Current Payment Model Ffs Payment

Healthcare is often driven by consumers and insurance companies; there is strong pushes for insurance companies to start paying better through Patient Care Medical Homes (PCMH) or Accountable Care Organizations (ACO) rather than paying at a per-visit basis (Hamlin, 2015). With PCMH or ACOs payment is made on a continuum of care, encouraging the provider to be involved in all aspects affecting health of the patient (Derksen, & Whelan,

An ACO are groups of healthcare providers who work together to provide cost efficient care for Medicare patients. Nurses will help an ACO by functioning as a care coordinator of Quality Improvement Manager. Care coordinators will have to manage care with doctor offices, hospitals, rehab centers, and home settings, Quality Improvement Managers will focus on analyzing data and promoting evidence based practices.

The Accountable Care Organization (ACO) are groups of doctors, hospitals, and other health care providers, who come together voluntarily to give coordinated high-quality care to their Medicare patients (McCarty, B., 2016). For example, Medicare Shared Savings Program was created by The Center for Medicare & Medicaid Services to monitor and establish that all ACO’s are meeting the quality performance benchmarks and reduce Medicare spending by certain percentages (H., 2017). The growth of ACO’s from 2011 to 2016 is astonishing, in 2011 there was 64 ACO’s and by 2016 they have risen to 838 in the U.S. (H., 2017).

The Rural Accountable Care Organizations Improvement Act of 2015, introduced to the United States Senate in May and now being reviewed by the Senate Finance Committee, will amend part of the Social Security Act to try and improve the way the Medicare shared savings program assigns beneficiaries by basing the assignments on services of primary care offered by providers, including Nurse Practitioners (Govtrack.us, 2015). For Nurse Practitioners specifically, this new legislation will allow nurse practitioner patients to be assigned to Medicare shared savings Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs) (AANP, 2015).

Advance Payment Account Care Organization Model which focuses additional support to physician owned and rural providers participating in the Medicare Shared Savings Program by providing start-up resources to build better infrastructures throughout. The shared savings which the Accountable Care Organization (ACO) would be split in half and given back to the organization which provided the savings. In other words, in the case of my hometown hospital, if an ACO would take over and re-open our hospital, the predictions are that by retrieving these savings which are provided for by Obama-care, and by right-sizing our hospital from a 45 bed hospital to a 10 bed hospital and right-sizing the amount of employees, we would be back in the black within a 2 year period. That is a major step in financing this hospital to continue servicing a major part of the community which needs major health care to continue.

The Medicare Shared Savings Program was established by section 3022 of the Affordable Care Act and aims to improve beneficiary outcomes and increase the value of care by providing better care for individuals, better health for populations, and lowering growth in expenditures (Lieberman, & Bertko, 2011). The Affordable Care Act created ACOs, which is part of Medicare since January 2012, together with a Shared Savings Program it has the potential to lower costs, improve the quality of care, facilitate delivery system reform, and promote innovation in health care ( Lieberman, & Bertko, 2011).

One of these examples is the Meridian Health Accountable Care Organization. “In January 2013, Meridian was selected by the Centers for Medicare &Medicaid Services (CMS) to participate as a Medicare Accountable Care Organization (Meridianhealth.com). When a system is selected to become an Accountable Care Organization it can choose one of three routes. They are Medicare Shared Savings Program, Advanced Payment ACO Model, and Pioneer ACO Model. Meridian Health chose the shared savings program. This program goals include better care for individuals, better health for populations and lowering growth in expenditures. The Shared savings program also rewards “ACOs that lower growth in health care costs while meeting performance standards on quality of care and putting patients first” (CMS.gov). The next type of ACO is the Advanced Payment Model. This model is “designed for physician-based and rural providers who have come together voluntarily to give coordinated high quality care to the Medicare patient they serve… selected participants will receive upfront monthly payments”(CMS.gov). This form of ACO is for systems that do not meet the requirements for Shared Savings because they are too small in size and they do not have access to capital so that they can invest in upgrading their system. So far there are 35 ACO using this model and so that they can

