Croc Analysis

flexible, retailer focused supply chain system enabling Crocs to support a boarder retail base than competitors;

CROCS have some competitors: TBL, NKE, DECK and so on. All of these competitors have strong abilities. For example, in NKE’ 2010 annual report, great spirits of innovation and inspiration have been showed. What’s more, NKE got a great development during the year: NKE delivered record profitability. NKE not only pay attention to the quality, but also attach importance to comfort and appearance. Wearing NKE always makes people feel comfortable and sporting.

When a certain point is reached regarding a company’s success, a set of different opportunities arise and partnerships may unfold. However, with every possible strategy available, risks and benefits also come into play; without discarding any of them beforehand, every option is a strong candidate until a final decision is made. In this case study we will analyze the current business strategy pertaining

With revenue from Crocs shoe sales reaching to $680 million in 2007, it is clear that the company has developed a successful strategy. Not all of the success can be contributed to the design of the product. Although their products were in high demand, there are more underlying factors that have paved the way for Crocs to be competitive in the shoe market. Crocs’ supply chain design and use of vertical integration revolutionized speed and quality of order fulfillment.

a.State what you believe is the distinctive competence and core competence of your selected company.

Be more aggressive in their marketing strategy. One of the reasons why Crocs got so ahead because they were very aggressive in terms of sales and marketing strategies. They need to target more overseas clients, as North America is already dominated by Crocs. They should also work harder at distributing to more retail stores in North America.

2. How have Deere’s business strategy choices strengthened or weakened its competitive position in the agricultural and construction equipment industries?

After acquiring, Newell would get the service level of each business to their standards as fast as possible to make sure that these businesses do not damage its reputation. Thus association of brand name to Newell highly enhanced the individual companies inside Newell’s portfolio to be of good service and fast distribution. Other than these factors, the acquisition of different companies might bring in different skills and synergies to complementing goods such as production knowledge and complementary assets. Companies that produce complementary products are able to know what exactly to produce that would suit their customers, while companies producing differentiated products of the same category would be able to learn from each other to produce better products for each customer segment. Companies of similar nature are also consolidated and the plants upgraded to increase manufacturing efficiency which will benefit these companies in the cost aspect.

Crocs, Inc., is indeed a Colorado creator of unique clogs that became popular for the outdoor person in the late 1990s with both men, women, and children. These inexpensive shoes rely on a proprietary resin material called Croslite. This helps produce a slip-resistant and non-marking sole. The material also softens with body heat activation. This helps for molding the shoe to the foot and providing a conforming fit. Crocs was meant for guys on boats and in other outdoor activities like fishing and gardening, because the material of the shoe allows the foot to breathe. Crocs are also used by working men and women who spend much time on their feet. For example, health care and restaurant workers. Also, Crocs are widely considered

The lesson learned from this is that sometimes it is easier and faster reach a new market via joint venture, even though the profit will be less, but the company can save a lot of money in studying the new market trying to understand the new culture and how they purchase and also it can minimize the risk because there is a national brand supporting the new international brand, which gives confidence and security to the customers.

The core problem is about their management style in top level. With such a highly efficient production line plant, the company 's management is like a job-shop, the executives take charge of every small decision of almost everyone. This greatly weakens the possibility to expand, because the one or two top management are not available dealing with so many daily issues. In addition, due to the size and life-long

of the joint venture would benefit both companies if the terms of the agreement were favorable for both parties. It is also noted in the case that Sakari had

Personally, I don’t think that expanding only by acquisition is a good idea in the long run. Because, more often than not, the strategic assets of the firm being acquired and the firm that is acquiring are not in complete sync with each other. Also, I believe that expanding through acquisition is not a continous process and hence, the resultant bursts of extra demand that is generated might adversely impact the core competencies of Crocs which is its excellent supply chain network. It is of paramount importance for Crocs to ensure that its traditional core competencies are used to the maximum even after

It is because through the joint venture, the company is more familiar with the situation of the company there. The negative outcome is that the management system different between the company. So it is hard to make a decision making. It is because there is different opinion of each person.

According to Griffin & Pustay (2005), a core competency is a distinctive strength or advantage that is central to a firm¡¦s operations, and by utilising its core competency in new markets, the firm is able to increase