Custody And Torture Research Paper

Solitary Confinement has been used as a punishment, to keep the prisons secure. However, with the changing of opinions from a few decades ago, to present time, more people want less solitary confinement used. With also corrections policies changing over time has also changed the dynamic of how a younger person could be charged and sentenced, compared to an older person who is not a juvenile could be put into solitary confinement. More facts about the use of Solitary Confinement, the policy is up for debate. Starting with do I agree with the New York Times, The Living Death of Solitary Confinement?

Enhanced Interrogation Techniques have their situational uses. One major claim is the lauded Ticking Time Bomb scenario in which the case is laid out in a needs of the many versus the needs of the one format. The premise as given by Bob Brecher is thus, “Suppose there is good reason to think that someone has planted a bomb in a public place. And suppose there is good reason to think that it is going to go off in the next two hours or so, and that it is going to kill and maim dozens of people, maybe hundreds. The question is all too real. Imagine, to bring the example closer to home, that the police or the secret services had known that bombs were shortly to go off somewhere in Bali, Madrid, Lonon or Sharm-el-Sheikh in the attacks of 2004 and 2005. But no one knows where the bomb is – except one person, who is already in custody. Naturally they have no intention of revealing where the bomb is. Maybe they have planted it themselves; maybe not. Either way, they remain silent. Should they be tortured to force them to reveal where the bomb is?”(Torture and the Ticking Bomb 1). In this scenario there is substantial moral justification for torture. Consider this, law enforcement believes that torturing the target will save

According to the course text, the creation of the torture warrant can only be imposed by a judge in cases where there is need for information in order to save lives and if there is probable cause that the criminal has information and is not willing to reveal the information to law enforcement (Siegel, 2015). If I was a government agent as was holding a prisoner that has been arrest for being a suspect terrorist and the bomb was about to go off in two hours, then I would definitely use torture. The reason I would use torture is because despite times calls for despite measure sometimes. In addition, it is normal for law enforcement to put pressure on suspects to get information (Siegel, 2015).Therefore, I would do what I had to do to ensure

Jail in the United States descended from the 12th – century England with reeves and shires which is another word for sheriffs long. Jail is the entrance to the system. Next is Pretrial Detention which may consist of being questioned, finger printed, mug shots and long waits. Once detained for an extended period of time, the detainee may begin to face problems such as mental health, substance dependency, medical needs, and legal problems. After being detained for an extended length of time exerts pressure on the detainee to waive their rights and plead guilty. There are alternatives aside from remaining in jail such as, post the full amount to the courts, pay a set fee to a bondsman or release on

Torture has long been a controversial issue in the battle against terrorism. Especially, the catastrophic incident of September 11, 2001 has once again brought the issue into debate, and this time with more rage than ever before. Even until today, the debate over should we or should we not use torture interrogation to obtain information from terrorists has never died down. Many questions were brought up: Does the method go against the law of human rights? Does it help prevent more terrorist attacks? Should it be made visible by law? It is undeniable that the use of torture interrogation surely brings up a lot of problems as well as criticism. One of the biggest problems is that if torture is effective at all. There are

Imagine yourself in a cell no bigger than a closet, isolated from the real world. You are in your cell to 22 hours 23 day, day, without any socialization. You can't communicate with your family or friends. Food is served through a small hole on your door, and the food isn’t good. That’s only part of the picture of solitary confinement.

Solitary confinement should not be allowed in juvenile centers. Being in solitary confinement makes kids delusional and it’s diagnosing them with disorders that they have a less chance of even getting. ¨Getting placed in a 80 square feet room no bigger than a king size bed will make you go crazy,¨ says Brian during a Fusion tv interview. ¨You here things that´s not even there, then it´s hard for you to sleep,¨ Brian also said during his interview.

