Csa Concentration Varied Between Rounds ( Table 1 )

20 ul of DNA was added to 20ul of Master Mix. The Master Mix contained primers, dNTPs, Mg2+, Taq DNA polymerase, and yellow dye. Both the DNA and Master Mix were mixed with the micropipette. The DNA was then put into the thermal cycler containing 40 cycles of PCR amplification, amounting to 3.5 hours of amplification.

The vital components and techniques of gene cloning are as follows, the DNA sequence that contains the desired gene (EZH2) is amplified by Polymerase chain reaction. PCR was established by Kary Mullis in 1985, popularly known to amplify target sequences of DNA (EZH2) to a billion fold in several hours using thermophilic polymerases (Taq) ,primers and other cofactors (Sambrook and Russell, 2001). Three crucial steps are involved which are Denaturation (at 95°), Annealing of the forward and reverse primers (55-65°) and lastly primer extension (at 72°). After amplification the desired sequence is integrated into the circular vector (pbluescript) forming the recombinant molecule. For the compatibility of the insert and vector, both were digested with (EcoR1) so the same cohesive ends are generated in both, making it easier to ligate. EcoR1 is a restriction enzyme that belongs to the type II endonuclease class which cuts within dsDNA at its recognition site “GAATTC” (Clark 2010; Sambrook and Russell, 2001).

Four microcentrifuge tubes were placed in a rack, labeled and numbered, in order to identify the group and the DNA/restriction enzyme that it held. Each of the tubes initially received 10 microliters of reaction buffer. There were two samples of suspect DNA provided along with two restriction enzymes (EcoRI and HindIII). Tubes labeled 1 and 2 received 15 μL of DNA from suspect one while tubes 3 and 4 received 15 μL of DNA from suspect two. Following that, 15 μL of Enzyme 1 (EcoRI) were added to tubes 1 and 3, and 15 μL of Enzyme 2 (HindIII) were added to tubes 2 and 4. (Table 1). The tubes were then gently tapped on the counter to mix the DNA and enzyme solution followed by incubation at 37°C for 45 minutes. After incubation, 5 μL of 10x gel loading dye were added to each of the four tubes of suspect DNA. The tubes were then placed on ice while the gel was under preparation.

Requirments: The total reaction volume was 10 μL, containing 1 μL of 10× LightCycler DNA Master Hybridization enzyme mixture (Roche Diagnostics), 3 mM MgCl2, 0.1 μM hybridization probes, and ARMS primers.

There were several steps used to acquire the colony necessary for the PCR. First a student forearm was swabbed using a cotton swab, the cells were then placed in an agar plate. DNA was then extracted from the cultured bacteria by using a technique to lyse the cells and solubilize the DNA, then enzymes were used to remove contaminating proteins. The DNA extraction consisted of a lysis buffer that contained high concentrations of salt for denaturing. Binding with the use of ethanol and a washing step to purify the DNA. The final step for the DNA extraction was elution where the pure DNA was release. Proceeding the extraction of DNA the results of the 16s gene amplification were examined through gel electrophoresis it was analyzed by estimating the size of the PCR bands with marker bands. After measuring the success of the extraction, a technique called TA cloning was started. Cloning of PCR products was done by using partially purified amplified products with

Figure 1 Gel Electrophoresis for Replication Taster PTC. The gel is composed of an ethidium bromide stained 3% agarose gel demonstrating DNA fragments which were a depiction of PCR amplification. The agarose gel contains nine loading samples, including from left to right, the MW marker lane 1 precision mol mass standard, lane 2 TB undigested PTC (5µl of DNA, 5µl of master mix P, and 2.5µl of loading dye), lane 3 TB digested PTC (5µl of DNA, 5µl of master mix P, 2µl Fnu4HI, and 3µl of loading dye), lane 4 TB A(L)DH G (10µl DNA, 10µl master mix G, and 5µl loading dye), lane 5 TB A(L)DH A (10µl DNA, 10µl master mix A, and 5µl loading dye), lane 6 MG undigested PTC (5µl of DNA, 5µl of master mix P, and 2.5µl of loading dye), lane 7 MG digested PTC (5µl of DNA, 5µl of master mix P, 2µl Fnu4HI, and 3µl of loading dye), lane 8 MG A(L)DH G (10µl DNA, 10µl master mix G, and 5µl loading dye), lane 9 MG A(L)DH A (10µl DNA, 10µl master mix A, and 5µl loading dye).

