Criticisms on the Studies of World History Essay

1989 Words 8 Pages
In the late twentieth century, the study of world history has emerged to allow both historians and students to understand the world from a global perspective. World history is viewed to be part of the academic field than the research field. According to Charles Hedrick, author of The Ethics of World History, Western civilization was the main course taught in schools and universities before world history became part of the curriculum. The need to understand the world in a broader perspective compared to a Western perspective made the study of world history popular in the United States. Historians approached the study of world history with a thematic approach to understand the integration and difference between people and major events of the world. The subject of world history is broad and as a result is open to many interpretations. In addition, world historians faced difficulties in connecting the past while trying to appeal to all the perspectives of other cultures. These challenges made it difficult for historians to agree with a global framework to understand world history, without being ignorant of other cultures. As a result, historians approached world history differently and developed multiple directions such as a patriotic, Marxist, postcolonial and the ecumenical approach in order to meet the criteria. Criticisms arose from the different approaches on world history. Historians questioned and criticized the study of world history because the different approaches…