Currie Road Construction Case Analysis Essay

Peter Bremner, general manager for Northern Drilling Inc. (Northern) was looking over the RFP for an upcoming exploration contract for one of Canada’s largest mining companies, Mond Nickel Company (Mond). The RFP consisted of 2 projects, a Deep/Complex job (3,000m holes) and an Intermediate/Routine job (1,800m holes). The proposal was due in 3 weeks and Peter had to make a decision whether to send a proposal on either Deep or Intermediate jobs, both jobs, or whether to bid at all.

Canada is on the edge of a substantial change that will change the way companies

PURPOSE. This document provides historical information regarding the Davis-Bacon Act and present day implications of the Act. Davis-Bacon, established in 1931, sets a wage requirement for all construction contracts over $2,000 that are either partially or fully supported with government funds. While the Act has been controversial for many years, efforts to repeal the Act completely or to increase the dollar-value threshold have failed. Some argue that the Act increases cost to Government construction contracts and may reduce competition or eliminate it completely for small businesses (CBO, 1983). Regardless, under FAR 22.404, we are responsible for ensuring that the requirements of the Davis-Bacon Act are enforced and incorporated into our solicitations and contracts.

The main competitive advantage that the organization has had relates to the sense of pride of its’ Canadian Roots as well as previous success in relation to the speed of strategic decisions in the past.  To begin to address the situation faced by this organization, it is impertinent that all of the mandatory government legislations are updated and in full effect.  It would also be worth doing research on similar industries and competitors to see how they have made their compensation strategies successful as well as any best practices that we might want to consider benchmarking.  This should be an eye opener to the organization to insure the appropriate changes are made to put them at a more competitive advantage.

Firstly, to select a general contractor the city of Edmonton sent out a tender to six pre-qualified companies as an invitation to bid. The Pre-Qualified bidders according to the Canadian public tender service MERX (2016) were: Acciona / Pacer Joint Venture, Ferovial Agroman Canada, Inc / Surespan Construction Ltd., Flatiron Constructors Canada Limited, Graham Infrastructure LP, Kiewit Management Co., and PCL Construction Management Inc. After an extensive bidding process, the city of Edmonton chose Acciona Pacer Joint Venture (APJV) as the general contractor for the project (CBC, 2016).

After analysis of Mr. Alexander’s proposal, it is obvious why he should take advantage of a real estate investment opportunity. The experience he would gain coupled with the added income would establish a solid foundation for making more investments in the future. To this end, however, I find Alexander’s plan for the Revere Street property falls short. A major deficiency is that his projections are almost entirely predicated on estimates and assumptions that are neither conservative nor reliable. In a similar vein, Alexander’s “DIY” approach is not only exemplar of naiveté, but also suggestive of many implications that were overlooked in his proposal. And, even more discouraging, a best-case scenario analysis reveals that even without

7. Lastly, Anne could cut down on the number of performances to reduce the expenses (if the contract allows for that). From a leadership perspective, the main weaknesses are a vacant CEO position, which makes coverage for the responsibilities of that position difficult, especially in a time of a merger. Secondly, key members such as Keith Lockhart and Ms. Abravanel are skeptical

Political environment of Canada and US jurisdictions create a regulatory profile that prohibits growth which impacts the return on the investment in major projects/strategy either through cost or lack of infrastructure (supply and

CEO did not have an easy initiation as he tried to deal with the resulting economic downturn, the

industry is large enough for many sellers. CMI’s foray into this industry is new, however; in order to develop clientele, CMI should cultivate several segments (namely, the large engineering contractors, consulting engineers, and independent contractors), in addition to a media blitz

At the beginning he was told to report to Jenkins, however, once he got to the site he was assigned to Jeff Hardy.  After the company reorganization, he found himself wondering whether he should report to Knight or Hardy. However, despite the confusion, he never brought up this question to Hardy, Jenkins or Knight. He perhaps then fell into the trap of a “boss­subordinate relationship” and went with the structure he felt was assigned without truly understanding its reasoning. ii. He didn’t take enough time to understand HQ’s perspective on various issues a. Replacing the chief engineer, rejecting frequency reuse patterns, or failing to get sign off on agreements for GMCT cell sites indicate failures in managing upward management relationships. Problem #2: Employee Dynamics Strengths 1. Peterson was committed to building an empowering environment for employees. i. Peterson called weekly construction meetings, which invited all to report on the company’s weekly progress and issues. Shortcomings 2. He failed to consider alterations in team dynamics when making hiring and salary decisions. i. He hired Trevor at a higher salary rate to the resentment of other employees, causing significant damage to the trust and respect between employee and manager.

David Fletcher is a portfolio manager with many years of experience and success under his belt. He currently is a limited partner managing an Emerging Growth Fund for Jenkins Fletcher Partnership or JFP. The company was small when David started and consisted of a CEO, Paul Jenkins, CFO, 2 financial assistance, 4 research analyses, 1 research assistant and a receptionist. David first started with JFP he hired an Administrative Assistance, Whitney to help organize his calendar, contact companies and take messages, etc. Whitney proved to be capable and eager to learn. Under David’s guidance she received her MBA and

He sent a member of his staff to each of the firms locations on a regular basis to hold office hours, answer questions and provide counseling.

There however are challenges in the industry occasioned by uncertainty on future spending on construction projects by the government. Moreover, the cost of doing business and the ability to increasingly make revenue have created a challenging environment for the construction firms. Therefore stakeholders in the construction industry are concerned with whether the government would increase its spending and whether the public construction projects will be available in the future since less than 10 percent are currently financing their clients.

The construction industry much like other industries is dependant with the distribution of “scarce resources” (Drake,1994). Many of its resources known as the factors or production i.e. labour, capital, land etc. are limited (Gregory-Mankiw, 2008), however, wants and desires within the industry are infinite (Myers, 2013). Kishtainy notes that this creates two problems; at any given time, there will be a fixed number of resource, against numerous wants. Sloman 2003 adds that in an effort to rectify this, he argues that we must make choices, in terms of choices within the construction industry Myers suggested that firms need to considered their investments made, how they construct and for whom they construct for.