Critical Review : A Critical Analysis Of Wayne Rooney's 'The Guardian'

To be clear: Your readers should not know what your position is about the subject. Your readers should only know whether or not you felt the article was reasonable, well-developed, fair, etc. Do not include personal opinion or personal judgments about the subject matter. Do not include personal narrative.

This article’s biggest problem is that it doesn’t know what its own purpose is. This article isn’t trying to

Can a simple article have enough inspiration for change? Sometimes words mean more than actions. Although this is most likely not the case, Allen West’s article “Black youth overlooked by the economic boom” published by Fox News, has an impressive argument. West states unemployment rates for black youth has risen over the past year. Furthermore, the unemployment rates are highest in the inner cities. Additionally, West gives information on what is causing the unemployment. The higher minimum wage is, the higher unemployment is. West’s claim is to fight for a wage ceiling for a good standard of living, not a high minimum wage. West’s goal for a higher wage ceiling, he says, will fix poverty and unemployment rates in inner cities. West’s use of logically appealing facts and statistics, as well as, his credibility and

Jen Lemos is very objective when writing in the article. Lemos sticks with the information he got and doesn’t tell much about his own opinion. There is none form of appeal in the newspaper. He writes about what Liza Kessler and Judith Mellen talks about and their opinion.

Connection to the audience is what page needs in order to improve her argument and allow the audience to trust and relate to page. Next, The reliance on others work is too much and for an effective argument they must be either cut out or be provided more elaboration towards them. Another reason for this ineffective article is the absence of Page's opinion and how she could believes or does not believe that there is a hope or a fix to the problem she has presented. If Page could improve on these areas she may be able to write a more effective

As the title suggests, the article takes in the form of a first person view or personal opinion on the topic. Bob Murphy is a Western Bulldogs star football player, which holds credibility to what he says in relation to the issues Goodes faces on the football field. The source’s main difference to the ABC NEWS broadcast source is that this takes in the form of an article which is a totally different medium as it presented different textual elements. An example is of the text written are more formal and are seemingly directed to the audience

The Rooney rule is a rule that the NFL created back in 2002 and implemented in 2003. According to Burke (2013) “the rule stated that each organization had to interview at least one minority candidate for all coaching and general manager positions once there was an opening.” The Rooney rule changed the league as a whole, according to Thomas George of the New York Times in an online article (2002), “since 1920 the league has hired more than 400 head coaches and only 6 or 1.5% have been African American.” This rule was specifically created to help African American and other minority coaches get head coaching jobs at the professional level. This was a great rule that the NFL decided to create, according to George (2002), “minorities compose nearly 70 percent of the league,” but the coordinators jobs are 72 percent white and 28 percent African American. After the Rooney Rule was put in place it took a while but the

It did not provide much information that was not previously covered, and did not cover many details. The negative point of view and highly opinionated author made it difficult to pull out facts and separate opinion and bias. Some opinions were extreme, and almost distorted the truth. However, it did bring in an outlook that the other selections did not offer. Clearly, many people would be opposed to wrongful academic practices, but the other authors here did not venture so far as to explicitly state their beliefs. There are also interesting points and examples listed that were not found elsewhere. Although this did not help much overall, I stayed engaged while reading the article; I wanted to know where Weber’s argument would go next.

This article was very straight forward and he wastes no time stating how he feels and his point of view. With this being said he doesn’t acknowledge the other side. It’s his opinion and point of view basically makes the entirety of the essay. It’s a great essay overall. I will be using this article for my essay because it flows very well with my topic. I’ve used it before and in a previous essay and it strengthened my argument so I’m confident it will help my ethos.

The texts’ Daily mail and the CEOP Where’s Klaus video have similarities and differences in which they present their topics to the targeted audiences. The Daily Mail text is to advise as well as warn parents of teenagers about the consequences of going on social networking sites like Facebook and is aimed at well-educated, professional parents of children between 11-18, undergoing their educational courses. The Where’s Klaus video is also used as a cautioning to well-educated mothers, who don’t have as much time to spend with their kids, telling them the consequences of not protecting their children on the internet.

However this article could have been perceived better if it had an intended audience other than the general public. She had enough evidence to support her claim and enough to say that it could have easily been made into a formal essay with a better, more educated audience offhand that might have taken her more seriously. While it is necessary to get information out there to everyone, perhaps the more educated population could have done more with this type of article.

The article is very well writing and seems to be very well researched in many areas throughout the entire article. What I am not impressed with is the way that the author executed some of the beginnings and endings of topics. There were some instances where it did not make any sense to me.

The way the author wrote this editorial was okay. I felt as if they didn’t explain what their opinion was. However, the author did provide information to help understand what was going on. In my opinion, even though it’s

(Marcus, Paragraph 12) She tells that he did not have words to describe Obama’s statement and choices; therefore, he could not give an honest opinion on any of the fiscal matters. (Marcus, Paragraph 13) This gives a great example to the main point of the article. Where is Obama in today’s issues. What is he doing to help our nation? He fails to do as he said he would while he was running. Marcus does an outstanding job in writing this by explaining her position in the matter and giving her honest opinion. Although she could have used many more examples she did well with the work she had. She was very convincing with her argument and did well presenting her outlook on Obama. Marcus left it open for the reader to form their own judgement of Obama’s

The article was well written and organized thought. However it did had a bit of deficiencies. Although the usage of personal experience and opinions are existing but she also used a lot of rhetorical strategies. This overreliance made the argument and the tone sound little bit emotional. The introduction of