Critical Review of Globe Framework for Assessing National Cultures

Lewis, a variety of leadership structures are outlined according to each country. This helps to highlight the vast differences in leadership and management style around the globe, and can aid companies as they begin to forge into the global market.[1] The differences are striking, even between countries with similar cultural backgrounds, like the United Kingdom and the United States of America and demonstrate that in order to have a truly successful business partnership with a different country, you must spend time learning to understand exactly how that country handles business, and how it manages it’s employees. Lewis states, “By focusing on the cultural roots of national behavior, both in society and business, we can foresee and calculate with a surprising degree of accuracy how others will react to our plans for them, and we can make certain assumptions as to how they will approach

This literature review will make use of four pieces of academic work to discuss how the concept of culture can intrinsically affect leadership. The literature finds that the link between culture and leadership is an important, yet complicated relationship. I will begin by discussing and defining the central concepts of culture and leadership. I will then explain and analyse the significance of culture upon leadership. Finally I will review Hofstede’s cultural framework to assess its significance and relevance to the topic at hand.

Story, Barbuto, Luthans and Bovaird (2014) differentiate global from regular leadership through explaining that global leadership involves dealing with more challenges and influencing people from varied

Managers in today’s world are important assets to the multicultural organisations. Leadership styles of managers are highly important in terms of managing the team of followers, which has a correlation to the productivity and results that the team would achieve in the future. By having good management, it contributes to the success of the organisation. Hence, it is vital to identify the different leadership styles especially in different cultures to suit the working environment and culture of the organization. In the present multicultural global business industry, cultural differences can come in the way of the success of project completion (Anbari, Khilkhanova, Romanova, & Umpleby , 2009) . It has been claimed that rigid leadership does not promote motivation and creativity, therefore, managers should lead by flexible leadership and be culturally sensitive, adapting to different cultures, for the team to be able to move forward and reach their goals (Anabri et al. 2009). The way a manager’s leadership takes place also affect’s the experience of the employees at work and the relationship between the manager and the employee. Jariya (2012, p66) states that ‘different cultures differ in the values they endorse, people from these cultures often interpret the same managerial practices

Introduction No matter what part of the world a person lives in, he or she exists in a culture. Culture is an intricate and beautiful part of society, as every culture differs greatly. Although each culture is different, the core of all cultures are the same. Culture is defined as, “The sum of the material and nonmaterial components underlying the social environment” (cite textbook). Culture can be broken down into parts; these parts include material and nonmaterial aspects of culture, cultural norms, and social issues.

The authors of the white paper conducted a series of interviews designed to solicit the knowledge and opinions of 18 CEO’s and C-suite executives of Fortune 500 companies to put together a list of characteristics and prerequisites that are vital to the successful trajectory of an effective business leader. Among a series of such requirements, global exposure through global assignments was a repeating mantra. Hand in hand with this was cultural sensitivity. One of the quotes cited in the white paper declared, “You have to have a very open, inclusive, global perspective – the ability to connect the dots, to really assimilate different

In the article” Making it Overseas” by Mansour Javidan, Mary Teagarden, and David Bowen, states that for developing skills of global leadership, working all in various countries is one of the strategies which people can gain capabilities for cross-cultural issues. However, by gaining working experience overseas is not the only determinant to decide leaders’ success. In order to succeed overseas, leaders need a global mind-set, which includes Intellectual Capital, Psychological Capital, and Social Capital, and each of them are defined by three specific characteristics.

Cultures across the world differ in just about everything. Why would leadership be any different? While listening to Sayaka Isoda, from Japan, and Ali Al-Tameemi, from Iraq, I saw just how different their countries were from the United States. These differences led to differences in leadership between the three countries.

Global expansion, Global Leadership, Global Trends, are all important topics in this growing business world, it is crucial to be a leader who is effective in the comprehension of cultural variances between their native country and the countries they are interesting in working with. Businesses know that it is important to have a leader who has the ability to work in diverse work environments (Murmu, 2014, p67). Furthermore, adding to the need of leaders who can identify, understand and correctly address different issues that can arise when doing business globally, such as, culture, religious conviction, and society within each country they wish to conduct business in. The avoidance of making the error of operating under the assumption that all

In order to form a leadership that keep on with the passage of time, international leaders and managers ought to demonstrate likely competences in cross-cultural cognizance and practice. It is vital they recognize the value of leadership and managerial potentials, and to grow and sustain effective leadership approaches and methods for abiding diversity management (Ulrich and Smallwood, 2012). The conjecture emerges is that successful and effective international leaders and managers holds key to solve the secret of working with diverse workforce and dealing with them for the purpose of organizational development in order to enhance competitiveness.

Culture influences leadership in many ways, so it is helpful to first understand what culture is. According to our text culture is defined as the learned beliefs, values, rules, norms, symbols, and traditions that are common to a group of people (Northouse, 2016). Culture is the way of life, customs, and script of a group of people. Different cultures have different ideas about what they want from their leaders, but by understanding cultural differences leaders can become more empathetic and accurate in their communication with others. It is clear that different culture groups desire different leadership behaviors when they are looking for an effective leader. Surprisingly there were effective leadership attributes that was identified as universal characteristics. Positive leader attributes include being trustworthy, positive,

The most communicated organizational need in the global business environment is organizational leadership. Today, more than nine hundred universities and colleges exist to train, teach, and educate those who wish to become leaders in the specific topics of organizational leadership. Moreover, publications that inform benchmarks, best practices, and basic leadership concepts are becoming must read material in the global organization. Even though leadership may be defined in many different ways, the substance of the definition is similar. Leadership has been said to be a trait, an ability, skill, behavior, and relationship (Leadership & New Leadership Styles, 2016). No matter what leadership is to the individual, leadership is needed and

Global leadership is contingent upon an organization’s ability to compete in the global marketplace using goods, services, technology and human capital. It is the ability to create tangible strategies and to turn them into reality (Holloway, 2009). Therefore, as global

In times of rapid globalisation and economic development growth, the environment of business has become more and more complicated as a huge number of firms want to globally expand their businesses. Subsequently, the managerial implications of cross-cultural management is the challenge of this development. As Abbe (2007) states, cross-cultural leadership has developed as a way to understand leaders who work in the global markets. Culture is the “software of mind” that can influence people’s patterns of thinking and behaving.

Kroeber and Kluckhohn (1962) identify over 150 scientific definitions of the concept of culture. Indeed, many authors have tried to define culture and this is why there are so many definitions and that a unique one is hard to find. First of all, Kroeber and Kluckholn (1952) assume that culture is a suite of patterns, implicit and explicit, “of and for behaviour acquired and transmitted by symbols, constituting the distinctive achievements of human groups, including their embodiments in artefacts” (p.47). Later, Hofstede adds that culture is “the collective programming of the mind which distinguishes the members of one category of people from another” (Hofstede, 1991, p.51). This definition is the most widely accepted one amongst practitioners. For Winthrop (1991), culture is the distinctive models of thoughts, actions and values that composed members of a society or a social group. In other words,