Critical Analysis Of Remini

Beginning with a contextualization of America surrounding the 2004 presidential election. This was the first election since the 9-11 attacks and the beginning of the war on terror. Many Americans uneasy, and the state of the nation was unstable. With this fear and instability,

Barack Obama's powerful diction creates hope for the future of the United States with word choices such as “continue,” “shifted” and “ambitions.” Barack’s shift from informal to formal diction constructs an image of unity through the usage of simple, personal pronouns, such as “we” and “us.” The shifts from informal to formal and back appeal to the emotions of the audience because they feel as if Obama is talking directly to them. His allusions to the Bible are sentimental because when he says "the God given promise that all are equal, all are free, and all deserve a chance to pursue their full measure of happiness" he creates a bond between himself and his audience. His words have a motivating connotation that appeal to both logos and pathos. The way in which Barack Obama presents his ideas allows his audience to have confidence in him and his role as president.

Through the use of rhetorical questions and assertions, Kevin Dowd writes an article called, “King Kevin Versus Queen Cersei” to inform his readers that the Democratic candidates are not prepared for the Presidency and the Republican candidates are informed/educated and are a better choice for the role as President of America.

The 2008 campaign was rife with racist imagery and attacks, but in fairness this divisiveness was present in both the Democratic and Republican parties. The “Birther Movement,” which claims that President Obama was not born in Hawaii but instead in Kenya, or another muslim state, and frequently claims that the former President is secretly a muslim. This case in many ways is the culmination of the issue facing “The Party Decides,” because John McCain, now the Republican nominee after falling short eight years before, struck down notions that then Senator Obama was foreign born, Muslim, or an Arab.This was not an easy

Presidential candidates whom fight the battle and come out on the top have a specific job they must do. They must give their inauguration to the people of that country to help them understand what will come about these years of this election. Going back centuries ago, Andrew Jackson didn’t have much of destruction going on in the United States, as for Henry Truman, he had to deal with the after effects of WWII. With these two candidates for a presidential spot, they both give what they will do in a time of rebuilding; speaking with a substantial purpose, the use of figurative language and stylistic choices bring about the goals that they are seeking to accomplish. Jackson and Truman both were in a stage of rebuilding, but they both didn’t have the same chaos that they had to clean up.

I am an early riser. It isn’t surprising, then, that on Election Night, despite Wolf Blitzer’s attention-disordered, apoplectic news coverage of Trump’s impending election, I was calm, even haughty as I tromped off to bed before 10 p.m.

Remini’s con was the McCain-Palin campaign. He was disgusted with the thought of McCain ever being on the presidential election, which either made Remini to be a democrat or another type of organization. The author used a mixture of blunt and subtle words when he was describing the McCain-Palin campaign. When Remini talks about the recruiting of running mates, he passively says that governor Sarah Palin was only a publicity stunt to “solidify his appeal” (xvi). Remini mentions that Palin was “attractive and hard hitting”, but she was all talk. (xvi). He describes her as being nothing more than a pretty face to try to cover up his flaws, which she did not do very well. The time after the nominations seemed hectic for the McCain-Palin campaign. The author analyzes McCain’s reactions as petty, and he seemed unqualified to be a president due to the fact that he could not handle the pressure. Remini even goes to the extent of somewhat predicting that McCain had no chance in ever making the polls when he compared him to George W. Bush’s presidency

1. One of the main arguments of the debate was situated against inventive and the ways it presented itself in Hillary Clinton’s campaign. For example the proposition said that Clinton’s background was a good indicator of her future decisions and that inventive is based off of situated. The opposition rebuttal included the argument that situated is only a platform and the way she speaks now and the narrative that is created is more important is current predicament of the race. The also debated on party allegiance and the factors that play into that. The proposition argued that depending on your political party, you bring different situated ethos while the opposition debated that especially in this election, using examples of the split Republican

Despite being published before the 2016 Presidential Election, Levendusky’s book is still relevant today. In chapter two, he finds that, “while partisan media shows defend their ticket of choice, they spend just as much—if not more—time attacking the other one.” Levendusky recalled news clips from the 2008 Presidential Election between Democratic President Barack Obama and Republican Senator John McCain. According to the book, right-wing news outlets called Obama “a tax-and-spend liberal,” while their left-wing counterparts said McCain’s vice president pick Governor Sarah Palin had a lack of

In The Gamble, Sides and Varveck argue that there are three fundamental factors, which play into Presidential elections. These fundamentals are the economy, approval rating, and length of time that the party has held office. According to Sides and Varveck, the bed was made for President Obama’s 2012 reelection. While all three fundamentals played a significant role in 2012, it can be argued that the economy set the groundwork for the other two to follow. (Sides & Varveck, 5)

The 2004 and 2012 Presidential Elections demonstrated the voter’s commitment to incumbent Presidents during tough times and major crises. In 2004, voters were interested in foreign policy, terrorism and the current wars. In 2012 the national focus was the economy, following the financial crisis that began in 2008. Consequently, the challenging nominees had backgrounds appropriate for the issues, but had the inability to stand out as a better option. Perhaps because, typically incumbents have the advantage of better name recognition, experience and their agenda has had longer time to be defined.

Incumbent Barack Obama battled it out against Republican Mitt Romney. Their campaign styles, reputation, and platforms were the ultimatum of the outcome of the general election. The economic conditions both in 2012 and leading up to that year were at devastatingly low points, where unemployment rate was a boggling 10%, highest it had been since the 1982 recession. Although, Romney came from a political family it unfortunately wasn’t enough to sway the voters’ opinions causing him to lose the presidential election. Our nation was dealing with a plethora of significant issues during this time and the citizens wanted a president who could promise to resolve those conflicts. Obama, being a returning president allowed voters to put their trust in

(Marcus, Paragraph 12) She tells that he did not have words to describe Obama’s statement and choices; therefore, he could not give an honest opinion on any of the fiscal matters. (Marcus, Paragraph 13) This gives a great example to the main point of the article. Where is Obama in today’s issues. What is he doing to help our nation? He fails to do as he said he would while he was running. Marcus does an outstanding job in writing this by explaining her position in the matter and giving her honest opinion. Although she could have used many more examples she did well with the work she had. She was very convincing with her argument and did well presenting her outlook on Obama. Marcus left it open for the reader to form their own judgement of Obama’s

The theme of the book is how a little known, under-experienced, and under-rated candidate became President of the United States, and through the use of the best minds available without regard to political affiliation, guided the country through its darkest hour to become a "nation indivisible."

First of all, this paper will be analysing its context and purpose of Bill Clinton’s speech. On September 5th, 2012, Bill Clinton delivered his amazing speech at the Democratic National Convention in Charlotte, North Carolina. Although his speech mostly consist of logos appeals to persuade his audience in a ceremonial setting, he begins his speech in an epideictic tone focusing on developing the ethos of Barack Obama. At the Democratic National Convention, the Democratic Party and the rest of the Americans witness Bill Clinton proclaiming his support for Obama to be re-elected while stating the reasons why he should be reappointed. The purpose of his speech was not only to express the president’s future objectives but also to show