The viewpoint of their proponents, there is a difference from historical managed care arrangements in ACOs predominantly HMOs since they are centered around providers ahead of insurers and usually are not detained at complete monetary peril for the price of health care. In an ideal world, ACO payment approaches will include improvements in quality of care measurement that take into account the range of service delivery ACOs are designed to provide. If legislated, nationally health reform could most likely include more or less research with ACO incentives. On November 7th , 2009 the United States House of Representatives passed, the Affordable Healthcare for America Act (H.R. 3962) which called for pilot payment incentive that would encourage ACOs in both Medicaid and Medicare, along with other policies on payments alterations and authorized demonstrations and pilots (Huntington, Covington, Center, Covington, and Manchikanti,

The accountable care organization I researched is called the Physician Organization of Michigan ACO (POM ACO). The POM ACO is a joint venture of the U-M Health System and physician groups around the state, with the aim of improving care for 81,000 Michiganders enrolled in traditional Medicare and slowing the growth of health care costs, according to the announcement by the U-M Health System (Daly, 2013). The group was launched on January 1, 2013 under the Medicare Shared Savings Program. 12 physician organizations from around Michigan came together to take part in a Medicare-sponsored program that strives to improve on the quality of care for traditional Medicare recipients, while also containing cost growth. In 2014, POM ACO expanded to include all the University of Michigan faculty physicians and thousands of other providers from the University of Michigan Health System. The POM ACO is now one of the largest accountable care organizations nationwide. More than 5,700 physicians and other providers are now involved in the POM ACO. Therefore, the POM ACO is organized as a physician-hospital organization. Hence, the patient has more flexibility in where and how their care is delivered. The patient can still use any doctor or hospital that accepts Medicare at any time.

Accountable care organizations are growing. Accountable Care or Coordinated Care is putting consumers at the front at our evolving healthcare industry. Accountable Care Organizations (ACO) strive to improve outcomes and reduce costs with improved patient care coordination (Robinson, J. C., Schaffer, L. D. 2015). Coordinated Care is defined as the Right care, at the right time, with no duplication, and to prevent errors. The Affordable Care Act encourages health care organizations to improve quality of care and reduce spending. In 2013, there were 320 ACO’s and as of 2014 there are now 700. 2/3 of the population now live in an area that services ACO’s. One out of three hospitals have ACO plans (Perficient Inc. 2015).

Given huge potentials and resources, the healthcare system in the United States stands among the best in the world; however, it has been constantly plagued with issues of cost, access, quality and distribution.1 The national health expenditure levels on per capita basis as well as the percentage of GDP has for several years remained higher than other OECD countries but has in contrast, been ranked low on significant health indicators.1,2 As part of the ongoing healthcare reform efforts, the Affordable Care Act (ACA) was passed in 2010 which led to outright and possible immense changes in healthcare.1 Accountable Care organizations (ACOs) were presented as the healthcare delivery system signature of the ACA, as a novel Medicare payment model.3

There are three core principles to any ACOs. First, provider-led organizations with primary maintenance and a strong base are liable communally and total per capita costs for quality with full continuum for the population of care for patients. Second, excellent improvements will have linked to also have complete costs reduced, and third, progressively and reliable sophisticated measurement performance to improve, support, and provide the savings of confidence are achieved with improvements of care, , McClellan M, McKethan AN, Lewis JL, Roski J, Fisher ES (2010).

The medicare ACO strategy is based on the concept of reducing the medicare expenditure by moving from a provider fee for service model to a cost controlled model based on a defined network of doctors and hospitals that shares financial and medical responsibility for providing coordinated care to patients at a reduced or fixed price.

The American health care system has been victim to an escalation in the prices of health care services juxtaposed with inefficiency in delivery of care services. There has even been cases where State spending on the actual health care increased dramatically in the United States and one of the key components of curbing this problem which has been prevalent over the mass media and has been a major discussion among physicians is the advent of Accountable Care Organizations. Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs) is structured with the goal of trying to improve health care delivery and aid in the reduction of the overall cost of services (Weissert & Weissert, 2012). If there is insufficient coordination of high quality care delivery in the health care industry, this will have a negative impact on patient safety and diminish affordable care for patients. Hence, the development of ACOs is envisioned to be the savior of medical practices and can improve the overall fabric of the American society (Bresnick, 2013). ACOs serves as one of the answers for curbing the problem of high costs, low quality care and possible segmented delivery and as much as it serve as the major determinant for improvement in patient satisfaction, there are minor

ACOs differ from early HMOs in several respects. In Medicare ACOs patients can go to providers outside of their networks, there are no “gate keeper” rules. This is an important distinction that may help with patient acceptance of ACOs. Another difference that improves the experience