Businesses, specifically larger corporations, play a major role in what occurs in society therefore, they are responsible to their stakeholders not only to pursue economic goals but the greater social good as well. Corporate social responsibility (CSR) means that a corporation should act in a way that enhances society and its inhabitants and be held accountable for any of its actions that affect people, their communities, and their environment. (Lawrence, 2010). Social responsibility is becoming the norm so much so that some businesses have incorporated it into their business model. There are three components of the bottom line of social
HSBC believes that Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) is a dictum that their organization and all its constituents live by (“CSR is engrained in HSBC’s corporate DNA” 2006). Therefore, in addition
Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) is something that affects all companies and should be an active factor in the company’s decision making. It is something all corporations need to care about. CSR is when business’ or corporations take part in an initiative or campaign for a cause that will benefit society and/or in some way make the world a better place (Taylor, 2015). Initially, Corporate Social Responsibility started to take shape around the 1950’s, but some say that it dates all the way back to the 1800s, the idea of CSR was seen (Carroll, 2007). One may think that because it is dated so long ago, it doesn’t have an important impact today nevertheless, it is proven that Corporate Social Responsibility is a pathway for entities to self benefit as they are in the process of benefitting society.
Barclays PLC, formerly known as Barclays Limited Bank implemented financial industries and sustainability which focuses on profit, environment and the people. Barclays PLC focused on environment thru carbon, palm oil and mining. The environment focuses on priorities to target carbon, waste and paper. Barclays made decisions on palm oil depending on the effect to the environment and the employment opportunities to the people. Barclays concentrates on social aspects of the triple bottom-line and sustainability. Barclays focuses on ethical and social principles thru the implementation of respect and value of its workers, integrity and servicing customers. Barclays feels that if the workers are working together they will be able to provide a better service to the customers. Barclays has a variety of programs that benefit the developing companies and the people. The programs include “Building Young Futures” and “Barclays Spaces for Sports.” Barclays integrates retail and banking, investments and wealth management unto their company. Barclays meets the needs of all financial stakeholders and impacts long and short term of the company’s decision making. Lastly, Barclays focuses on wealth management providing clients with wealth advisors to assist clients to manage their accounts, pensions and properties.
Drawing from these debates, Archie Carroll has developed “the Pyramid of Corporate Social Responsibility”, one of the most significant concepts of CSR. There are four kinds of social responsibilities that contribute total CSR, he suggested, Economic, Legal, Ethical, and Philanthropic (1991). Therefore being socially responsible does not mean forgetting the fundamental aspect of business, to make profit. The obligation of Law restricts business activities and they are the rules of the game which businesses have to obey. Being ethical is to perform actions that are fair, morally good, and of stakeholders’ interests, even outside the boundary of law. Considering corporate citizenship, philanthropic responsibilities are responses to the rising society’s expectations to business (Carroll, 1991). The notion of discretionary and voluntary distinguishes philanthropic responsibilities to ethical responsibilities. A good CSR firm should “strive to make a profit, obey the law, be ethical, and be a good corporate citizen” (Carroll, 1991, p.43) and without simultaneous fulfillment of the four responsibilities, the business should not be characterized as operating within CSR.
