Cunningham's Leadership In Command Second World War

As an effective leader one has to be especially close to their subordinates in order to provide them with the necessary purpose, direction and motivation to complete their assigned task. The tactical level is usually found at the company or platoon level, this leader is always looking to accomplish the short term goals in support of the long term mission. Tactical leaders must know how to solve problems quickly and without hesitation, they have more direct influence over soldiers because they are in the trenches with them. At this stage the leader has to council, correct and led their soldiers through the direct approach of leadership.

Independent of the Army and country you serve, leadership is always an important subject. There are many civilian books and military manuals talking about leadership. The United States Army divides the subject leadership in three levels. These levels are Direct Leadership, Organizational Leadership, and Strategic Leadership. In this paper, the focus will be only about the first two levels. According with you rank, you will work more in one of these levels. Because of that, most part of time there is not much interaction between higher-level leaders and lower level leaders. Despite the limited interaction between higher level leaders like Brigade commanders with the lower level leader like company commander it’s not affect a satisfactory mission accomplishment.

The movie “Twelve O’ Clock High” is a case study in the application of leadership theory during World War Two. Gregory Peck portrays Brigadier General Savage, a United States Army Air Force officer thrust into a situation that requires a maximum effort both on the ground and in the air as he attempts to re-invigorate an undisciplined, anxiety ridden, and ineffective combat unit. Throughout the movie we observe Peck’s character employing a variety of leadership methods, but ultimately discovering that true combat effectiveness and cohesion is accomplished through a

This paper on Leadership will compare the primary differences and characteristics between the tactical leader and the organizational leader. I will provide you with the basics for development, characteristics, and the fundamentals that help guide and influence each leader’s style and how they influence Soldiers to follow them. Leaders at all levels demonstrate their values, knowledge, skills, and abilities in many different means and methods in

Being a leader is always a challenge, and assuming a new command is challenging. There are a lot of expectations to me as a leader. The organization has selected me to a new position, and they believe I fulfill their standards for their leaders. The organization trust and expect me to lead, develop and achieve. My superiors and subordinates have a lot of expectations. They expect me to lead them in the best way to solve our assigned missions. In my new assignment as commander of 4th Armor Brigade Combat Team (ABCT), the main critical leadership problems are the lack of cohesive teams, ethical and work standards and the level of stress. I will through analyze explain and defend my selection of critical leadership problems and apply a model for solving them, including implementing and measuring my vision as the new brigade commander.

Successful leadership on a battlefield can be measured in different ways. It is possible for a good, successful leader to lose a battle. Conversely, it is possible for an ineffective leader to win a battle, given the right circumstances. What distinguishes a successful leader from an unsuccessful one is his/her ability to oversee an operation using effective mission command. In ADP 6-0, mission command as a philosophy is defined as “as the exercise of authority and direction by the commander using mission orders to enable disciplined initiative within the commander’s intent to empower agile and adaptive leaders in the conduct of unified land operations” (ADP, 1).

General Gates further showed leadership by providing purpose and direction to subordinate commanders. To reestablish good order and discipline, General Gates ordered that commanders conduct daily drills designed to instill confidence in the men and themselves.9 With this renewed confidence, General Gates' subordinate commanders had not the least doubt of beating or compelling the British to retreat.10 Leadership, is a commanders activity. In mission command, leadership influences all of the commander's activities.11 It is how commanders show concern for their Soldiers and provide direction to their subordinate commanders. General Gates exhibition of leadership from preparation to execution enabled his Soldiers and subordinate commanders

Of all the leaders to research, whom I have discovered to be the most fitting for this assignment and inspirational in leadership style, comes out of the second section of the book WAR titled Killing by Sebastian Junger. This section of the book focuses a lot on the Commander of Battle Company Captain Dan Kearney and his leadership attributes as the Company Commander. It is actually in the first section of the book Fear did I first appreciate this Commander and why Junger makes mention of his battlefield decisions throughout the book. Although the book does a great job at portraying Kearney’s attributes, it is in the movie Restrepo where I was able to best appreciate his leadership attributes through the live

Maj. Gen. “Fighting Joe” Hooker demonstrated an excellent example of failed mission command during the Battle of Chancellorsville in April 1863. He had thought he would defeat General Robert E. Lee’s Army of Northern Virginia by maneuver beginning in Chancellorsville as he pushed Lee toward Richmond. His commitment toward his own plan for Lee’s response would overshadow his operational planning and ultimately lead to a mission command failure at Chancellorsville despite outnumbering Lee’s troops 128,000 to 60,000. Through decentralized execution, Hooker could have empowered agile and adaptive leadership to operate under uncertainty, exploit opportunities, and achieve unity of effort. Instead, he failed in exercising at least four principles of mission command. He did not provide a clear commander’s intent, create shared understanding, exercise disciplined initiative, or accept prudent risk.

In 1914 the First World War, or the Great War, broke out in Europe. It

Leadership is one of the most important aspects of life in the Canadian military. The Profession of arms requires a style of leadership that meets the needs of it diverse membership. The requirement of human resources and ability to effectively manage its assets and defined as “a process whereby an individual influences a group of individuals to achieve a common goal” which contributes to the efficiency of getting things done.

There is one of the finest military leaders the United States ever produced in the history, General MacArthur, was born in Little Rock, Arkansas. His dad, Arthur MacArthur, was a war hero and a Lieutenant General in the Army during the Civil War. After graduating from the West Point Military Academy in 1903, Gen. MacArthur served in the Army and was promoted to the General (Four stars) of the Army in 1930, moreover, he was promoted to five-star general during WWII. He was committed to preserving the military strength that had been weakened by the Great Depression. In 1936, he worked as an advisor to the Philippine army and retired from his active duty the following year.

Everyone should be treated fairly. When leaders treat everyone fairly it can build a strong morale, better relationships between the leader and direct report and then trust will be established.

Leadership, entrepreneurship, and strategy are three fields which are critical for good management (flatwood, nd). To illustrate this point I’m going to detail an example of each and how they are both similar and different. An example of good leadership are the actions of United States Army officer General George S. Patton. In World War II, he successfully defeated Nazi Germany on many battle fronts (Leadership.2016).

The framework to have a successful operation in the maritime environment security forces is being able to properly supervisor and mentor personnel on their duties and responsibilities. Being able to be an effective supervisor can make or break an organization. Many of us in the military have had both bad and good supervisor. To be a good supervisor in any organization you must be able to pass information down from the top to your subordinates in an effective matter. You must be able to get them to buy into the overall organizational goals. If not, you may have trouble getting assigned task complete effectively or even not at all. Being a leader is a rough task and not all people are able to be an effectively leader. As seen