Cursive Technology

In the article, “Why We Shouldn’t Write Off Cursive” by Bobby George and June George, talks about cursive. The authors argue how cursive should be taught in school and should be considered more valuable. Right now, 45 states has omitted cursive from the required school curricula. I remember when I studied in a private school at India, we had to learn cursive. It was not an optional, it was a must and we were pretty much was graded on how neat/good you write it. Personally, I think cursive is very neat, elegant, and rich looking and I believe it helps you get a good handwriting too.

In conclusion, cursive does not need to leave it needs to stay. We need it to sigh things for checks or for work. When cursive was used way back in the day people had to learn it or they would not pass. Cursive takes time and takes time from more things to do. It would help them in the long run. Cursive was used to push people to write when they couldn’t do it. And that is way I think cursive should stay in schools today. There for, you should try to learn and keep cursive alive. We are going to need it one day but it might be

Through the years, many people have stated that cursive should not be taught in schools. Reading historical documents, personalization, and brain function involves cursive. Cursive writing definitely has a place in our digital society.

Taught more than thirty decades ago, cursive writing has a famed and legendary past. It was once a vital element of American education but is now becoming an archaic artefact as technology advancement and the requirement of more regulated tests push it out of the education system. Cursive writing should be scrapped out of the education system for there is no need of wasting time and resources to continue teaching a skill that won’t be beneficial to the students in the near future.

Some people believe that it that cursive is a waste of time and should not be taught. Not all people think that cursive is not used and does not need to be used, but some do. Technology is taking the place of cursive handwriting, with typing. Typing is very easy and legible. Some people assume that e-mailing and text is easier than cursive writing. Most people that mix cursive and regular hand writing tend to write faster. Cursive is not used very much and people may be losing a link from their past.

Many others believe that cursive writing should not be taught in school because the technology we have now doesn’t require us to use cursive writing. However, by writing in cursive, it allows students to write faster due to only having to connect the letters together. Students who took notes using cursive learned better, retained information longer, and got the concept of new ideas quicker than students who took computer notes. Studies show that after just 24 hours after a lecture students who take notes on the computer were more likely to forget

First, it takes too much time to learn cursive. It takes over year to learn cursive maybe even more time. Grownups probably forget how to use cursive so they have to learn it again, that’s a lot of time! Some schools even ban cursive writing because it takes too long

As you know, most schools are getting rid of cursive all together, but why? Think about when kids get older and they have to sign something, are they going to sign in neat cursive or just write normal? Furthermore, schools should at least teach cursive for fifteen minutes a day. If kids keep progressing in cursive by only fifteen minutes a day, then the teachers should keep going on with it. Then, if other schools see how well it is working, more and more teachers will want to use it more often. If kids can't read cursive, or write their name in cursive, then teachers should still give them the basic steps. When the students get older they're going to say "Cursive is very nice to have around and I like using it every day." But, other critics argue we have computers and we are moving on with society so we don't need cursive. But sill, teachers should teach cursive at least for fifteen minutes, what do they have to

Technology has completely taken over when it comes to writing and it’s not fair to strip this curriculum out of schools and it’s especially not fair for the parents of young children to have to teach their children at home how to write in the cursive script I think it should at least be offered as an extra curriculum class such as music, band, and sports. I think that cursive writing could really benefit anyone children especially but for some reason the school systems have become so dependent on computer technology that a lot of the testing in schools are even done on a computer I remember doing CSAP testing and you had to make sure you filled in the correct bubble just right. As the author writes cursive is a lost virtue and to get it back is more than likely not going to happen this really makes me wonder what other skills schools no longer teach children I mean I know as parents it’s our job to prepare our children for the future but if it comes down to the point to where were having to teach our children the necessities to get them through life at home then what exactly is the point of public schools if they aren’t preparing our children for the future. To me cursive is like math people use it every day and if children aren’t being taught how to write it they definitely aren’t going to be able to

Many students believe that cursive is extremely hard, but it takes time and practice. If you have to sign in cursive then why not learn it. In fact, Cursive isn’t only a way to write, but is a way of art. Many really important things are written in cursive. Though, cursive is hard to write it is better than print. Print is pretty much a waste of time. In fact, cursive takes a shorter amount of time than print. Print can be messy and you have to lift the pen or pencil to write a letter and word, but in cursive you only have to lift it one word at a

In the 20th century, teaching cursive writing was way more important than it is now less and less kids can’t read letters from their grandparents or other family members but everyone is on their phones and computers to wright these days people video chat all the time and that’s why in my opinion we don’t need cursive.

The article’s, “Is It Time for Cursive to Die?”, written by Lauren Tarshis, and “Why I Keep My Letters”, written by Nina Sankovitch, both agree with different sides when it comes to us humans keeping cursive or not. Despite both articles giving good evidence to support their claim, I have come to the conclusion that the form of writing cursive should be preserved, not forgotten. One reason they cursive should not be forgotten is because of the history that comes from it. For instance, the article states, “Thomas Jefferson penned one of our country’s most famous documents, the Declaration of Independence, in glorious cursive” (Tarshis 19). This piece of evidence shows how some of the most important events in history used cursive, showing how

The article’s, “Is It Time for Cursive to Die?”, written by Lauren Tarshis, and “Why I Keep My Letters”, written by Nina Sankovitch, they both talk about how cursive is starting to be forgotten. In my opinion, there are other things similar to cursive in the way that they would be missed if forgotten. For instance, painting. Painting is an art, history, and so much more. Painting had begun when the caveman first painted on the wall, over 100’s of years ago. It has come all this way to become one of the most rehearsed hobbies of all. Painting is something I can do when I’m bored, it doesn’t take to much effort, and anyone could do it if they wanted. Painting expresses things without using words, people can get out what the truly want without

Will cursive die? Will it disappear in schools and in documents? Brian Palmer is the writer of “Is Cursive Dead.” Lauren Tarshis is the publisher of “ is it time or Cursive to Die?” There are main three factors in these articles they include that both think that this topic is important, but they don't say there is any way to fix it, but they don't just have similarities they have differences. Including that Brian Palmer talks more about cursive's history and Lauren Tarshis elaborates more on the present day 21st century. They have more similarities than differences

Those who believe cursive writing is an overrated tradition, argue that the space it takes in the curriculum can better be used to expose students to new, more helpful material. For instance, Source A claims that the practice of cursive writing in schools is completely replaceable. The article states, “when society adds new skills and new knowledge to the list of things public schools teach, some items have to come off the list to avoid a curriculum that is a mile wide and an inch deep.” As a result, some states have had no problem removing cursive, while others like California are still managing to squeeze it in. Source A also explains that with the technology of today, there may very well be substitutes for a signature such as fingerprint scans. The general