“Studies analysing the bottom-line value of CSR have demonstrated that it adds substantial economic and social returns to businesses when it is carefully thought out, executed, and periodically evaluated as part of a holistic institutional policy” (Deegan, 2002; Hummels and Timme, 2004). The bank should also invest in social responsible activities to differentiate it, which can help in emphasizing Jyske’s values and differences and encouraging ethical behaviour amongst its stakeholders. These activities might seem subtle, but they have proven to be forceful signals that improve the brand image and communicate goodwill to customers. They also influence perceptions of the service quality and affects loyalty
The term ‘corporate social responsibility’ is still in popular use, even though competing, complementary and overlapping concepts such as corporate citizenship, business ethics, stakeholder management and sustainability are all vying to become the most accepted and widespread descriptor of the field. At the same time, the concept of corporate social performance (CSP) has become an established umbrella term which embraces both the descriptive and normative aspects of the field, as well as placing an emphasis on all that firms are achieving or accomplishing in the realm of social responsibility policies, practices and results. In the final analysis, however, all these concepts are related, in that they are integrated by key, underlying themes such as value, balance and accountability (Schwartz and Carroll 2008), and CSR remains a dominant, if not exclusive, term in the academic literature and in business practice. Just to illustrate how the concept is always evolving, CSR International, a non-profit organization, announced in 2009 the birth celebration of CSR International, an exciting new organization supporting the transition from what it called the ‘old CSR’ (Corporate Social Responsibility) or CSR 1.0 to the ‘new CSR’ (Corporate Sustainability & Responsibility) or CSR 2.0. Whether CSR 2.0 turns out to be substantially different
Corporate social responsibility has been one the key business buzz words of the 21st century. Consumers' discontent with the corporation has forced it to try and rectify its negative image by associating its name with good deeds. Social responsibility has become one of the corporation's most pressing issues, each company striving to outdo the next with its philanthropic image. People feel that the corporation has done great harm to both the environment and to society and that with all of its wealth and power, it should be leading the fight to save the Earth, to combat poverty and illness and etc. "Corporations are now expected to deliver the good, not just the goods; to pursue
This Task aims at providing the reader with information on the organisational and environmental audit of Barclays, as well as the importance of its stakeholders through a stakeholder analysis and provision of potential new strategies to the organisation.
Corporate social responsibility is becoming a key initiative and an essential tool in the growth of multinational corporations and the development of third world countries throughout the globe. The two concepts can work hand in hand to provide benefits for all; however difficulties in regulating and implementing corporate social responsibility need to be overcome before effective changes can be made.
Corporate social responsibility brings a new perspective to the societal role of enterprise, while recognizing the relationship between profitability, ethical and environmental standards of the company. The position of companies in society is a subject of constant change. People today do not perceive the company only as producers or suppliers of the products that reach only for maximizing profits, but they assume that the company will meet the requirements of the other areas as well, such as the legal environment and that it will support development of other activities beneficial for the society.
Corporate social responsibility (CSR) as defined by Carroll (1979) refers to the inclusion of moral, lawful and economical obligations that is expected of a business by the society (Brtitzelmaier, Kraus 2012). Organisations are expected to act responsibly, but many would agree that their actions and policies do have a direct or indirect effect on the society at large and the environment. The success of most organisations is dependent on their corporate
“According to Carroll (1983), “corporate social responsibility involves the conduct of business so that it is economically profitable, law abiding, ethical and socially supportive. To be socially responsible then means that profitability and obedience to the law are foremost conditions when discussing the firm’s ethics and the extent to which it supports the society in which it exists with contributions of money, time and talent (p.608).”
Corporate social responsibility “refers to business practices involving initiatives that benefit society” (Caramela, 2016). Categories of social responsibility can be environmental efforts, philanthropy, ethical labor practices, or volunteer work. Organizations need to be more socially responsibility than ever before in order for their businesses and the world to be able to have maximum sustainability. "Sustainability isn 't just important for people and the planet, but also is vital for business success… Communities are grappling with problems that are global in scope and structurally multifaceted — Ebola, persistent poverty, climate change. The business case for engaging in corporate social responsibility is clear and unmistakable” (Caramela, 2016). Corporate social responsibility is becoming a major priority for strategic development by corporations around the world. Management needs to take great care in understanding the relationship between the activities of their organizations, customers, the community, the government, the environment, and employees.
‘Corporate social responsibility’ (CSR) means that the firm has wider responsibilities in relation to objectives and people apart from the owners or shareholders (Beal and Goyen 2005). These responsibilities are achieved when the firm adapts all of its practices to ensure that it operates in ways that meet, or exceed, the ethical, legal, commercial and public expectations that society has of business. Objectives often associated with CSR include a responsibility to manage natural assets sustainably and not to pollute by chemical discharge, smell, noise, dust or other irritants; fair treatment of employees and ethical attitude towards clients. The other people include employees, customers, suppliers,