Cultural Relativism And The Nature Of Truth Essay

1338 WordsDec 9, 20166 Pages
The nature of truth can be defined as intangible in the sense that it can be objectively based or relatively based. Upon the subject of moralism, there are two classic positions: universalism or objectivism and cultural relativism. The idea of cultural relativism is often used to explain the differences in practices and ideologies between cultures. Cultural relativists emphasizes the element of relativity in relation to a person’s values in the sense that the truth is dependent on or a function of a person’s cultural traditions (Brandt, 2006, p. 1). Even expanding above the notion of personal values, cultural relativism advocates for relativity in terms of ethics. This view ultimately rejects a single “correct” set of general ethical principles or ethical truth. Cultural relativism enables moral differences between cultures to be all acceptable and right depending on context. This means that moral concepts can come across as morally wrong for a group in one context and pass as morally right for another in other contexts. Though I recognize the relevance of cultural relativism in establishing that it is possible to have some variations in the frameworks of truth, I will ultimately argue for moral universalism, also known as moral objectivism. Mitchell Silver (2011) summarizes moral universalism as the following; “a single set of principles determines the permissibility of any action, and the correctness of any judgment regarding an action’s permissibility” (p. 1). Simply put,
Open Document