preview

Critiquing Pickles King And Belan's Study

Decent Essays

INTRODUCTION This essay will be critiquing Pickles, King and Belan’s study of nursing students’ attitudes to caring for patients with HIV and/or AIDS (2012) by evaluating each component of the paper, including the credibility of the authors, literature review, research aim, methodology, sample, ethical considerations, data collection and analysis, results and conclusions. Finally, the relevance of the research to nursing practice will be considered. Understanding research is essential for nurses as this ensures that the most up-to-date, safe and effective care is given. In addition to this, The Code (Nursing and Midwifery Council, 2015) states that any advice or information given to a service user must be based on the best available evidence, which should be based on “methodologically sound [and] clinically relevant” research (DiCenso, Guyatt and Ciliska, 2005, p. 4). By understanding and critically reviewing research, nurses are able to select research upon which they can base their clinical decisions (Gelling, 2010). TITLE, …show more content…

Her report also claims that the credibility of the authors can inform the reader of the credibility of the paper as a whole, suggesting that the authors should not only be qualified in the research area, but should also have experience and knowledge of the practice area in question. The researchers of this paper have listed their workplace but have not included their job titles or qualifications; this makes assessing the competence of the researchers difficult. The abstract of this paper (titled ‘Summary’ within the text) is succinct and outlines the research aim, sample, methodology, results and conclusions. This ensures that the reader can quickly decide whether the study is of interest, according to Ryan, Coughlan & Cronin’s critique framework

Get Access