Cultural Synthesis Essay

Moral Relativism is classified under any positions concerning the differences in moral judgments between people and the culture. Moral relativism is the position that ethical or moral propositions make claims regarding cultural or personal circumstances. Moral Relativism affirms relative form of validation of moral statements but doesn’t deny them. Moral relativist typically view the ethical standards of right or wrong are culturally based and are issued to a person's individual decision. Instead of making their decision on “what is right,” decisions are based on self-interest. This procedure has a negative impact on behavior and will affected the way we treat others.

They use sayings such as “he is lucky he got a trial” or “we arn’t suppose to belive this kid knowing what he is” or “even these stuff kids should all be locked up”. They speak very negatively with out even knowing the boy. The book states along with attitudes prejudice also has a cognitive aspect which is called stereotypes and a behaviour aspect which is discrimination. Stereotypes are assumptions we make that all members of a group have the same characteristics. The moment we see stereotypes brought up in the movie is when we find out the young man in question is from the slums.

Cultural Relativism implies that culture decides what is moral or immoral. This belief defines in some ways a boundary to morals where objectivism failed. Several religions homosexuals are considered immoral and are judge according to the belief

The overall aspect of the movie was racism found in everyday life not just to one race but also to many other races. Many families of different cultures were shown for example, Daniel represented the Hispanic heritage, and Anthony signified the African American race, Dorri and her father as Persians. Each family faced racial and ethnic discrimination and as the textbook states “Many members of the dominant group do not acknowledge the existence of external impingements that make it much more

Cultural relativism refers to the view that ethical systems or moral actions that are perceived to vary across cultural diversity are all equal and valid and as such, no one culture is better than the other is. For instance, by taking how words are used in one culture to mean a thing, the same words may be employed in a different culture to mean another thing. Another example is prayer announcements in Saudi Arabia can be heard from far distance which legal. Even if that may disturb your neighbors who are not Muslims. However, in United States such thing is illegal and consider a noise violation.

Cultural relativism is not Objectivism, which is a moral theory that states that there are certain moral standards that everyone should follow regardless of their opinion and indifference towards them. Cultural relativism is one of the two forms of Ethical Relativism. The latter one belongs to a form of moral skepticism. It states that moral standards are not objective, but relative to the standards of a person or a society. Consequently, cultural relativism is based on the belief that a moral standard is correct only when approved by the system of beliefs of a society, or wrong when such beliefs go against those of the society in general. Cultural relativism is similar to the view of ethical subjectivism, which states that a correct moral standard is the one approved by each individual, which means that morality is based on the beliefs of each person. An example of cultural relativism is a Patriarchal society in which women were undermined. In these societies women were not allowed to direct any political, economic, or cultural activities. Their role was mainly to cook and take care of the children. For many of us this is not morally correct since most of us in western societies consider that women should have the same rights as men have. However, according to cultural relativism the ideals of the Patriarchal society wouldn 't be morally wrong since morality is relative to what each society considers it 's guiding ideals, even if that includes the discrimination of women.

Given these facts, the film can be seen as a cautionary tale considering the present-day homogenization of culture. With an increase in social conformity comes a decrease in personal morality. This is shown by the

In addition, culture shapes a person's ethics and what he or she finds important. For example, in “Funny in Farsi”, when a young girl from Iran comes to America and goes to school with her mother on the first day, her teacher ask her mother to find Iran on the map. While reflecting on this incident which caused extreme embarrassment, the girl realizes they during her mother’s childhood “ a girl’s sole purpose was to find a husband (Dumas 12). In Iranian culture, education for girls

I attended the “#MeToo #TimesUp: Where do we go from here?” session, which highlighted the the movement to speak up about sexual harassment and violence. Currently, mostly upper-class white women are getting recognition for speaking up, however, it is crucial to also include and hear the voices of indigenous and colored women and men. Just at CU, there is a higher percentage of LGBTQA+ students and disabled students who have been a victim of sexual assaults than straight students, however in media these stories are often not talked about. The speakers discussed how Native American females stand out because they have some of the highest percentages of sexual assault, yet they are less likely to be assaulted from their own community and more

Cultural relativism is the view that all beliefs are equally valid and that truth itself is relative, depending on the situation, environment, and individual. Those who hold to cultural relativism hold that all religious, ethical, aesthetic, and political beliefs are completely relative to the individual within a cultural identity. Cultural relativism (CR) says that good and bad are relative to culture. What is "good" is what is "socially approved" in a given culture. Our moral principles describe social conventions and must be based on the norms of our society.

Each character expresses this theme in his or own unique, tragic way through interactions with Nazism and the exploration of the Fatherland concept. Central to the message of the movie lies the idea of tribal allegiance versus individual identity. As every character grapples with what it means to be a part of the effort to reestablish the Fatherland, we see a spectrum of positions ranging from outright rejection to fervent adoration of the tribal identity. Each member of the family occupies a different space on the pole, and their position on the spectrum defines their needs and desires within the story.

As an international student, cultural conflicts always exist but the diversification makes me enjoy. In Unites States, I realized different cultures can be combined together and no bias. I am a sophomore student and I’d love to join those activities that can introduce my cultures to other countries people. I am proud of my culture and I’d love to know other countries’ cultures.

Serving as a reference for just how extensive and significant the conflict has become, the film represents the opinions of children upon the matter, some who claim they even want to kill those on the opposite spectrum of the clash. In this way, I feel that it accurately contests the stereotypes most people have upon the subject, as it depicts how even children in all their innocence are being brought up harboring a bitter sense of resentment toward a people they have only ever heard of, but never truly gotten to know. It is clear throughout its entirety that the basis of the conflict is misunderstanding, and its perpetuators the children who learn to hate with a blind passion because they do not know any better. Upon actually hearing them talk so bitterly and seeing them cry, it is apparent just how poignantly and realistically the film captures the conflict as opposed to a monotonous relation of the facts with no background and no basis in which to refer one’s

Cultural relativism means the exact opposite of ethnocentrism. It can be summed up as believing that “all religious, ethical, aesthetic, and political beliefs are completely relative to the individual within a cultural identity” (www.cultural-relativism.com). This means that there is no definite “right” or “wrong”, but rather an ever-changing set of values for each separate culture.

Different societies have different moral codes. Cultural relativism claims that ethics is relative to individuals, groups, cultures and societies. Relativism resists universal moral normal. The moral code of society determines what is right or wrong in that society. There’s no objective standard that can be used to judge one’s society code against another. Its arrogant to judge others cultures. We should always be tolerant of them. Cultural relativism for many people is a response to the complexity of moral issues and the number of different responses various. Groups our cultures have given to moral issues so for many when we look at just how different cultures have responded two different issues the way different cultures. All this diversity that there seems to be a response where we want to say well, maybe there isn 't some sort of absolute right or wrong maybe morality really is just relative to a different group that different people believe different things. In this paper, I will discuss the aspect of my culture from an outside perspective and discuss another culture from an inside perspective. In sociology, the principle is sometimes practiced to avoid cultural bias in research, as well as to avoid judging another culture by the standards of one 's own culture. For this reason, cultural relativism has been considered an attempt to avoid ethnocentrism. Cultural relativism is related to but often distinguished from moral relativism, the view that morality is relative to