Critical Thinking Questions

The challenger disaster called for certain changes in the NASA organizational structure, culture and operations. The Rogers Commission carried out a full investigation into the causes of the disaster and recommended to NASA certain actions to mitigate future incidents. First of all, there was a creation of a Solid Rocket Motor Joint redesign team who would also analyse the sealing system (NATA Technical Reports Centre, 2010).

Rockwell, the shuttle’s primary contractor, did not support the launch due to the possibility of ice leaving the structure and damaging the thermal shield tiles during takeoff. Their concerns were relayed to NASA, but in such a way that NASA chose to proceed with the launch [2]. Though this was eventually determined to be a non-issue in the Challenger launch, the true nature of the problems that can occur when an object strikes the shuttle during takeoff would not be learned until 2003, when the space shuttle Columbia disintegrated on re-entry due to damage of a heat shield tile that occurred during takeoff [2]--[3].

Describe a situation in which critical and creative thought could have been used for a better outcome. Describe why it is important to think critically and creatively in similar situations.

Describe a situation in which critical and creative thought could have been used for a better outcome. Describe why it is important to think critically and creatively in similar situations.

1. They hired more broads than men. They hired more women than men. 2. He used to hire micks around here.

The Columbia mission, STS-107, was interesting because the public was more aware of the risk that was being taken upon re-entry. During the launch a piece of insulating foam broke away from the external tank surface, striking the left wing. In previous missions there had been evidence of this occurring which to engineers was seen as minor. In the case of the Columbia craft failure, it was more serious because the damaged section of the wing was damaged to the extent of which it allowed hot atmospheric gases to penetrate the structure of the wing, pulling it apart, rendering the craft unstable.

When they would question his particular statement then it would be not able to answer them in the way that he wanted too. When looking through there he was seeing different things for explaining particular things. There are things they’re not understanding what is happening, looking for more things. He was looking through people vehicles in different ways. He was getting questioned through other human population, he is not understanding the other ways of how the community works. When the police question him they were stating that there was a man in the park being questionable. There was a man with a gloomy look on his face, he was seeing the world of light through his head. The community is having different things to stay and having more than different things to feel and what to do with their mind to make sure that there not having prospection of what is this going on and how is he doing it with

During the year of 1986, on January the twenty sixth, a horrific shock was felt around the country. After Neil Armstrong’s landing on the moon, Americans felt a great sense of national pride and invincibility but many Americans learned on that fateful day that nobody is invincible; one of the worst catastrophes of the United States space program occurred on that day. About forty five seconds after liftoff, Americans witnessed the destruction of the breathtaking challenger space shuttle. Even though the disaster caused nationwide sadness, the reasons for its failure are clear. Named after the British ship that sailed across the Atlantic hundreds of years, could carry more than two thousand pounds the challenger was truly a glorious achievement.

The pressure being put on me to send the Challenger was enormous, the President would be giving his State of the Union address and plans are he will be discussing the advancements the United States a made in the NASA program. I feel as though I have no choice, I must rely on all the testing that has been done. There is always risk when sending up any space shuttle, but the astronauts have been trained to do space

On 1st of February, 2003, the space shuttle Columbia exploded when it re-entered the Earth’s atmosphere after finished a 16 days mission in space. All seven astronauts were dead because of this incident. The National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) had stopped the space shuttle program for more than two years to investigate this tragedy. In the 16 days period, the astronauts did approximately 80 experiments on different categories, for example, life science and material science [1]. An investigation later has found out that the disaster was caused by a problem on the day that took off on 16th of January.

The Columbia Accident occured in 2003,A piece of foam struck Columbia Space shuttle left wing at launch ( pg.11).

It’s very clear that NASA ignored the group thinking avoidance techniques. The launch was the number one priority for the organization, and that is where all of its efforts were channeled. They made the decision to execute the launch early in their planning process, which minimized all of the variables and factors that present themselves within the hours leading to the actual execution. The advances in technology have been able to mitigate many issues, but you can’t ignore the effect of weather on the components of the shuttle. The experts brought up the concerns, but they were deliberately marginalized by the leadership. When I think of a seal, I immediately think of a $0.25 piece of rubber.

Fortunately, that hole didn't go unnoticed, as Wayne Hale and a few others noticed the damage of the Columbia (Koerth-Baker "Retired NASA Flight Director Blogs about the Aftermath of Columbia Disaster".). Though similar incidents have happened before, each previous time the shuttle was still able to come back just fine (Dowling "What Caused the Space Shuttle Columbia Disaster?"). However, they noticed that this puncture seemed to be more serious, though. He and his colleagues did inform this to their superiors and tried to inform them about the risks (Koerth-Baker "Retired NASA Flight Director Blogs about the Aftermath of Columbia Disaster".). Sadly, the memo was more or less ignored. Their superiors justified to them by saying, "'You know, there is nothing we can do about the damage to the TPS (Thermal Protection System). If it has been damaged, it’s probably better not to know. I think the crew would rather not know. Don’t you think it would be better for them to have a happy, successful flight and die unexpectedly during entry than to stay on orbit, knowing that there was nothing to be done, until the air ran out?' (Dowling "What Caused the Space Shuttle Columbia Disaster?")" Their superiors believed that this problem couldn’t really be solved, so consequently, the hole went unnoticed. Meanwhile, at the spaceport, the assignment was mostly finished as most of the experiments were done and completed

The insulating tiles represented one of the biggest design challenges in the shuttle. The material would need to be lightweight and cost effective. It must be able to withstand impact from orbital debris as well as very high and low temperatures, and it must have minimal thermal conductivity and heat expansion. Most importantly, it must be reusable. In order to fulfill all these requirements, NASA created the Thermal Protection System (TPS). The TPS is mostly comprised of High-Temperature Reusable Surface Insulation (HRSI) and Low-Temperature Reusable Surface Insulation (LRSI). The materials involved in the TPS would cover the outside of the Space Shuttle and provide protection against the cold temperatures of outer Space (as low as -250 F), as well as the extremely high reentry temperatures of the atmosphere (as high as

The best answer one can give to this is by giving the example of the Space Shuttle Columbia that was destroyed and the lives of all seven of its crew were lost precisely due to all of these conditions as was later discovered by the Columbia Accident Investigation Board (CAIB), conducted in order to investigate the causes of the Columbia disaster. 1. Cultural, -