Criticism Great Gatsby

When considering Nick’s reliability as a narrator, several contradictions also exist concerning the consistency and dependability of his thoughts about Gatsby. Although Nick states that “Gatsby represented everything for which I had an unaffected scorn” (2) he also describes how Gatsby is “worth the whole damn bunch put together” (154) and that “there was something gorgeous about him [Gatsby]” (2). The above quotes contrast both Nick’s unfavorable and positive opinions of Gatsby and further add to his volatility and unpredictability. The greatest inconsistency occurs when Nick conveys how “Gatsby turned out all right in the end (2)”, despite later saying that he “disapproved of him from beginning to end” (154). It seems that by frequently changing his opinions on Gatsby, Nick is unsure and hesitant on portraying Gatsby’s character.

Bridge: This is a truth that is found in F. Scott Fitzgerald’s The Great Gatsby, novel full of unlikable characters, two of which are unhappily married women having affairs. The Great Gatsby is about a guy named James Gatsby. He buys a house in front of a woman named Daisy. He throws parties hopping she will come over but never does. It's a person named Nick that helps him out with Diarys. Daisy and Gatsby have history together, way back even before Daisy meet Tom. Gatsby does everything in his power to win back Daisy.

Shallowness and hollowness of the upper class is shown in The Great Gatsby by Daisy’s love and addiction for wealth and money. Many people may look at Daisy and call her a ‘fool’ for her addiction to money. Eventually this not only corrupts her in the murder of Myrtle; however, her shallowness leads to the death of Jay Gatsby because of the carelessness of Daisy; which allowed Gatsby to take the blame of the death of Myrtle. Daisy represents the carelessness of most women in the Upper Class for her addiction to wealth and status. Daisy is characterized as ‘the smell of money’; therefore, it is obvious that Daisy loves Tom for his money rather than his personality. “ I hope she’ll be a fool- that’s the best thing a girl can be in this world, a beautiful little fool,” (Fitzgerald, p23). This quote exemplifies the shallowness and hollowness of the woman in the novel. Daisy describes her daughter to Nick and Jordan as a girl who will be like her because she is in love and is manipulated into love with the idea of money. “They’re such beautiful shirts’ she sobbed, her voice muffled in the thick folds. ‘It makes me sad because I’ve never seen such-such beautiful shirts before” (Fitzgerald, p 89). This quotes further more proves the shallowness and hollowness of Daisy because she is in love with the belongings of Jay Gatsby rather than his actual personality. Daisy obviously values the

Cultural Criticism is the beliefs and interpretation of cultures in the eyes of other people rather one is more dominant or the others are inferior to them. In F. Scott Fitzgerald’s “The Great Gatsby” time period was divided up into social classes which were determined on a person’s will. The narrator Nick Caraway is a middle class man trying to make it in life financially, so he decided to move from the East Egg to the West Egg New York to get away from paying 3,000 to 4,000 dollars for renting a house. Cultural criticism explains a meaningful understanding which is shown in the novel with: social status, racism, beliefs, and ethnicity.

The important thing in the reader response theory is the interpretive of the readers itself, rather than the author or even the text. The theory gives the competence to the reader to critic the text, however with the condition the readers have the evidence or research from other people toward the critic. The way of their interpretation may reveal their identity, because the reader gives the critic depends on their knowledge and experience (Philip Goldstein, 2005). Everyone has their own perspective toward anything, especially for the literary works. Each of people perspective is unique. That is why reader response was created. The theory is about the transaction between the writer and the reader. The writer composed a meaningful text, whereas the reader composed an interpreted meaning of the text. Reader response is not about destroying the writer’s idea, but it is more constructing the work itself (Louise M. Rosenblatt, 1988).

Tom and Daisy both have almost created an excuse to their carelessness mentioning that Daisy is a Catholic. Nick however, knows that this is not true. Daisy is actually a money addict in the novel. She values materialistic items such as Gatsby’s shirts and house over that of actual love and relations. In the article “For the Love of Money” discusses the addiction as, “Wealth addiction was described by the late sociologist and playwright Philip Slater in a 1980 book, but addiction researchers have paid the concept little attention. Like alcoholics driving drunk, wealth addiction imperils everyone. Wealth addicts are, more than anybody, specifically responsible for the ever widening rift that is tearing apart our once great country. Wealth addicts are responsible for the vast and toxic disparity between the rich and the poor and the annihilation of the middle class.”(Polk 2014). This illness, is seen often as a good thing, the idea that of gaining more wealth to better yourself in society. In reality however it creates a cycle of pain and suffering. An isolation from society and its customs, replaced by a desire of green and selfishness, which is what Daisy is suffering from. Daisy refused to defend Gatsby’s honor by not confessing to the murder of Myrtle which she intentionally committed. Daisy refused to show Gatsby her true affection by telling

“Writers consistently use novels as a lens through which they scrutinise society.” To what extent do you agree with this view?

