Cyberbullying: The First Amendment Of The United States

In the ophelia project fact sheet 60 % of targets said that their online experiences as a target of cyber bullying affected them at school and at home by causing them intense anger. Cyber bullies are very mean and should be prosecuted. Cyber bullies cause mental and physical harm as well as the message the bully is relaying can be viewed by a much bigger audience and the message will forever be in cyberspace. Even though some people believe that prosecuting cyber bullies violates the 1st amendment, individuals should be prosecuted for cyber bullying because cyber bullies are making threats which violates the 1st amendment.

Schools all across the world have been struggling with the issue of online cyberbullying and how to deal with it.There has been many cases blowing up the different courts in America arguing for their right of free speech online even if that entails “cyberbullying”.The question “Should Student’s Online Freedom of Speech be Limited?” has been floating around the school of America.From my point of view I believe it should not be limited because there is no research to prove that bullying online is more dangerous than offline, secondly being able to deal with peers your age saying whatever they please will prepare you for the real world when there aren’t any rules, and lastly if schools do limit online speech they would be violating the freedom

  Did you know that nearly 1 in 3 teens have admitted to being a victim of cyberbullying? That’s an absurdly large number of teens! But what really is cyberbullying anyway? Well, the Cyberbullying Research Center defines it as “willful and repeated harm inflicted through the use of computers, cell phones, and other electronic devices”. Congresswomen Linda Sanchez is currently sponsoring a bill that would make bullying through an electronic means a federal crime and I wholeheartedly support it! Individuals should definitely be prosecuted for statements made on social media.

Cyberbullying is defined as, ¨...bullying that takes place using electronic technology¨ by stopbullying.gov. Recently, schools have been taking actions to punish students for what they do or say online. There have been many debates and trails to figure out whether or not schools should have the power to limit and punish students’ speech online. The Supreme Court ruled that if online speech is disruptive, schools can punish students. School districts should not have the power to limit online speech because online speech does not affect most students and teachers, is not very disruptive, and free speech is a precious right.

The First Amendment has high importance and guarantee coming from our founding fathers. The Constitution promises its citizens that those rights will never be taken away, regardless of what is said. It is too significant to overlook. Cyberbullying also may contain its own positives. Not only would it be seen by powerful and disapproving adults but also influential peers for both the bully and the bullied. It could lead to independent fixing. Although many believe in government consequences, education itself could finish the pressing problem in today’s youth. What, if any, prosecution such as jail led to the termination of the one thing it was meant to stop? So then, why would prosecution for cyberbullying be any

In conclusion, while cyber bullying can create a hostile environment, so can regular bullying. Not only does limiting students' online speech rights out of school violate their first amendment rights, but it simply does not solve the problem, bullying. If we continue to try and censor students' online speech, it won't be long until a new form of bullying is discovered. Instead of trying so hard to end cyber bullying, why not get to the root of the problem and focus on limiting bullying itself. This is why limiting students' online speech will not solve bullying, and will not benefit schools or their

Cyber Bullying is defined by the National Crime Prevention Council as - "when the Internet, cell phones or other devices are used to send or post text or images intended to hurt or embarrass another person" (National Crime Prevention Council).

Sticks and Stones may break your bones but words never hurt, but in reality, words cut deep. Cyberbullying is on the rise and more people are taking their lives due to another person(s) choice of words and actions. Someone has to take a stand against it, cyberbullies should be prosecuted. It has become a bigger issue than face to face bullying. Cyberbullying is permanent and inescapable as technology progresses with time it lasts forever. They way that social media networks are set up its possible for something to go viral within a matter of seconds. Some people argue that prosecution violates the 1st Amendment; others might say it doesn’t cause any bodily harm. The effects that cyberbullying may have on someone physically, mentally, and emotionally should be enough, criminalizing cyberbullying would reduce the number of victims. No one deserves to be trapped.

Source 3: informational article, states “Indeed, the First Amendment id regularly limited legislation in various ways, but this does not make it some sort of nebulous “privilege” such that hurt feelings justify its abridgment. The last time I checked, hurting someone’s feelings-even in real life-never justified criminal prosecution.” People don’t need to be prosecuted if it is over hurt feelings. To prevent the bullying all you need to do is block the person, either their number or social media. If that doesn’t work then tell an adult. The 1st Amendment is what defends the bully not being

Anna Maria Chavez states, “Unless and until our society recognizes cyber-bullying for what it is, the suffering of thousands of silent victims will continue.” Cyber-bullying is crime and should be addressed as so. Oxford English dictionary defines cyber-bullying as follows, the use of informational technology to bully a person by sending or posting texts or images of an intimidating or threatening nature. Oxford dictionary defines a crime as a sin, sinfulness; wrongdoing. It goes on to describe crime against humanity, that definition is: an immoral or destructive act- an unlawful act which causes human suffering or death on a large scale. Oxford describes crime as being a destructive act, and cyber-bullying as being intimidating or threatening,

20% of children ages 11-18 have been victim to cyberbullying! 84% of cyber bullies have admitted to knowing who their target was. We need to put a stop to these cyber bullies and have them prosecuted for their wrong doings. Cyberbullying should be made a crime and cyber bullies prosecuted. Bills are being passed to stop cyberbullying, congress members in D.C support the bills because of the self harm and depression victims are suffering as a result of this bullying.

Cyberbullying was made illegal December 10th, 2010. Most people believe that there shouldn’t be any consequences, for the reasoning of freedom of speech. Freedom of speech is the right to say any opinions without restraint. America is one of the few countries that allow freedom of speech. Some European countries speaking out against leadership will land you in jail or other severe the consequences. Freedom of speech should be enforced to a certain extent. If you are taking advantage of that freedom, then you should suffer serve consequences. Forty - nine , out of fifty states have laws in place about bullying, and 20 specifically mentioned cyberbullying in the legislature. According to iKeepSafe.org, criminal charges can be brought against

Individuals who are cyberbullies should be prosecuted for the statements made on social media. People should be prosecuted for their statements made on social media. Individuals should be prosecuted if the victim has asked them to stop and if it is harming the victim. Individuals should be prosecuted for harmful statements made on social media. People who have to deal with cyberbullying cannot get away from it.

Prosecuting these individuals is crucial to the safety of others. Cyberbullying can physically injure someone. There is a bill that is trying to be passed called the Prevention act. If passed it will make cyberbullying a federal crime. The bill will make sure that “someone

It has always been a question whether or not the internet is free speech or whether it should be regulated. Within the First Amendment of the Constitution there is freedom of speech, but should that freedom of speech be allowed on the internet? For all American’s, the freedom of speech has always been cherished. Individual’s think that when they are online they can say, be or do anything that they want and there will not be any consequences, but that is a problem because that freedom of speech can be extremely hurtful or even dangerous. Individual’s use the internet these days to bully other individual’s because it is easier to do over the internet, that way they can say or do whatever they want. This type of bullying is called