Cyber Bullying Research Paper

There are five stages to help implement a school-wide change. The first is “becoming informed” and this is the stage that centers on research and information gathering. The goal of the principal is to educate him/herself as much as possible so that he/she can better understand the benefits, concerns, and effectiveness of trying a new program in the building. This is also when any testing or screening would need to happen so that the principal can get a clearer picture of the needs within the school based on the current student population. The second stage is “building support” which is just as the name suggests. The goal of the administrator is to build support for the new changes and to have faculty buy-in so that teachers and staff members are motivated to make the change. Furthermore, this is a key time for the administrator to act as a leader and model so that he/she may inspire others to act and make positive choices in regards to the program. The next phase is “creating an action plan” which is usually with a small group of people hand selected by the administration. This group figures out the nuts and bolts of bringing the change into the school by looking at the schools readiness for such a program, funding, and gaining commitment from the staff. Also during this time, the administrator is setting goals, problem-solving, and finding ways to delegate and support those working on the plan. The fourth phase is “implementing the plan” and may seem like a time

In modern society today, freedom of speech has been a main concern to delinquents as to what they say on the web. Although, cyberbullying has turned into a major issue online that has gotten the schools’ attention and turn towards the security of their students. To accomplish nurturing their students’ safety, they have punished pupils for what they say on the Internet that is harmful in account of others. Alternatively, the Constitution believes this goes against the First Amendment and violates the students’ rights. Schools should be authorized to limit students’ online speech to decrease the matter of cyberbullying which has affected us in many ways.

Document A shows that nearly twenty percent of students are cyberbullies, and more than twenty percent of students have been cyberbullied. According to Document B, cyberbullying affects one in ten teachers personally. Cyberbullying affects the privacy, confidence, productivity of teachers and students alike. It is as large a problem as actual bullying, and the quick spreading of everything posted online amplifies the effects of cyberbullying. Schools everywhere concentrate so much of their effort to combat on-campus bullying, they have no excuse to overlook cyberbullying, which affects as many people, and as at least as dangerous as actual

The concept of bullying in the school system has been linked to many homicides and

I plan to use the input and assistance of my principal, administration, and other colleagues to assist me with necessary portions of my action research project. I will develop a written plan of action further in the project, monitor the project reflective, and prepare a research summary research report of the results of my action research project addressing the effectiveness of the implementation of the PBIS program at Otter Creek Middle School. My plans are for my research to be implemented further along with my principal internship after I have completed the course as well.

These kind of surveys reveal the necessity of facing cyberbullying logically and prudently, among young people. Schools have very important role in controlling this issue between students. Some people believe that school should suspend students who have perpetrated cyberbullying, but since this kind of punishments can have serious consequences other options should be considered first before any suspension. In this paper we discuss why the suspension should be considered as the last option. Suspension will only result in hiding the fact of the issue and is not an effective solution, because it will not only harm perpetrator, but also will harm victim by preventing her/him from learning how to deal with issue wisely, and it only shows the lack of an elaborate educational system.

History DBQ Technology is a basic necessity for most people of this period. It has taken a great effect on the children of our age, however with this power they can say just about anything online, however should there be a limit to this power? The first amendment says that there can be no law that limits the freedom of speech, but there are certain limits that are given by the supreme Court. Many are not sure whether it is right to limit their speech, or to let them roam free. In my opinion schools should have the ability to limit their students speech to prevent the cyber bullying that occurs on their campuses, as it happens to many of the student population, creates a toxic environment for the teachers, and considering it is just like bullying, it should not be allowed either.

Living now in the 21 century almost every student has a cell phone, computer, or some sort of access to the internet and technology and because the way we communicate has changed now, the way we bully is changing. Cyberbullying is turning into the new form of harassment as technology increases, and six middle school girls ages 12-13 thought to use this new method of online bullying to create a facebook page verbally assaulting teachers they did not like and they even called the facebook page “‘Attack-a-School Day.’” They even got other kids involved in the abuse. The young teens were charged with misdemeanor but they tried to argue to side of free speech(case 2). One hundred percent the first amendment in the constitution should be followed

Have you ever been cyberbullied? Cyberbullying is a problem which became worse when the internet was introduced. The internet gives us a huge amount of information but some people harras others with it. They can create hate websites, bully them, intimidate them and more. To limits studets online speech should schools be allowed to do this?

– In the month of September, 2017 Rockaway schools especially Copeland middle school takes many steps to make their community a cyber-safe one. They try to prevent cyberbullying by making many events and assemblies for the 4th through 8th graders to notice them about the dangers of cyberbullying.

The Center presented the officials with a made-up scenario in which a student, using the web, threatened to inflict bodily harm on another student. On a scale of one to ten, one meaning no law enforcement role was required and ten requiring a “significant” role, the respondents rated the situation a 9.1. This was the scenario that drew the strongest approval of police intervention (Patchin). Interestingly, one of Rebecca Sedwick’s tormentors told her to die via a Facebook post (Slifer, Fla. Girls). In such a case, the Cyberbullying Research Center instructed law enforcement officials to discuss publicly the consequences of cyberbullying for education and deterrence purposes (Patchin). Obviously, talking things over cannot prevent everything, but it increases awareness in school administrators and parents. The Center also asserted officers should “discipline students for conduct outside of school if it infringes on the rights of other students or causes material disruptions to the school’s learning environment” (Patchin). Ultimately, the Center left interpretations of cyberbullying incidents and the required responses to the officers themselves. In fact, the Center more clearly defines law enforcement’s role in cyberbullying cases in its general statement found on its homepage. The document says officials should

In this newspaper article, the author helps the reader understand and how to treat cyber bullying. The author explains what bullying is and how it is modernized to become cyber bullying. The article informs the reader of main point, in a brief but effective description about recognizing and treating cyber bullying. The author show great statistical research on her topic but not enough the emotional appeal. It provides good use to my research because of the extensive use on how it should be treated.

A review of the district’s policy dictated that all the stakeholders listed above provide input and contribute to the effective or ineffectiveness of the policy. It was no surprise that all the stakeholders indicated that the policy is dated. Although the state code requires the policy be updated every two years, the fast-pace environment of the Internet, the need to provide all students with access, the dominance of social media, and the continually expanding cyber threats and security breaches necessitate a review of the policy every year. The current policy does not address any of these issues. Mrs. Wall and Mrs. Lancaster both stated that the policy is “very thin” and lacks the needed guidance on how to handle students and adults who violate the policy. Mr. Lancaster did note that the district’s Code of Professionalism for employees provided more information on Internet use than the AUP but the COP is not referenced in the policy. Sandro Bianchi indicated

Bullying is a bad thing but the worst of all the types of bullying is cyber bulling, it is a terrible weapon that can destroy someone's life and reputation. Cyber bullying is a part of bullying in which a person torments or harasses other people in a deliberate, repeated, and hostile manner, with technology. It has had a much greater effect on the world more than the traditional way of bullying.

The opportunity to do the group project helped put all of the readings and lectures into perspective regarding group communication. Cyberbullying can be an intense topic, with people having different experiences with it. It is also an extremely complex issue with a lot of gray areas and unknown factors when considering prevention and response. Due to the nature of the topic of cyberbullying, being able to establish a group process as outlined in class readings and lectures as quickly as possible would be beneficial. In order to have tough conversations and to brainstorm efficiently, there must be clear group standards to have the most productive conversation possible. Through knowledge about groups, awareness of the explicit and implicit components of them, and the ability to avoid negative group practices allowed our group to thrive.