Cultured Meat Research Paper

The effects of factory farming is not worth the damage that is done to the health of the environment, animals, and people. The idea of a factory farm is to produce meat at a faster pace, but the way these companies accomplish this task makes life a living hell for the animals. For example, “They’re often given so little space that they can’t even turn around or lie down comfortably. Egg-laying hens are kept in small cages, chickens and pigs are kept in jam-packed sheds, and cows are kept on crowded, filthy feedlots”(Factory). The animals on these farms have to experience constant fear and agony, especially since most factory farmed animals will be genetically manipulated to grow larger or to produce more milk or eggs than they naturally would, and suffer severe pain throughout their entire life(Factory). Animals, especially cows, are being abused not only physically, but mentally as well.. For example, “just within hours of birth, calves are taken away from

The world has a need for meat, and it is almost obsessive. Most cultures typically consume some sort of domesticated animal in agriculture. Whether it is cows, chicken, lamb, deer, turkey, or fish, many people are not educated to the fact that the alternative diets are better for their health. There are different animal products for breakfast, lunch, and dinner. Hundreds if not thousands of diverse chain restaurants dedicated to meat consumption.There are also many different holidays around the world such as Thanksgiving and Christmas where meat is consumed. With affordable prices and an acquired taste, it is likely to be a lifelong habit. There are vast miles of subsidized agricultural land dedicated to the cultivation of animals. According to Amir Khan, staff writer for U.S.News, reporting on the American Meat Institute, Americans consume, “57 pounds more meat than they were in the 1950s”(Khan).

The meat industry today is not what it was nearly a century ago. While improvements are thought to have been made, an ever changing society has brought upon new problems that have been piled on to the previously existing ones. While these problems are not like those found in The Jungle, they do parallel how by exposing what is going on in the meat industry; new regulations would be the answer to the noted problems. The increased demand for meat has made it a rushed mutated production instead of a means to raise livestock for consumers. Taking into consideration the demand for cheap meat that will be used for in quick and high demanded products such as frozen and fast food, this demand of meat has greatly skyrocketed. Animals whose sole

It won’t come as a surprise to anyone that Americans like their meat. In fact, America produced 93 billion pounds of meat and poultry in 2012, which included some 32 million cattle. As many of us already know, agriculture has a significant impact on our environment in a variety of ways. In order to successfully rear livestock, slaughterhouses require large quantities of water, and emit plenty of greenhouse gases – methane and CO2 specially – during production.

Meat is one of the most basic building blocks of human life. We have relied on meat in one way or another virtually since the dawn of time. Humans as a whole have become almost dependent on the constant and readily available supply of meat, in some way or another. Yet, what our over consumption of animal meat has done to the meat market is unacceptable, to say the least. Industrialized meat has left such a stain on the environment, human health, and the overall well-being of the animals we consume. In the article, “Tenderloin’s a Steal, But At What Moral Price?” by John Kessler, the question of whether or not to buy the industrially raised tenderloin or spend a few extra bucks on the sustainably raised tenderloin comes up. To lessen the

Research and studies on synthetic meat reveal that is proper and necessary in order to maintain the supply and demand required for the expanding population. While some might say that it is morally incorrect it is what will save the world from becoming extinct. As of today, in-vitro meat is only an idea for the future. Scientists are beginning to research synthetic meat more because of the rising amount of controversy

Meat, everyone loves meat. Well, except for vegetarians. I for one am a meat lover; if you asked me to choose between a healthy salad and an oily heart attack burger, I would go for the burger. I eat fast food once in a while, and I do like the burgers. At times, I would wonder where the meat comes from since it tastes different from burgers that come from actual restaurants. Many people other than me eat fast food daily and have become a habit for them. In addition, due to the rise in costumers, fast food industries opened many more restaurants, which led to a higher demand of meat. Due to this high demand for meat, meat industries are starting to use various ways to produce meat quickly. However, speeding up the processes can cause meat

When it comes to the matter of factory farming there is only one word that accurately describes the practice: unethical. The practice whether or not one eats factory farmed meats has come to impact every citizen of the planet do to a myriad of factors. The practice is ultimately unsustainable do to its environmental impacts. The livestock that factory farms raise are exploited and stripped of their fundamental rights. The antibiotics that are forced into the livestock to sustain their living conditions is going to change the way we as humans deal with currently curable illnesses.

