Critical Analysis Of Much Ado About Nothing

1290 Words6 Pages
William Shakespeare was a fantastic play writer whose stories consisted of mainly romance and tragedies. His name comes up whenever there is a discussion regarding plays and performances. Much Ado about Nothing is a fascinating story which consists of characters with many weaknesses and strengths as should every fictional persona. Although, I don’t believe William Shakespeare meant to design these characters as realistic, but rather, to represent ideas, social or political issues, and even just human failure. Much Ado about nothing means “to make a fuss” about nothing. So, the obvious lesson here is not to jump to conclusions and not to overreact to simple inconveniences. However, personally, I think that every one of William Shakespeare’s plays teaches a more subtle lesson. You cannot simply fall in love at the drop of a hat, and making assumptions can cause more trouble than it is worth. These lessons are promoted in the entirety of this play. Hero and Claudio are naive and struck with love at first sight, and while there is an obvious problem with this idea, that’s not the subject of my concerns. The subject lies within two characters who seem to have a decent relationship. These two characters are widely regarded as a healthy couple, but if you dig deep, this is not the case. Beatrice and Benedick, two very intelligent characters also possess evident flaws that are very difficult not to notice. Beatrice is a clever woman with a temper, she and Benedick argue

More about Critical Analysis Of Much Ado About Nothing

Open Document