Curriculum Development: Process

Part: 1 Explanation and discussion of the curriculum design and development process currently used in Australian Secondary schools.

1- A committee of parents, students and teachers should be able to develop curriculum programs for the school. Teachers can collect information on current effective practices in their schools; they can provide demonstration lessons to the public and their colleagues. Parents can share their expertise and experiences; they can serve as cooperative advisors, editors and advocates for their children. Students can also be a part of it because it helps define acceptable levels of expectations and identify motivating practices.

This goal starts by providing a safe and comfortable environment. This occurs when every student feels physically and emotionally safe. Enthusiasm and respect for the students is also integral to fostering an enjoyable environment. To further develop respect and provide a fun environment I will be open with all students and encourage them to challenge me in ways where there is the opportunity to learn from each other. I believe that including the students in curriculum selection is the best way to provide enjoyment. This will help students feel much more involved in the curriculum, rather than feeling force to participate in activities where students find no personal meaning. I will allow students to help shape the course of study, where they can select some of what they are learning, without neglecting their overall development in physical

Curriculum, as stated by Glickman (2014) “is the what of instruction”. Additionally, Ornstein and Hunkins, (as cited by Glickman, Gordon and Ross-Gordon, 2014) have listed the elements of the curriculum and they “are sequence and continuity, scope and balance”. The mastery with which a teacher can incorporate the elements of the curriculum in instruction is categorized by levels. The levels of teacher involvement in curriculum implementation are described and exemplfied

For this program outcome I chose my curriculum analysis paper from CUR 512, Curriculum Analysis and Planning. In this course we defined curriculum, the aspects that are considered when writing curriculum, the theoretical perspectives found within curriculum, and the goals of the curriculum. By writing this paper, I was able to focus in on a unit that I teach in third grade social studies to get a full picture of the curriculum. I was also able to see the complex issues surrounding the curriculum that I never previously noticed.

This paper will briefly describe the targeted instructional setting that is the foundation for the discussion that follows. Then this paper will present the implications of several theories of cognitive development on the curriculum and instructional strategies used within the targeted instructional setting. These include the cognitive development theories of Jean Piaget and Lev Vygotsky, among others. Based on these theories, two recommended adjustments to the curriculum content for the targeted instructional setting will be presented along with a justification for the recommendations. This is followed by a recommendation of two instructional strategies for the targeted instructional setting and a justification for the recommendation.

When curriculum are designed, planed daily activities follow. Curriculum designed by the interest of the children and go through steps. Include philosophies of education, theories, standards, principles values, research, and views on how children learn best. Usually contained different domains that children develop through the activities. Socio emotional, intellectual. Then, goals and objective are written and say how this goals will be recognize. A plan is coming for outside and inside environment, the activist have to be planned to be out or in the classroom.

The types of learning strategies were focused on teacher-directed, teacher-facilitated, and learner-directed strategies. Both traditional and active learning principles were incorporated in the plan as well. The Traditional learning principle is focused primarily on teaching the student through a lecture or presentation, which is correlated as a teacher-directed strategy. This strategy is focused primarily on teaching the student through a lecture or

Curriculum development simply means the sum of all planned learned experiences which an institution decides for its students. Some authors define curriculum as the total effort of the school to bring about desired outcomes in educational institution and out of college situations (Gaberson, 2015). A curriculum is a comprehensive collection of statements that usually include a mission, vision, and philosophy. Faculty beliefs about teaching, learning, nursing, health, person, diversity, and environment are included (Gaberson, 2015). A conceptual framework organizes the curriculum information.

First, lets define what a curriculum is, Ornstein and Hunkins (2013) define curriculum as being a plan for achieving goals (p.8). The second definition for curriculum is dealing with learner’s experience. According to this definition anything planed outside or inside school is part of the curriculum (Ornstein & Hunkins, 2013, p.8). The third definition of curriculum is less popular than the first two and says, “Curriculum is a system for dealing with people” (p.9). The last two definitions define curriculum as being a field of study with its own functions, research, and theory; and curriculum being defined in terms of subject mater (Ornstein & Hunkins, 2013, p.9). A bester way to remember the definition of curriculum is that it outlines different events to help each educator through out the school year (Ornstein & Hunkins, 2013, p.8). Applied Behavioral Consultant’s Inc. (ABC)

Defining and creating the perfect curriculum has been a struggle for educators and administrators since the creation of universities. This struggle has continued throughout the evolution of the American higher education institutions. Starting with Harvard University in the 17th century and following all the way through to today where there are over 4,000 institutions of higher education in the United States. The goals of universities have stayed relatively the same in that they want to create prepared individuals who go out into the world ready to work and make it a better place. The challenge has been that what the world requires is constantly changing and therefore the knowledge that individuals enter the world with needs

It is argued that there are 4 elements critical to the effectiveness of the instructional process: 1. the learner, 2. the teacher, 3. the home, and 4. the academic programs and the physical facilities at the school. These are interdependent and interactive and must function in unison for effective teaching to take place. The teacher's primary responsibility is to help

Being effective as an educator and instructional leader is important to the overall success and academic achievement of the students that are serviced in an educational system. There are specific resources that are necessary to achieve those academic goals as they relate to curriculum and instruction of our students, with proper planning being one. The key is determining what additional resources can be used and addressing and organizing them in a manner that would assist in their successful integration. The purpose of this paper is to discuss ways that necessary resources to achieve curriculum and instructional goals can be identified, organized, and implemented.

Everyday, teachers are faced with the challenge of teaching students new information that is valuable to their future. Teachers are responsible to determine what and how information is taught. How this information is taught to students is pertinent to their success; therefore, teachers must be able to use effective teaching methods in the classroom. Students have diverse learning styles; therefore, teachers need to determine how students learn best and pattern their teaching to accommodate these differences. During elementary school, children learn to read and write, acquire a basic understanding of content areas, and develop dispositions toward

Prospective student teachers were required to choose a curriculum document from either the primary or secondary school sector for evaluation. They were required to conduct such an evaluation using the Daniel Stufflebeam’s CIPP (Context, Input, Process and Product) Model. The CIPP Model would be used to determine the usefulness of the curriculum in meeting the needs of the Trinidad and Tobago society. Based on possible weaknesses found in the document, prospective teachers were to offer appropriate alternatives to improve the document’s content and implementation.