This was completed with over 65 tissue samples from various locations. The analysis was performed with quantitative PCR, using fluorescent signals.

The DNA extraction results, along with the PCR product, did not fare well. There was not enough product produced to be viable in the later stages of the experiment, so a backup was used in place of the original product.

A PCR tube containing a Ready-To-Go™ PCR Bead was supplemented with 22.5 microliters of a solution containing TASR38-specific primers. 2.5µL of the mixture were added to the primer mixture, and the sample was stored in ice until the entire group had finished the process up to this point. The entire group’s samples of DNA were denatured for 20 seconds at 95°C, then incubated for 20 seconds at 64°C so that the primers could anneal, then incubated at 20 seconds at 72°C, and then polished for five minutes at

Our materials for the extraction of DNA included: the screwcap tubes, capless tubes, pipet tips, disposable transfer pipets, a foam microtube holder, a DI water bottle, a sharpie to label, a hot water bath, Non-GMO food, Test food, and a centrifuge. Our materials for the setup of the PCR reactions included: PCR tubes, screwcap tubes, pipet tips, an aerosol barrier, a foam microtube holder, a PCR tube holder, a 2-20 microliter micropipette, an ice bath, a sharpie to label, a plastic bag, a styrofoam cup with ice water, and a black tray with ice water. Finally, the materials for the electrophoresis of the PCR products included: Agarose gel, PCR sample tubes from previous labs, PCR tube holders, running buffers (300-350 ml), loading dye, a PCR molecular weight

The results for this particular lab were accurate; however, inaccuracies could arise from contamination of the PCR reagents, a degraded DNA template, incorrect temperatures during PCR, pipetting errors, or mistakes in the preparation of the gel agarose. For instance, if the ethidium bromide were not added to the gel then the results would not be visible under UV light. If the DNA template were degraded then the DNA would not be amplified during PCR, thus there would be no results to observe on the gel. Contaminated PCR

Total RNA was extracted using the Trizol extraction kit (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). First-Strand Synthesis System for RT-PCR (Invitrogen) was used to synthesize cDNA from 1.5 μg total RNA according to the oligo (dT) version of the protocol. Real-time PCR was performed using CFX Fast real-time PCR system (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., Hercules, CA). The following cycle parameters were used for all experiments: 20s at 94°C, 30s at 60°C, and 30s at 72°C for a total of 45 cycles. The relative level of mRNA for a specific gene was normalized to GAPDH levels. Table 1 shows the sequences for all primer sets used in these

The results from this experiment are inconclusive as the 1% agarose gel using 142S primers did not display any bands (data not shown). The 142S transgene should be present in the 142S line only. In the control gel (Fig 3), there are bands in every lane; actin is used as the loading control, showing the PCR and gels were run according to standard procedures.

All DNA tests were changed in accordance with 100 ng/μl. A 1000 ng (1 μl) aliquot of every example's DNA was utilized for a 50 μl PCR response. The 16S all inclusive eubac-terial preliminaries 530F (5'- GTG CCA GCM GCN GCG G) and 1100R (5'- GGG TTN CGN TCG TTG) were utilized for increasing the 600 bp area of 16S rRNA qualities. HotStar Taq Plus Master Mix Kit (QIAGEN Inc.) was utilized for PCR under the accompanying condi-tions: 94°C for 3 min took after by 32 cycles of 94°C for 30 sec; 60°C for 40 sec and 72°C for 1 min; and a last prolongation venture at 72°C for 5 min. A second-ary PCR was performed for FLX (Roche, Nutley, NJ) amplicon sequencing under the same condition by using designed special fusion primers with differ-ent tag sequences: LinkerA-Tags-530F and LinkerB-1100R. The resultant individual sample after parsing the tags into individual FASTA files was assembled using CAP3. The ace files generated by CAP3 were then processed to generate a secondary FASTA file containing the tentative consensus (TC) sequences of the assembly along with the number of reads in-tegrated into each consensus. The TC was required to have at least a 3-fold coverage. The resulting TC FASTA for each sample was then evaluated using BLASTn (Altschul et al., 1990) against a custom data-base derived from the RDP-II database (Cole et al., 2005) and GenBank website (http://www.ncbi.nlm. nih.gov/). The sequences contained within the

RNA isolation for sequencing, qRT –PCR and Ago2-IP for NB was performed, using miRNeasy Mini kit, from Qiagen, according to manufacturer’s instructions, as described in the handbook for