Cruelty In Lord Of The Flies Analysis

In the beginning of the novel, Ralph was elected as the leader and Jack was jealous because he lost in the election. Thinking of it, he pushes his boundaries by hunting. The first time he tried he was unable to kill but then it became his main interest. It made him begin to build the urge to kill other creatures. Only moments later, Jack makes his first kill. “There were lashings of blood,” said Jack,laughing and shuddering, “you should have seen it!” (page 69) this shows the first step Jack developing to savagery which losses his innocence. As the story goes on, Jack creates a tribe like dictatorship that made the boys uncivilized. This leads to the cruelty of Jack which clearly states that the presentation of both protagonist and antagonist leads differently. Jack successfully ruled the boys. He punished the boys with is evil and good purposes. This made them become more and more violent. Since they became violent, an incident happen, and that was they killed Simon. “The beast struggled forward, broke the ring and fell over the steep edge of the rock to the sand by the water. At once the crowd surged after it, poured down the rock, leapt on to the beast, screamed,struck, bit,

The influence of a corrupted power seeking leader is all it can take for any innocent person to begin to perform savage like behaviors. The author William Golding demonstrates in, The Lord of the Flies, through a group of British boys that become stranded on a deserted island where they are forced to fend for themselves and try to create a stable self-governing system. In specific, Roger illustrates changes on the island; by becoming more violent, as his evil motives turn from innocent to dealthy. Which is shown, as he picks on the younger boys, showing overly-aggressive behavior while hunting, and his final push towards the dark side when he kills piggy.

The need for civilization, innocence and loss of power is shown through the impaled pig's head. In order for the group to survive, animals must be killed in order for the boys to eat. Jack takes on the role of hunter because he enjoys killing living things, as seen when he states, “Kill the pig! Cut his throat! Kill the pig! Bash him in!” (104) Ralph is a more calm person and does not enjoy killing as much as Jack, although he takes a small part in killing the pig. However, in the end, Jack gains all the power because everyone looks up to him as leader because he attempts to hunt the pig throughout the novel and is successful in the end. “We’ll take the meat along the beach.” “Pick up the pig,” Jack said. (150) Meanwhile, Ralph doubts Jack's abilities to kill the pig, and constantly mocks him about being successful. “He tried to convey the compulsion to track down and kill that was swallowing him up.”(51) Jack proves Ralph wrong and kills the pig. “Jack begins to dance and his laughter became a bloodthirsty snarling."(58) He celebrates

Throughout many parts of the United States, there is a time of the year known as “fire season.” Because of a lack of water during this time, dead plant matter littered across the forest floor start to shrivel up, until they’re practically begging to be lit on fire. During this season, a single ember can ignite a wildfire capable of searing through hundreds of acres of forest. Just like this powerful, heat-ridden ember, a single act of cruelty can ignite even worse, more pitiless acts. In Lord of the Flies, William Golding demonstrates how cruelty gives power to perpetrators and victimizes the weak, He shows that cruelty lies in the heart of every person and child and that it is most prevalent in a society that lacks a penalty system.

He even goes on to imply that killing is more important than being rescued when he says: “all the same, I’d like to catch a pig first,” while Ralph notices “a mad look… [in] his eyes.” Jack and his followers fall so deep into the darkness that they murder an innocent boy: Simon. As the boys chant, “Kill the beast! Cut his throat! Spill his blood,’ Jack leads them on to kill “the beast” which is actually Simon. The next day Jack goes on to beat another child and shows no remorse for anything that he has done. That is when it is apparent to readers that he has officially lost all humanity and is completely savage. Golding is showing that anyone, even a young child, if pushed far enough, can give in to that evil inside them. Everyone has a choice, but some seem to give in a little easier than others.

In William Golding’s The Lord of the Flies, Jack and others use their acts of cruelty towards the other boys to show a sense of power and role on the island higher than everyone else’s. In the book, Jack and his choir are obsessed and driven to find and kill a pig. While killing the pig they chant, “Kill the pig! Cut its throat! Kill the pig! Spill her blood!”. These words are evidently an act of cruelty because they could have simply killed the pig quietly and civilly. However, by chanting and frolicing about, they were given the power they had desired through cruelty. After successfully killing a quantity of pigs, the author states, “The Compulsion to track down and kill was swallowing him up”, meaning that he desires to kill because

William Golding’s book Lord of the Flies focuses mainly on a group of boys’ who have been stranded on an uninhabited island where they face many problems with themselves and others. One of the many dilemma’s within this story was the division of power between Ralph and Jack. They both had qualities of a leader, but they had different intentions with where they wanted to go; Jack was primarily the villain in this story showing savagery, while Ralph was civilized. So, why do the boys’ join someone who is cruel? Jack knows that he can manipulate their fears and use activities that are relatable to them because they are still little kids. Although it might seem devious, Jack is intelligent by using these tactics because they prove to be

In many parts of the world, humans live in a civilized society where law and order are organized and enforced. But within a lawless society, savagery surfaces in an ungoverned setting of bloodshed and harm. In Lord of the Flies by William Golding, Civility and Savagery are differentiated with Ralph and Jack, Ralph establishes a community compared to Jack who damage and divide civilization. Because of how Jack and Ralph use their democratic and dictatorial authority, through the examples of the declined civilization, the increase of savagery and the different ways of power by Ralph and Jack.

