Criminal Law: Examples of Victimless Crimes

I always felt that as long as the person is not harming someone else than he or she should do what they want. Victimless crimes block our pursuit to happiness. For instance, the drug war has been a proven failure. Marijuana has never killed anybody before, so why is that illegal? Marijuana is not the gateway drug; the drug dealer is the gateway. Suede (2012) states that we need prison reform, because 756 per 100,000 of our population are in jail for victimless crimes. Over 50 percent of our population is because of drug usage, which I agree. I am not saying that every drug must be legal, because some of it actually kills. However, we should focus on helping the individual, instead of just throwing them in a cage around real criminals. It all

Can a person be responsible for some ones death without killing them or if it’s not their intention?

New York Penal Law states that in order for someone to be guilty of first degree murder one must intend to cause the death of another person or third person, cause the death of another person or third person; and whether the killing happened pursuant to an agreement in expectation of anything of pecuniary value from the opposite party in return. N.Y. PENAL LAW § 125.27 (1)(a)(vi) (McKinney 2013). A person acts intentionally with respect to a result or to conduct described by a statute defining an offense when his conscious objective is to cause such result or to engage in such conduct N.Y. PENAL LAW § 15.05 (McKinney’s 1965) Although intent is a subjective mental state it can still be objectively proven by circumstantial evidence. With legally sufficient evidence the court will weigh the evidence against the circumstance itself and determine whether the decision is against the weight of the evidence. People v. Johnson, 20 A.D.3d 808, 811,812 (3d Dep’t 2003). Pecuniary compensation does not need to solely involve something that

A crime is a violation of established law, but not all crimes have a readily identifiable victim. A victimless crime is one where an act that violates an established law is committed, without leaving a victim behind; that is, there is no resulting damage to a person or property. In these cases, there is usually no victim because the illegal activity was consensually entered into. For this reason, victimless crimes are often called consensual crimes.

It can now and then be complicated to rationalize the wrongdoing of the illegal act being perform that is indicated as victimless, as a result in order for a crime to have been executed it is implied that another person ought to be harmed short of their consent, which does not happen in the aftermath of a victimless crime. Possession and carrying a firearm or the illegal obtainment of a firearm is undoubtedly a victimless crime. The possession of a firearm is a victimless crime since no individual is harmed in the process, no individual is complaining about the actions that occurred, because no victim is left behind. These transgressions are not typically recognized as victimless crimes since the belief is that guns kill people.

When the topic of being victimized is at discussion, it is almost taboo to place the blame of the unjust treatment on the behavior of the victim. However, based on several theories and theoretical perspectives explored in victimology, victimization could certainly be a consequence of the victim’s behavior. The Victim-Precipitation theories directly address this idea stating that the victim may provoke or contribute to the outcome of the crime. In this theory produced by theorist Von Hentig, he states that crime is created through social interaction where both sides contribute. Within this theory there are two separate ideas of precipitation, active and passive. Active precipitation is the concept that the victim provokes, threatens or even attacks first before becoming the victim. Passive precipitation on the other hand is the idea that the victim may display some characteristic that may threaten or encourage the offender. Even the negligence of the victim can be deemed as a contributing factor to becoming victimized. For example, a victim leaves their purse in plain sight of their passenger seat and does not bother to lock their car as they go inside of a department store. Upon returning to their car they realize their purse is gone. Although the victim did not actively provoke the crime, the victim played a role and may have influenced the offender.

The final one of the five categories is called no victimization, I really did not understand this to the fullest but I think it involves when no one can be blame for crime which weird to me. I guess what they are trying to explain here if two individual committing and illegal act which one would take the blame for it. For example illegal prostitution between two adults in gage into a sexual

There is conflict over the victim rights policies because one cannot define specifically what is the cause of victimization or who is or is not a victim. The six elements of U.S. political culture are individualism, privet property, contracts and laws, freedom, equality, and democracy. Individualism is defined as a form of responsibility and independence; privet property is a form of protection by the government whether it be through taxes land or must furthermore one must give up some up something to the government to get benefits and protection. Freedom is the same thing as liberty where absence of restraint takes place. Equality is where the same treatment is being given across the board. All the elements listed

Lastly, in some cases it is necessary to protect the public from those who commit crimes—particularly from those who do so persistently (Coyle).

I think that is a valid question. The truth is I am not sure there is a good answer to your question. There is not a victimless crime, and whether it is a murder, a fraud, a burglary, or a rape, etc. it should not matter what the crime is. We should not work any harder, or less hard just because of the crime classification. Each victim, no matter the crime, deserves our best efforts to investigate the crime.

A victimless crime is a term used to refer to actions that have been made illegal but which do not directly violate or threaten the rights of any other individual. It often involves consensual acts or solitary acts in which no other person is involved. Such acts would not lead to any person calling for help from the police. Therefore, many people will argue that drug dealing,use, and abuse is a victimless crime, but they are wrong. We have to ask ourselves what makes a crime a crime? We know that crime is an action or omission that constitutes an offense that may be prosecuted by the state and is punishable by law. However, it also consists of actions that cause harm. With harm, there are in fact victims, although the harm may not be directly implied to just one person, there still victims that are infected by the crime. With the topic of drugs , we have to examine the types of harm that this act inflicts. The three types of harm that is caused by drug dealing,use and abuse are individual, social and economic harm.

A victimless crime is defined as an incident or crime where there is no distinct victim <legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Victimless Crimes>. There are many different crimes that can be categorized as a Victimless Crime. Some of these crimes include Postitution, Drug use and Public Drunkines (Public Intoxication) <education-portal.com/.../victimless-crimes-definition-types-examples.html>. A lot of the crimes involve one complaining party, most likely the police officers or a unhappy customer out for some payback <www.encyclopedia.com/topic/Victimless_Crimes.aspx>.

Victimless crimes are simply defined as a crime having no victim. I believe the laws against victimless crimes are not direct threats to the privacy of individuals. On the contrary the laws help protect the existing right we have as individual and help assure a civilized society. In criminalizing certain acts, society makes a judgment that there can be no privacy interest in those acts. These acts of self abuse are destructive. These crimes erode the systems of ethics’ and morals in the fabric of our society. .

There are seven different elements of a crime and if a crime has been committed the crime must fit all seven of the elements, or it is not considered a crime. When determining if illegal drugs, prostitution, and gambling provided in these seven elements of crime categories (Bohm, & Haley, 2012). The first element which is harm is not always present in a crime because harm can be verbal and physical. The use of marijuana, prostitution, and gambling are committed by persons or individuals who are willing participants in these illegal acts. These crimes are considered victimless crimes and do not fall within the seven elements of a crime category (Bohm, & Haley, 2012). These three crimes do not harm anyone except themselves even though they are

In her essay “The Joys and Perils of Victimhood,” (1999) Ian Buruma argued that the “survival complex” no longer worked on the national level, but on the individual and communal ones. Thanks to the breaking down of national, ideological and racial boundaries in the cosmopolitan world, individuals were prompted to find new means of identity formation. In this context, victimhood as the ownmost unshared experience drew survivors together as a community. For Buruma, the flourish of autobiographical writings was not “bearing witness or testifying” history, but symptomized its collapse: while history was believed as merely constructed opinions, feeling became what was authentic, which “can only be expressed, not discussed or argued about.”