At the same party, Jordan remarks that Gatsby claims to be an Oxford man, though she does not seem convinced to his claim (53). As a result of all the various rumors, Nick creates an image of Gatsby in his mind as “a florid and corpulent person in his middle years (53).” Contrastingly, Gatsby appears to be around the same age as Nick, which leads to Nick’s failure to recognize Gatsby at the party. The rumors and stories influence the idea of Gatsby that Nick creates in his mind which differs from who Gatsby appears to be.

During one of the key scenes in the novel in the ------ hotel, Nick, his narration and point of view once again allow more of an insight to Gatsby, which allows my admiration to grow. If not for Nick, and his input in the events, many people would see Gatsby as a sly shallow liar who invents stories merely to entertain acquaintances. Instead of this however, nick says,

The Great Gatsby was written during the 1920s, which is also known as the Roaring Twenties. In the narrative F. Scott Fitzgerald gave a critical view of this time. In the 1920s and the 1930s there was a lot going on, for example bootlegging, drinking, criminal activity, and an evolution of jazz music. The women were also going through an evolution, in 1920 they got the right to vote and since then they changed a lot and they became known as Flappers. Women not only wanted to take care of their families but also wanted to have a career. “The independent New Woman, who rejected marriage for career and political action who often rooted her emotional life […] was gradually discredited. In her place came the flapper, who celebrated her sexual independence

In one of the most overt cases, Nick’s lack of neutrality is evident when he condemns Jordan, his professional golfer girlfriend, as “incurably dishonest” for cheating in her first golf tournament, while pardoning Gatsby for his criminal connections (58, 2). Both Jordan’s dishonesty and Gatsby’s relationship with Wolfshiem have nefarious intent; in fact, Wolfshiem’s moral negligence far surpasses Jordan’s. Yet, Nick fabricates a rationale to excuse Gatsby’s partnership and illegal actions even while passing judgement on Jordan for a lesser crime. Perhaps, Nick simply cannot see the similarities between the two cases; either way, Nick shows a preference for his friends. This inclination leads Nick to declare Gatsby “worth the whole damn bunch [of East Eggers] put together” (154). Nick’s report comes two years after the events in the book, which is enough time for Nick to form concrete images of everyone. These perceptions that Nick creates colors the way he thinks of each person when he tells the story, making him biased towards some members. The outburst displays Nick’s conviction that Gatsby is the victim, even though Gatsby - both a criminal and attempted adulterer - is not without fault. Nick’s emotional investment in Gatsby’s perception confirms his unreliability. In the end, Nick inability to set aside his own emotions causes his own perspective to become compromised and untrustworthy as a complete overview of the events leading to Gatsby’s

One thing that surprises me about Nick is that he was loyal to Gatsby who seemed likeable enough but empty inside. He seemed like the picture was more important than the real person. Nick was interested in person and would put himself in a bad light to help a friend. “I didn’t want to go to the city. I wasn’t worth a decent stroke

Social stratification is depicted in the film through the different classes of characters. These characters are in one of three classes; old money, new money, and no money. Tom, Daisy, and Jordan are in the old money class because they have inherited their families’ wealth and status. Gatsby is in the new money class because his family is not inherently wealthy. Myrtle is in the no money class because she does not have status or wealth. The old money class believes themselves to be the elite and the most refined, therefore those in the new money class will never be viewed as their equals because they have not been born with status. In the portrayal of Tom’s affair with Myrtle, he acts as if he is above her because of his social standing. Gatsby asks Daisy why she didn’t wait for him and married Tom. She replies, “Rich girls don’t marry poor boys, Jay Gatsby.” This reinforces the idea that those in the old money class believe themselves to be the elite

Although to Nick, Gatsby seems at once completely unoriginal, extremely knowable, being with him, he notes, was "like skimming hastily through a dozen magazines” (Fitzgerald 55). Gatsby, in Nick’s point of view, was disruptive. He is unable to trust Gatsby, for a fear that he would just vanish at the moment in which a promise leans toward its fulfillment.

The Roaring Twenties is considered to be a time of excessive celebration and immense corruption. The novel, The Great Gatsby, by F. Scott Fitzgerald is a criticism of American society and its values during this era of history. This criticism is first apparent in the people who go to Gatsby's parties. They get absurdly drunk, do not know who their host is and are rude by excessively gossiping about him. This commentary is also shown in the corruption of the police. Gatsby is able to pay off the police so that the activities going on at his home will go unnoticed and so that he may behave as he wishes. This criticism is finally shown in the corruption of friendship and love, the simple fact being that there is none. People use Gatsby and