means this topics has major implications to President Trumps policies and Federalism. And with these cities becoming more mainstream, question are becoming more relevant to other parts of government. There are direct effects on issues like cities health program, fight against opioids, and other local

Our country was founded on immigration, but in recent decades the term ‘immigrant’ has been linked with turmoil. There has been great uncertainty within the American population of what to do about immigration reform, or if immigration is even a problem in our country. Arizona’s Scarred Generation by Fernanda Santos describes the chaotic changes taking place within most densely populated latin american states, mainly Arizona. Policies such as DACA have relieved some of this uncertainty within younger immigrant populations, especially latin americans growing up here who had no choice in being “undocumented” immigrants, but some laws such as SB 1070 ( a law allowing police to search latin american citizens based on their appearance), Proposition

An “Illegal Immigrant” is someone who avoids inspection and/or overstays the period of time given to them as a tourist, business person, or a visitor(Dictonary.com). Illegal Immigrants need Sanctuary cities and open borders, but in reality, Sanctuary cites do not need Illegal Immigrants, and open borders because they are very well populated. According to Daily Signal, a news organization for society, news editor Josh Siegel posted a chart of the top U.S cities with the highest illegal population. The current population census in the top four sanctuary cities that are listed below are: Los Angeles, 4,041,707 people(Grad), New York City 8,537,637 people(ny.gov), Chicago 2,720,546 people (United States Census Bureau), and lastly Seattle, 684,451(Schlosser). Los Angeles and New York City, both have the highest estimated illegal population, and population census. So, if they do not put some effort in by making immigrants follow the legal process to become a citizen in the United States, then ICE will come and start deporting illegals which could decline Los Angeles, and New York City’s population drastically. Well, actually most city administrators think it is politically correct to have Sanctuary cities regardless of the consequences are looming around because it is a political agenda that Democrats favor more than the Republicans. Illegal Immigration and the

Christina Littlefield reports that Juan Francisco Lopez-Sanchez, an undocumented immigrant, had seven felony convictions in the United States and had been deported from the country five times, yet the city of San Francisco declined to detain him for ICE officials and released him into the community. Sanctuary cities release criminals, like Lopez-Sanchez; consequently posing a threat to surrounding communities. According to Jessica Vaughan out 8,145 undocumented immigrants released from detention requests, 63% had previous criminal convictions. Sanctuary cities allow perilous immigrants among legal residents of the United States. These cities enable aliens to commit barbaric crimes, leave the country, and then come right back with no penalty. Of those previous criminal records, Vaughan reports 36.6% undocumented immigrants had felony charges and 23.4% had charges related to violence, assault, sexual abuse, weapons, or drug distribution. Rapist, drug dealers, and murderers are all threats to the community. Hostile immigrants deserve to be in jail, not harbored in Sanctuary

The history of the “sanctuary city” designation is vague in its origin and definition, the word sanctuary meant something to those refugees, and to a lot of congregations all over the country who provided them with shelter. As for today, the term has become charged and in some ways toxic. With hundreds of cities considered sanctuary jurisdictions, five states and 644 counties have policies limiting local law enforcement’s cooperation with federal

“Give me your tired, your poor, your huddled masses yearning to breathe free.” Perhaps these words written on Lady Liberty first inspired the creation of so called “sanctuary cities” in the United States. Sanctuary cities began in the 80’s as a network of churches and religious congregations that provided safe housing for refugees. Today, sanctuary cities have transformed from a small scale network to a larger social movement to fight xenophobia and bring the possibility of a normal life for undocumented people. Lately, the buzzword of “sanctuary cities” is on every politician's lips as Trump makes dramatic threats to cut federal funding from counties that continue this “sanctuary city” practice.

Cities such as San Francisco fail to cooperate when illegal immigrants are being released from prison by not contacting the Department of Homeland Security. This causes a threat to local residents because undocumented criminals that have been incarcerated are once again given the power to commit illegal crimes and harm U.S. citizens. In the article, the author emphasizes “ The American people “‘ are justifiably angry’” about these sanctuary policies that endanger them. They understand something that local officials don’t seem to care about” (Von Spakovsky). Jurisdictions that adopt “sanctuary policies” happen to think that the protection of illegal criminals is more important than the protection of legal U.S. residents.

Can sanctuary cities be effective in both the policing and protection of undocumented citizens and if so, how will they regulate the population in question? A main issue being displayed here is a lack of standardized regulations being set by sanctuary cities. Instead of setting a precedent of resisting government immigration policies, these efforts would better have spent towards setting up and promoting programs that assist illegal immigrants in becoming American citizens. This paper will look at articles regarding sanctuary cities from Slate, Vox and the Wall Street Journal and decide which has the strongest argument.

A San Francisco woman named Kate Steinle was murdered on July 1, 2015 by an illegal immigrant. He had been deported five times and previously convicted of seven other felonies. The story of Kate’s death made headline news all across America highlighting the need for Congress to reform laws that allow illegal immigrants in Sanctuary cities to remain in the United States after being deported. A Sanctuary city is a term given to a city in the United States that follows certain practices that protect illegal immigration. The undocumented immigrant from Mexico arrested for the death of Kathryn Steinle’s was Juan Francisco Lopez Sanchez, who had no motive for this senseless killing. Kate’s father told the media his daughter was fatally shot while

In the article “Sanctuary Cities Violate Law and Common Sense” (1-3) Robert Ehrlich writes that citizens of sanctuary cities are in danger and change is essential. First, Ehrlich accuses democrats of no longer being concerned with immigration law along with progressives being arrogant. Then the author urges citizens to not let Kate Steinle’s death be in vain. Furthermore, the author urges government to end support of sanctuary cities. The most interesting point Ehrlich presented was “it’s as though federal immigration law has been reduced to a discretionary set of suggestions” (Ehrlich 2). In conclusion, the author reveals that sanctuary cities need change by not only citizens but also government to prevent future casualties.

The article closes with a connection to more modern politics, and describes where the positive and neutral views of sanctuary cities took a turn for the worse. Sakuma presents the case of Kate Steinle: a woman shot by an undocumented immigrant with a long criminal history who wasn’t previously deported due to protection provided by sanctuary city policies. She explains that the presidential nominee at the time, Donald Trump, along with other conservative parties used this story as an example of the negative effects of allowing the existence of sanctuary cities. This brought attention to the controversy surrounding these cities since the 1980s, and helped Trump connect with the republican party by emphasizing his anti-illegal immigrant positions and raise his poll numbers. Trump and other politicians exploited this tragedy to prove a point

I. Introduction A. The object of study is to analyze the experiences of undocumented women through an intersectional lens. It is important in understanding the limitations of sanctuary cities and the unique experiences these women face in comparison to other populations. B. Thesis statement: Despite the rise of sanctuary cities and their promise for inclusivity and protection, undocumented women continue to face exclusion in urban spaces and limited access to urban rights due to their marginalized position in society. C.