Since the early 1800s, the United States has relied on a method of punishment barely known to any other country, solitary confinement (Cole). Despite this method once being thought of as the breakthrough in the prison system, history has proved differently. Solitary confinement was once used in a short period of time to fix a prisoners behavior, but is now used as a long term method that shows to prove absolutely nothing. Spending 22-24 hours a day in a small room containing practically nothing has proved to fix nothing in a person except further insanity. One cannot rid himself of insanity in a room that causes them to go insane. Solitary confinement is a flawed and unnecessary method of punishment that should be prohibited in the prison

It was in a brainstorming situation that I discovered the topic of discussion I wanted to hear a convincing opposition against. I knew that choosing something more controversial would garner a greater opposition, but at the same time, I wanted to avoid topics that seemed almost too commonplace in assignments like this. With that in mind, I decided to hear out the opposition against my view of the inhumanity of solitary confinement. The person with whom I discussed, who will be referred to as Person X for the purposes of this write-up, believed that in certain situations, solitary confinement was a just punishment. We had this discussion waiting for our Microbiology class to begin. Bringing up random topics of discussion is not something unusual within the scope of my character, and so rather than wait for an opportunity that would not present itself, I simply asked Person X for his/her opinion on solitary confinement as a justified punishment for convicted criminals. To give the discussion some direction and so that I could better understand Person X’s point of view I asked some questions. The two most important I found being: “Why do you feel that it’s okay to punish people like that in some cases but not in others?” and “How long is too long?”. I found these questions particularly helpful in understanding Person X’s position because I noticed that he/she didn’t completely agree with either one side. He/she was intent on making a point based on conditionality. Although I

Does the policy of strip searching impede on the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendment rights of individuals as outlined in the United States Constitution? In Florence v. Board of Chosen Freeholder of County of Burlington et al this question arises when the petitioner was stopped at a traffic stop, and upon a database search it was discovered he had an outstanding warrant for his arrest to due to failure to pay a fine. The petitioner was sent to Burlington County Correctional Facility and Essex County Correctional Facility, both of which he was strip searched upon arrival. Petitioner submits that detainees held for minor offenses should not be subject to humiliating strip searches. Summary Judgement was

The “Torture at Abu Ghraib” was a horrible event that took place around 2004 where prisoners were taken and dehumanized. A total of 3,800 of detainees were in the prison when the dehumanizing was taken place by making men of Islamic culture preform homosexual acts on each other. In addition to this, the guards of the prison would have these people completely nude and chain them to the doors of the cells with others around. When the military guards were prosecuted and brought to trial because of these horrendous acts bestowed on these prisoners most of them said that they were “just following orders”. Which, as bad as it sounds, could pose an explanation for what happened at the Abu Ghraib prison. More into this, a researcher by the name of

However, it’s unlikely that the ticking time bomb scenario has ever, or will ever occur in real life. The most outlandish part of these scenarios is the degree of certainty in which the government bases their moral justification of torture on. They are fully certain that the terrorist they have in custody will launch an attack on civilians and is withholding information needed to save lives. Such certainty is unrealistic.

Who ‘won’ these detention cases and what relationship do these detention cases have with political fear? In order to investigate this question, I have examined articles in a major newspaper to see what was written about the cases and what that may suggest for the era of fear in which these cases took place. The newspapers I will use are the New York Times to consider what reporters were saying about the detainees and their cases in the time leading up to, during, and immediately after their decisions. Some of these cases had long and thought provoking articles attached, while others has simple reports covering the facts of what occurred in each case. The way the mainstream media reported about these decisions offers significant insight into the fear in the times when they

It is illegal for American soldiers, military personnel, and other agents to inflict physical torture upon anyone. As a result, America has turned to psychological torture, where the rules are more hazy and undefined. Unfortunately, psychological torture often will affect the victim in ways that will last much longer than most forms of physical torture. One of these methods of psychological torture is music, and it is used to inflict pain in several different ways. The FBI has previously used “music and other noise in order to disorient members” of the opposing side during sieges in 1993, and also used music “in interrogation, especially in Iraq and Guantanamo Bay” during the War on Terror following 9/11 (Johnson and Cloonan, 151, 2009). Music

To begin, the scenario known as the “ticking bomb” prompted attention to the idea that if a person knew where a bomb was located, and it could kill numerous people, and they chose to be uncooperative by remaining silent, then they should be tortured to reveal information. However, Brecher (Jackson and Sinclair, 2012) states quite clearly, “No, the consequences of torturing the suspect would be even worse than the carnage the bomb would cause,” (p. 160). The reasons for this logical answer is this scenario “presents no more than a set of highly questionable conjectures; moreover, the more likely some of its conditions, the less likely the others,” Brecher comments (Jackson and Sinclair, 2012). (p. 160). Obviously, there are so many assumptions to this situation, such as the people who are interrogating know that the person