Criminal Litigation Is The Punish Perpetrators

The criminal justice system ensures the safety and protection of society from criminal offenders. The process of the criminal justice system begins when a criminal offense is reported to law enforcement officials. If required, an investigation begins, leading to a warrant and arrest. Following the arrest, bail is set and a preliminary hearing is scheduled. If the defendant is indicted, a trial date is set. Providing the defendant does not waive the right to a jury trial, a

Consider the design of a puppet. When observing this structure, one will give attention to the source of the puppet’s actions being dictated by the puppeteer. These actions are able to be transmitted from the will of the puppeteer into the puppet through the strings that the puppeteer uses to control specific parts of the puppet. Furthermore, one can infer that the strings of the puppet are the motive behind the puppet’s action. If the puppet’s actions are disoriented or even disjointed, one can infer that the strings or the motives behind the puppet’s actions are conflicting. A notable literary example of this depiction can be found in Victor Hugo’s Les Miserablés. Late in Book V: Valjean, Jean Valjean describes the method of reasoning behind Javert’s suicide when he says, “To owe life to a criminal...to betray society in order to remain true...these absurdities should come about and be heaped on top of him...it was this that defeated him” (Hugo 1181). Javert’s adherence to his internal conflict imploded and eventually influenced his suicide; a reader might see Javert’s decision and confirm that an inner conflict of motives prompted his unanticipated action. Fyodor Dostoyevsky, a 19th Century existentialist Russian author, portrays a similar theme in his book Crime and Punishment which tells the story of a man named Raskolnikov, the suspect of a murder case, who appears like a puppet with actions that become increasingly

For starters let’s begin with a criminal court which is a court that has jurisdiction to try and punish offenders against the law. The Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure are criminal proceedings in U.S. district courts, the courts of appeals, and the Supreme Court. Their purpose is to provide a simple and fair court proceeding. The original rules were observed by the Supreme Court in 1944, and then later on in 1954 congress took over the rules of criminal procedures and it has been edited multiple times most recently in 2014. However, a civil court is another type of civil process and it is very different from criminal court.

“One word can aptly describe the punishment imposed on perpetrators in the first half of that century — cruel” (Curland). Crime and punishment in the 1800s was very severe and often was amusing to the public. Some techniques of punishment included branding, whipping, and ear nailing. The English-American colonies used a patriarchal method to their punishment. The men, typically civil officers, or religious leaders, made the laws. The less fortunate, including children, servants, slaves, soldiers, farmers, and tradesmen had to obey the harsh rules put in place. On Sundays, Virginian ministers had to read the Articles, Lawes and Orders. Failure to go to church two times each day would result in the loss of a day’s worth of food. The second

In court, I observed an arraignment. An arraignment is an appearance in court to hear the charges and to make a plea. Before they appeared at their arraignment they were supposed to go through the steps of the criminal justice system. First, there was an investigation, an arrest, and booking. If the suspect was a juvenile, they would go into the juvenile justice system. Next is the prosecution; charging, initial appearance, preliminary hearing, and indictment or information. During charging, the prosecution attorneys are the link between police and the court; they must decide if there is reasonable cause to believe an offense was committed, they either are released or have an initial appearance. At the initial appearance, they are brought before a judge, given a formal notice of charges, advised of their rights, and given a chance to post bail. If not enough evidence has been produced, the judge will dismiss the case and if there is enough evidence, they will move on to a preliminary hearing. The preliminary hearing allows a judge to decide whether there is probable cause

Entry into the system is the first thing is the report from the victim, then there is an investigation and finally if there is enough evidence then they can make an arrest (“The Criminal Justice System”). Prosecution and Pretrial has to do with the prosecutor seeing if there are going to be any charges made, the first court appearance, if charged they can be release on bail or on bond, grand jury hearing, and arraignment. Adjudication is when most cases are resolved by plea agreements and not a lot of people go on a trial. If they do have a trial and are convicted of the charges, then the judge will set a date for their sentencing (“The Criminal Justice System”). If found innocent, then they are released. Post-trial is when the defendant gets to see what their sentence is. Depending on the crime the judge gets to choose their sentence. They either get fines, probation, jail or prison, or the death penalty.

1. Outline and explain the three key goals victims can pursue through the criminal justice system.

To what extent has the media shaped your understanding of crime and the criminal justice system?

To begin with, Deterrence is the belief that society can reduce crime by making punishment tougher than the benefits gained from criminal acts. To “deter means to prevent” a person of an act by the threat, warning, or as in imprisonment (Merriam-Webster, 2015). The death penalty serves as a powerful deterrent to people who may choose to commit major crimes. The issue with the Death penalty is the lack of ability of the justice system in carrying out the penalty immediately. The long appeal process compromises the deterrence reason of capital punishment. Some criminals are truly above the law, in that their influence can reach the outside world even if they are behind bars. For an example, recently in New York “two criminals used their outside

The idea of having a criminal law, procedure and a proper court system has been a concern and must in the United States since it was first founded. This concept is always under consistent speculation and undergoes changes almost every year. One of the most influential pieces included into the procedure of criminal law and the court system is the Bill of Rights. The Bill of Rights was created by the representatives of America to not only enforce the idea of substantive law, but also create a framework for the rights of every day Americans. Ever since the creation of the Bill of Rights, there has been a constant need for change laws and procedures in order to accommodate for rights given to each citizen. In this paper, the analysis of the

People of the United States may demand that criminals must be taken over by revenge equivalent to their crimes. If you commit a crime, retribution may be taken place. Retribution is a punishment or consequence given to a criminal by using revenge. The government will use punishments to correct the criminal because of their offenses. However, victims are known to inflict vengeance on the criminal, but this is not tolerated by the law. Instead, designated officials have the responsibility of handling the punishment. The victim will not be repaid; the state will have this responsibility from the criminal. According to Edward L. Rubin at Vanderbilt University’s School of Law, “Retribution has become increasingly popular, among both legislators

Before the trial even starts, there are several things that have already happened. The first is the arrest of the charged person. The person is arrested by police, or he/she turns himself/herself in, based on one or more charges that have been brought against the person. The person must then make an initial appearance before a judge. The person must be arraigned in a timely fashion and the defendant must then enter a plea at that hearing. If the defendant pleads guilty, there is no need for a criminal trial as the person is admitting that they are guilty (Nolo, 2012).

How should we as a community respond to wrongdoing? When a crime occurs or when harm is inflicted, what needs to happen? What does justice look like? In our Western criminal justice system, emphasis is placed on what law has been broken and what punishment is the appropriate sentence for breaking that law. The primary questions that are asked are:

Crime may simply be referred to as an offense against the state or against morality and is punishable by law, while justice is the fairness practiced during judgment of cases usually in instances where crime has taken place. Crime and justice go hand in hand as commonly evident in a case whereby a criminal is apprehended and taken to a court of law, then a ruling of justice practiced on the case and fairness used in passing of judgments. In most governments globally, crime and justice is managed by a criminal and justice department and typically, various departments are involved. These departments may primarily include; the police, the prosecution department, the law department, the correctional

Criminal Justice in general terms refers to the agencies of government charged with enforcing law, adjudicating crime, and correcting criminal conduct in the society. The criminal justice system is essentially an instrument of social control used by the government. Society considers some behaviors so dangerous and destructive that it either tries to strictly control their occurrence or outlaws them outright. It is therefore, the job of the agencies of justice to prevent these behaviors by apprehending and punishing transgressors or deterring their future occurrence.