Million of pounds of meat are consumed by Americans each year. Yet not a lot of people give a thought about where this meat actually comes from. In contrast to time before industrialize farm and big grocery stores; everyone knew their produce came from a local farm. Industrialize farming is a big industry that affect a wide range of aspects in today’s world. The big three aspects that are affected by Industrialize farm are health, economic, and environmental. Industrialize meat farm is a necessary institution, but we must implement changes and reforms to ensure the produce is safe and ethical.

Stem cell meat is also opening doors for vegetarians and giving hope to animal right activists. Animal right activist group PETA started this scientific wave of ideas of creating meat when in 2008, they announced a prize of US$1 million to anyone who could create a stem-cell version of chicken meat. 70 billion farm animals are only brought up to be slaughtered for our consumption each year, and they receive horrible treatment for their whole lifetime, from infections, limbs being cut off while conious, being only feed hormones and antibiotics that prevent disease and maximise their growth and food production. If stem cell meat gains popularity these factory farms will close down, and the animal right activists will have accomplished their

The cattle industry produces vast amounts of strain in the environment. It is energy inefficient, pollutes water, occupies many acres of land, and deteriorates the health of the people who abuse its consumption. The government subsidizes this industry. Therefore, the price paid for meat doesn’t reflect the environmental hazards involved in the process. In order to protect our health and the health of the environment we should pay close attention to our food choices and make sure we don’t support industries that degrade it.

As the human population continues to grow exponentially, researchers like David Jenkins, are looking into other possible food production. Jenkins proposes that eating plants would not only be beneficial for the body, since it lowers cholesterol and blood pressure, but it would also be more sustainable than raising meat. Jenkins’ research highlights three dietary methods and he explains how these dietary methods (especially Simian) can help us feed 9 billion in 2050. With the exponential growth in human population, there must be an increase in livestock (meat) to support the rapid growth. Jenkins’ data show that already livestock feed processing and production heavily contributes in the emission of greenhouse gases. Jenkins’ proposal is that

Global meat production rose to a new peak of 308.5 million tons in 2013, according to the UN Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), a more than fourfold increase over the last five decades. Even more startlingly, meat production has grown 25-fold since 1800 (Horrigan, Lawerence &Walker, 2002). Globally, agriculture utilizes nearly 70 per cent of the world 's available freshwater. One-third of that percentage is used to grow grains to feed to livestock (ECOS, 2014). While the global meat industry provides food and a livelihood for billions of people, it also has significant environmental and health consequences for the planet. Over half of the water used in meat production

Consumption of meat by humans creates several problems. First and foremost, raising animals for food compromises the environment. For example, it takes a large amount of natural resources to sustain the meat industry. The use of water, land, and food to raise animals for human consumption is not an efficient use of our limited resources. In contrast, it is more efficient to feed humans directly than to use land, food, and water to feed animals to be used as food. There are shortages of fertile land, clean water, and food in several third world countries. Many of these countries’ resources are allocated to produce feed for animals in developed countries around the world. As a result, the citizens of these countries are stricken with water and food shortages, while their crops are feeding cattle from across the globe. However, this problem can be solved by adopting a vegan diet. The vegan diet will allow a more efficient use of resources that in turn can be used to feed starving men, women, and children throughout the world. Consequently, more people in the world could be fed if the land used to grow feed for animals was used to grow food for humans.

Yesterday I was checking the news feed in my Facebook and suddenly stopped at the tragedy picture, the image which poor pigs were heading to a slaughterhouse. Many comments claimed that it would be great if we can consume meat without slaughtering those animals. Now, this imagination is on the way. In 1932, Sir Winston Churchill, the orator and the former prime minister of the United Kingdom, once envisioned that in 50 years from now on we would be growing edible animal parts with a suitable method to “escape the absurdity of growing a whole chicken”. During that time, populace thought that his vision is such an airy-fairy perspective until now. Notwithstanding Churchill’s prediction is 30 years late, but on 6th August 2013, it was upon us. On that day, the first fresh cooked lab-grown beef burger was served by Professor Mark Post of Maastricht University. The procedure is that he uses a stem cell from a muscle tissue of the cow and plants it in a petri dish, coupled with trots a growth serum regularly. Till recently, the artificial meat project has grown step by step, but still couldn’t hit it big because apart from a side that supports this idea, the majorities assume that it is not the right solution. According to EU survey of the public, 54% of participants said no to the lab-grown meat while 6% said they would approve. In the meantime, this innovation ranked 21st out of 22 schemes in order of popularity for ‘the future applications of science'. Furthermore, some