preview

Cutting Up Life Analysis

Good Essays

3. Sherwood, Yvonne. “Cutting up Life: Sacrifice as a Device for Clarifying – And Tormenting – Fundamental Distinctions between Human, Animal, and Divine.” In The Bible and Posthumanism. Atlanta: Society of Biblical Literature, 2014. 247-297.

Sherwood looks into the fragile connotation of sacrifice veiled behind the Christian expectation of atonement and salvation for sacrifice. Sacrifice is “to assuage human anxiety about fragile distinctions between the human, the god(s), and the animal (247).” It clarifies and, at the same time, dissolves the distinctions (251). Sacrifice reflects the human life with the fundamental lack of ground (291). She understands that, among the sacrificial objects, humans are logically the most perfect sacrificial objects (269). Sacrifice indicates “an infinity of needs requiring supplements (271),” which corresponds to human nakedness and vulnerability (270). Therefore “the essential of man is sacrificial (270).” In addition, according to Sherwood, in the blood index that Leviticus prescribes, humans are implied as a standard, the proximity to which decides the value of sacrificial object (266). To put …show more content…

She reads in the logic of child sacrifice that “the closer the offered body is to that of the sacrifice, the more incontrovertible the sacrifice becomes as proof of the divine (256).” “Human sacrifice suggests a source so forceful and compelling that it can only be rendered as divine command (257).” Divine being must exist in the sacrificial activities, because it is only the divine being who can draw the line between sacrifice and murder (or unnecessary killing in case of animal sacrifice). She states that “the intense risk of demystification or the withdrawal of the gods” makes human sacrifice “particularly holy and substantial (260).” God exists in sacrifice not for accomplishing atonement or salvation but for generating proper meanings in human’s sacrificial

Get Access