Critical Analysis On Obamacare

Recently, in June 2017, Grant Charley reported a news article named ‘One Almost-Certain Risk for Investors in the Health-Care Bill; Higher out of pocket spending will keep the spotlight on healthcare costs’ in The Wall Street Journal which was published by Dow Jones & Company. Later, in August 2017, Deborah Barfield Berry reported a news article named ‘Blacks look to close health gap; With ACA in limbo, leaders take matters into their own hands’ in USA Today which was published by the newspaper company itself. Both the newspaper articles were focused on the proposed healthcare bill and Affordable Care Act (ACA).

While the Obamacare act has both pros and cons, people are likely to support it or disagree to it on account of the perspective that they see things from. In spite of the fact that the act involves a series of benefits, it is difficult and almost impossible for one to ignore the fact that it is likely to cause a significant shortage of healthcare professionals and that it is also probable to cause an increase in drug prices.

For years there has been a shortage of nurses. President Obamas new affordable care act is now in full effect and is increasing this shortage. The care act not only effects nurses, but also all heath care professionals, and the unemployment rate. The shortage will continue to escalade due to the patient demand the care acts brings, along with employers not being able to provide their employees health care. This means larger patient loads, higher unemployment, and diminished quality of care for patients. The diminished quality of care brings up the question of rather ObamaCare is worth the effort, or if it is just a contradiction.

The author being employed at the American Enterprise Institute, “A conservative think tank,” definitely makes this argument more persuasive than if it was a liberal writer that had written this article. Being a conservative, he should be more aware of the similarities towards conservatism that Obamacare has, rather than a liberal. It gives him more credibility in his claim that Obamacare’s health care policy is “A conservative one at heart.”

We now know that many of the claims President Obama made about his health care reform law have been proven false. People who liked their health care plans and their doctors have not always been able to keep them under Obamacare. The Obamacare website was badly designed, not secure, untested, and prone to frequent, random crashes. Insurance premiums have gone up for many; they certainly have not fallen by an average of $2,500 per family, as was claimed would happen under Obamacare.

In the wake of the 2016 presidential election, concerns have been raised regarding the Republicans’ desire to repeal the Affordable Care Act, informally referred to as Obamacare. The ACA was originally enacted into law in 2010 and has been annually provisioned to expand its ability to not only improve the nation’s access to health care, but also to reform the health care delivery system. Through the ACA, private and public insurance has become more available and affordable, new health care delivery models have improved quality of care, and several workforce policies have made primary care a more desirable profession for medical students.

In my opinion the news should be talking about this more as many Americans are being negatively effected by Obama care. Health care is in my opinion should be at the forefront of politics especially because right now the system we have in place is failing us. It is obvious that the author of this article, Michelle Malkin, is writing this in an attempt to expose liberals on the dumpster fire that is Obama care. Considering this, the most important part of the story is when Malkin gave some statistics on the rate increases for individual health care plans. I think this is the most important part because it gave concrete evidence as to how Obama care has been damaging health care for Americans. Malkin is definitely a Republican who is fed up with Obama care and how the Liberals have been trying to cover it up. This article was especially interesting to me because my dad is a doctor and from the very beginning he said that Obama care would be a disaster and now it seems that he is

With the ANA support in March of 2010 President Obama proposed the Health Care Reform Act to help assure individuals better, high-quality, and affordable health care insurance coverage. ("Health care reform in the United States", 2010, p.1). "The health care is a human right, and will continue to fight on behalf of nurses and their patients to ensure that this is achieved" (Ana: Ensuring nurses, paragraph, 1). By attending and speaking at public health care events, being involved with other stakeholders like; Health Reform Dialogue (HRD) group, and along with staying up to date and in contact with the Congress and Capitol Hill the ANA shows it's involvement to achieving the goal that the health care reform act insures. Stakeholders and other health care professional organizations gather to speak about " health coverage, disease prevention, and increasing funds for education. These ideas are now being projected to the media and Congress (Ana: Ensuring nurses).

After one of the most grueling presidential races in American history, the populous candidate Donald Trump has been elected by the American people as our next president. While campaigning, one of the first things that Trump vowed to accomplish in office was to repeal and replace the Affordable Care Act (donaldjtrump.com). Trump should have no trouble doing this with the support of both the Republican senate and the Republican House. The consequences of what exactly will be done is a constantly argued topic and the phrase “repeal and replace Obamacare” has become a sort of buzzword in the media.

The three most important points in my article were: Obamacare was meant to be affordable healthcare for everyone, subsidies were given to people near the poverty line, and the provisions of the original Obamacare. The affordability isn't necessarily cheap for everyone. Only the people who had been denied insurance or didn't receive insurance from their employers got the sure benefit. The subsidies given to the people near the poverty line was unfair to those that were just above poverty but we're still struggling with their health insurance coverage. The provisions of the original Affordable Care Act let people have an extension to their health plan deadlines.

Obamacare may be one of the most debatable topics at the moment ever since 2010. For those who are still confused on what Obamacare is and how it works is understandable and common amongst Americans. Obamacare is also known as the Affordable Care Act. It can be summed up as a law that ensures every American has access to health insurance that is affordable and within their budget. This is done by offering people discounts on government-sponsored health insurance plans, and by expanding the Medicaid assistance program so they include more people who can’t afford health care. In order for someone to qualify for Obamacare they must have an insurance plan that covers at least ten essential services that pertain

Source 1): This source is on the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010, the source details the general effects of the act and how it was received by the public. The article describes the initial implementation of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care act by providing the reader with the number of people that this act will cover who previously had no health insurance, the article then goes on to speak about the regulations that the act will place on current insurers to prevent patients from being dropped. The article then moves on to speak about how the public reacted to the act once it was passed and tells us that initially the act was debated with the democratic party mainly in support and the republican party somewhat

I decided to review different media genres on Obamacare. I know many people disagree with the act because it brings rates up, but many need it to get the help they need. For this essay, I reviewed a YouTube video posted by a famous author, a random blog post I came across and a scholarly article off of the Uvu library website.

As an illustration, the writers explain how insurance is based on risk pools, and in their own words say, “The lucky subsidize the unlucky.” They further explain that the unlucky who have vexatious health problems benefit much more than those who remain healthy. The board shares: “Obamacare’s rules hamstring insurers. They can’t exclude people for pre-existing conditions, and can’t charge older customers more than three times as much as the young.” As a consumer this may sound great, but to the insurer, this is deadly. To offset the influx of older customers requiring expensive care, the insurers raise the rates for young customers, making them pay higher premiums that do not justify their claims. The board continues by saying, “Obamacare allowed Americans to sign up after they got sick and needed help paying all those medical bills.” To the company this is no way to make money, so many insurers are backing out, skewing the market. When the arguments are put together, they build upon one another further proving the case why Obamacare has

There are over three million nursing professional in United States and they make the largest segment of nation’s health care workforce. Nurses can play a vital role in helping to realize the objectives set forth in the 2010 affordable act, legislation that represents the broadest health care overhaul since the 1965 creation of Medicare and Medicaid program (IOM 2010). Due to the restricting barriers nurses were not able to respond effectively to the changing health care systems. In 2008, The