It’s WWII times and you’re on a plane when the plane suddenly crashes onto a remote island. You and everyone one else that had survived the crash are not even adults, barely even teenagers at the matter. The only way to stay alive is to not give into the temptation of evil that is growing with you and the other boys’ hearts. Welcome to the life of Ralph on Conch Island from Lord of The Flies by William Golding. He has to try and stay alive while dealing with a not so physically adapt ally and a pack of monsters society would call little boys. The only way to control them is with a conch until the boys, hopefully, get saved unless the monster destroys them all. That monster, of course, is the evil within everyone’s hearts.

Lord of the Flies by William Golding is an allegory in regards to the generalization that when man wants power, man loses empathy. When empathy is lost, humanity is also lost and hopes for civilization vanish. Jack’s hunt for power and his willingness to take control any way he can shows the lack of humanity within him. Roger starts off as an innocent boy, but when no consequences are displayed for his actions his inner sadist reveals itself. Jack and Roger’s decline of empathy during their hunts reveals the inner savagery of man when power becomes the priority over a return to civilization.

Lord of the Flies, an allegorical novel by William Golding, holds truths about mankind’s true nature of existence. The novel explores the savagery in all men that lies dormant, yet when society’s rules cease to exist, the boy’s innocence perishes along with it. The boys attempt to band together and mock the society that they came from, but not understanding the complexity of the situation, results in their society falling into ruins. On the island the boys are returned to man’s primitive nature, without rules or discipline, and they slowly drift into anarchy. Without proper guidance, the boys resort to cloaking their innocence with body paint to survive. With the body paint coating their skin, the boys bury their old personas within and allow themselves to commit acts that society would frown upon. When Jack’s tribe uses the facade of body paint to dissociate themselves from civilization’s morals, they denote that hiding one’s true identity liberates them from the constraints of society.

Civilization is the desire for less pain, less chaos, and less malevolence to exist on Earth (metaphor). Without the law and order of civilization, the inherent evil that exists in all humans challenges the systems of society. In Lord of the Flies, William Golding explores the pessimistic side of a group of British boys, who in the depths of World War II, crash onto a deserted tropical island, where without civilization, the downfall to savagery is unmistakable. Ralph, who the boys elect as their leader, establishes rules and emphasizes the importance of the signal fire, but Jack, who wants to preside over the boys, neglects the rules Ralph sets in place and coerces Samneric to do away with the upkeep of the fire and hunt instead. The boys miss an opportunity for rescue when the fire burns out, but Jack, remorseless due to his pursuit for power, arranges a new tribe, in which he uses the fear of the “beast” to gain followers. In a world without enforced rules and consequences, Jack leads his group into a complete state of savagery as they kill Simon, and later on, Roger, a member of his tribe, kills Piggy. Unrestrained evil continues to spread as the tribe sets the island on fire in an attempt to kill Ralph, but fails to completely take over the island as a naval officer rescues them. William Golding utilizes the symbol of the conch shell, which represents law and order, throughout Lord of the Flies to reveal that without the rules of

Jack shows that cruelty is learned and not innate because throughout the novel, he progressively becomes more cruel. In the beginning, Jack was confident in himself for he was the head chorister and leader of his choir (Golding 22). When he along with Ralph and Simon stumbled upon a pig late in the first chapter, he hesitated to kill it. The book reads: “They knew very well why he hadn’t: because of the enormity of the knife descending and cutting into living

The fear of crashing on a deserted island becomes a reality for a group of young boys in William Golding’s Lord of the Flies. Without the presence of an adult figure, Jack and Ralph begin to battle for power as the boys deal with getting off the island and fearing the unknown beast. As the hopes of being rescued start to subside, many boys slip into inevitable savagery, commiting devilish acts. Man’s state of evil is most apparent within Jack, yet Ralph, who seems to remain uncorrupted, still participates in savage acts, proving that man is ultimately evil.

William Golding’s novel, Lord of the Flies, touches upon a subject that society often disregards. A subject that not only questions a person’s rationality, but also their innocence. And that subject is how far one can go with their cruelty. The novel itself focuses on a group of boys who struggle to establish an orderly civilization amongst themselves without any sign of adults around, all alone on an island. While following these boys, the author allows his audience to witness how, under the right circumstances, easy it is to succumb to the dysfunctional practices of a savage. From their looks all the way to their contrasting personalities, one might describe their transformations as drastic. Therefore, it is through the boys’ acts of savagery that Golding explains that the disruption of rational behavior and lack of concern for one another are the results of cruelty.