Cursive Writing Should Be Taught In Schools

Frist of all, cursive should stay in schools. Students can master it just by working on any form of writing for

Through the years, many people have stated that cursive should not be taught in schools. Reading historical documents, personalization, and brain function involves cursive. Cursive writing definitely has a place in our digital society.

Taught more than thirty decades ago, cursive writing has a famed and legendary past. It was once a vital element of American education but is now becoming an archaic artefact as technology advancement and the requirement of more regulated tests push it out of the education system. Cursive writing should be scrapped out of the education system for there is no need of wasting time and resources to continue teaching a skill that won’t be beneficial to the students in the near future.

Some people believe that it that cursive is a waste of time and should not be taught. Not all people think that cursive is not used and does not need to be used, but some do. Technology is taking the place of cursive handwriting, with typing. Typing is very easy and legible. Some people assume that e-mailing and text is easier than cursive writing. Most people that mix cursive and regular hand writing tend to write faster. Cursive is not used very much and people may be losing a link from their past.

Did you know cursive takes away core subjects like Math and Reading? Well, it does and that’s bad because that means you could make you less smart. In my opinion, cursive writing should not be taught today. First, it takes too much time. Second, it’s frustrating for parents. Lastly, you can gain a life skill because cursive might be easy for you when you grow up.

As you know, most schools are getting rid of cursive all together, but why? Think about when kids get older and they have to sign something, are they going to sign in neat cursive or just write normal? Furthermore, schools should at least teach cursive for fifteen minutes a day. If kids keep progressing in cursive by only fifteen minutes a day, then the teachers should keep going on with it. Then, if other schools see how well it is working, more and more teachers will want to use it more often. If kids can't read cursive, or write their name in cursive, then teachers should still give them the basic steps. When the students get older they're going to say "Cursive is very nice to have around and I like using it every day." But, other critics argue we have computers and we are moving on with society so we don't need cursive. But sill, teachers should teach cursive at least for fifteen minutes, what do they have to

I believe that we do not need cursive in school these researchers give me a lot of my reasoning’s .Researchers say it’s no wonder that many school leaders don't see cursive as a 20th century skill. Besides, and in my opinion schools are under enormous pressure to help students develop the math and reading skills they need to succeed on tests and in college. Teachers normally make their students type one the computer not in

Cursive wrighting is like reading,working out, and music, the main thing in comon is they stangthen not just your brain but asspects of life. To have it in schools is more benifficial then a science class. Not all people who attend school go on to anything that will relate to that feald of study of science. but everyone will need to have good hand wrighting skills. "Cursive Is A Twenty-First Century Dinosaur" they comment that technology is replacing Cursive wrighting, but in fact we are just neglecting a formitabole resorce, and replacing it with a much lazzyer way of doing

In the article, “Why We Shouldn’t Write Off Cursive” by Bobby George and June George, talks about cursive. The authors argue how cursive should be taught in school and should be considered more valuable. Right now, 45 states has omitted cursive from the required school curricula. I remember when I studied in a private school at India, we had to learn cursive. It was not an optional, it was a must and we were pretty much was graded on how neat/good you write it. Personally, I think cursive is very neat, elegant, and rich looking and I believe it helps you get a good handwriting too.

In the article, Forget cursive: Teach kids how to code, Keith Wagstaff describes how they believe that schools should discard the idea of reimplanting cursive into regular standards, and start teaching children how to code. In my personal opinion, I cannot pick a side. I both agree and disagree with the subject. Writing is in almost every career, however, most of the writing formats are technology. Cursive also makes writing faster, again, however, the variety of writing based jobs are on technology. Another thing is kids interests. Although a wealthy job, not every kid is going to want to code. A topic I agree upon is the insert, “The architects of the standards certainly weighed the inclusion of cursive and believed there was no need to include

In both of these articles the authors discuss and give reason on why cursive writing should be taught in schools, and why cursive writing is obsolete. The author of "Cursive Is a Powerful Brain Tool" believes that cursive is essential for making our brains more stronger and functional. The ways cursive helps, is that by writing things down by hand it helps us process material better and medical brain scans show that it also helps with "fine motor-skill development and stimulates both the right and left parts of the brain". People with brain injuries might lose the ability to read in write, but in some case were still able to read and write in cursive. The author of "Cursive Is a Twenty-First Century Dinosaur", believes that cursive being removed from the classrom isn't a big deal. Saying that a survey back in 2012 at a conference was given to a group of handwriting teacher by a lead researcher. Only 37% of the handwriting teachers wrote in cursive. "If handwriting teachers don't value cursive, then why should anyone"? He/she goes on by saying that cursive is virtually gone, with technology being the

Many others believe that cursive writing should not be taught in school because the technology we have now doesn’t require us to use cursive writing. However, by writing in cursive, it allows students to write faster due to only having to connect the letters together. Students who took notes using cursive learned better, retained information longer, and got the concept of new ideas quicker than students who took computer notes. Studies show that after just 24 hours after a lecture students who take notes on the computer were more likely to forget

In 3rd grade summer school the first thing they showed us was cursive. Did you even know that hand writing is 50% of literacy? Or that it helps us write faster? Which is helpful for when we go to college. If we don’t learn cursive how on earth are we supposed to sign are name? Honestly in my opinion cursive should be taught today. It should be used in everyday life.

When my fourth grade teacher tought our class cursive it was a very stressful ordeal for the class as a whole. We had just bareley learned how to read and wright properly, then they throw us into this cursive twillight zone where we dont know anything again. looking at this, its not hard to believe that cursive is no longer being taught in public schools. And for good reason, the world is moving on to the diamond age of technology where you dont even

Those who believe cursive writing is an overrated tradition, argue that the space it takes in the curriculum can better be used to expose students to new, more helpful material. For instance, Source A claims that the practice of cursive writing in schools is completely replaceable. The article states, “when society adds new skills and new knowledge to the list of things public schools teach, some items have to come off the list to avoid a curriculum that is a mile wide and an inch deep.” As a result, some states have had no problem removing cursive, while others like California are still managing to squeeze it in. Source A also explains that with the technology of today, there may very well be substitutes for a signature such as fingerprint scans. The general