Critically Evaluate the Debates Surrounding the Continuity of Bretton Woods’s Institutions. Which of These Institutions Would You Recommend to Be Discontinued? Justify Your Choice.

Several developing countries are sunk in debt and poverty because of the arrangements of global establishments, for example, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the World Bank. Their projects have been vigorously reprimanded for a long time and have been constantly blamed for poverty. Moreover, developing countries have been in constant expanded reliance on the wealthier countries, despite the IMF and World Bank's claim that their main goal is to fight poverty (Shah, 2013). During recent decades, the poorest nations on the planet have needed to swing progressively to the World Bank and IMF for money related help, because their impoverishment has made it unthinkable for them to acquire somewhere else. The World Bank and IMF connect strict

Argentina is a well known case study of the failure or negative outcome of some IMF's standard policies. In fact, Argentina carefully applied policies dictated by IMF, but, until it stuck up with those policies, it couldn't step out from its crisis, and it ran into even deeper economic and social problems. This failure of the IMF has often been cited as the demonstration of unsuitability of the standard IMF approach (the usual so-called Washington Consensus) for solving economic crisis in developing countries (Serra & Stiglitz, 2008, p. 44). Also, this failure led to hostile feelings versus IMF among the population of Argentina (Kanenguiser, 2000) and fueled generalised suspects over IMF decision-making process being politicized and serving

Due to capital limitations, most governments, particularly in the developing nations borrow funds from their bilateral friends and organizations such as World Bank and International Monetary Fund (IMF) in earnest to enable them pursue development projects, and sometimes to correct balance-of-payment deficits. Nevertheless, such governments must adhere to some outlined conditions that are spelt out in the article of agreement in order for them to secure the loans; otherwise, the loans are withheld (White, 2012). Equally, a healthy population significantly contributes to economic development of

One of the purposes for the creation of the World Bank and the IMF was to ensure that financial markets throughout the world are stable, which would be beneficial to the global economy and possibly prevent a global economic depression. However, there are not always positive outcomes for local economies of the countries that are part of these International Financial Institutions (IFI). Haiti was one of these countries that was impacted by the guidelines set in place by these institutions.

The IMF and World Bank providing loans to impoverished and financially unstable countries is not only irresponsible, it's unethical. I intend to use the example of the loans provided to Mexico during the Mexican peso crisis, also called the Tequila crisis or December mistake crisis to illustrate this, and then provide what I believe would be a better solution

Clearly, something went wrong in Bolivia. Internationally regulated trade seems a necessity, but there is surely a better way to do it. For instance, how much leverage did Bolivia have in the IMF? It seems they were the weaker party, in need of the IMF as savior. The problem is that inevitably the benefactor-beneficiary relationship is not sustainable, and can often hurt the beneficiary when the benefactor assumes control. If developing nations that participate in the IMF (whether receiving loans or otherwise) had equal power when it comes to decision making, they would not be taken advantage of by multi-national corporations. All countries participating in a trade organization should have equally powerful voices. This is the only way to keep the natural course of global capitalism from destroying weaker

The new Bretton Woods system was backed by nearly all the Allies, save for the Soviet Union, and seemed to be heralding a new era of global cooperation in the economy. Reality, however, did not match with that expectation. The insistence on using a gold standard brought forth bullionism reminiscent of the

This can be shown by the US having 17% control of the executive board meaning they have the right to veto as board approval requires 85%. Whereas India has only 2.44% of voting rights compared to the Netherlands who are significantly weaker in terms of economic power who have 2.17% . It can be argued that the way the voting structure works iensures that the IMF would prioritise its creditors and voters, so the EU and USA have a combined total of 49% thus they hold great sway over the institution. This can explain how in terms of loans 79.5% have gone to European countries, with the largest loans going to Greece, Portugal and Ireland to bail out their banks. Another accusation is that the IMF in general tends to create more harm than good when attempting to help countries as shown in the fast track scheme. Where they gave far too much loans to Argentina and they were forced to default . A similar event occurred to create the 1997 East Asia crisis where the IMF encouraged countries affected to borrow their way out of trouble thus making the crisis worse. These events were not prioritised by western country whereas when the Euro crisis hit the west only then did the IMF pour in billions to save essential countries in Europe. The IMF can be considered strongly European for all 11 directors in the IMF’s history have been European. So the IMF can be considered to be working in favour of western interests as

The World Bank and the IMF are among the two most corrupted financial institutions to exist today. They're also two of the wealthiest institutions in the world. While they were created after WWII supposedly to help countries recover in during harsh conditions or during economic troubles, they have seemingly done the opposite. They manipulate poor countries by giving loans out to countries that are in such harsh conditions that they must accept the loans. Once they do accept the loans, it becomes a never ending maze of debt. Examples of this corrupt dealing exists still today in countries within Africa. The institutions charge huge amounts of interest and place special conditions on the loans that are accepted which creates a great amount debt. Quickly,

In an effort to bring an end to world poverty the World Bank and IMF (International Monetary Fund) were established in 1944. Consisting of members from 44 nations “The Bank and the IMF are twin intergovernmental pillars supporting the structure of the world's economic and financial order”(Driscoll, 1996). In other words they are international economic organizations that grant loans to third world countries for development programs.

The IMF is obviously extremely biased. They have loaned money out and want it back with interest. The only way I can see it not being bias is to give money and not expect to get all of it back. As said before, the IMF was not able to negotiate and pursue drastic action in Argentina. Though they did try. They want their money back and to gain from their investment. Not expecting all their money back would ensure they will do what is best for the country. Would they actually invest without thinking they were getting something in return? No, plain and simple.

Throughout, there is a keen sense that the IMF is completely guided by ideology which is focused on the free market and the markets’ ability to guide the economy properly at all times. It would seem that all those who work at the IMF are misguided and/or towing the party line in the form of the Washington Consensus. Moreover, of greater concern is perhaps that throughout this piece, it would seem that the World Bank could do no wrong. Stiglitz portrays himself and the World Bank as the white knight(s) who were championing the rights of those who could not fight for themselves against the US government, the US Treasury and even the Federal Reserve. He does so with little regard to any policies or actions that these organizations have done for positive reasons or with positive results. He displays unwavering support for governments to stimulate aggregate demand via social spending, so it is surprising that he is so punitive towards Western governments.

The three major international economic institutions are the International Monetary Fund (IMF), the World Bank and the World Trade Organization; this book mainly focuses on the IMF and the World Bank, due to the author’s first-hand experience with both institutions. The IMF, a public institution built as a guiding hand for economic stability around the world, has brought false

The Bretton Woods Conference in 1944 spawned two IFIs, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the World Bank, in order to rebuild a

The readily identification of debt crisis was Mexico’s inability to serve its outstanding debt of $80 billion debt. And the situation continue to worsen, and one year later, by October 1983, 27 countries owing $239 billion had reschedule debts or in the process of doing so.