D16-9-111 Harassment Case

We share a collective responsibility to ensure that all Shoppers Drug Mart locations are in full compliance with Canada’s Labour Report Handbook [above] on workplace safety regulations. We also share a responsibility to prevent liability exposure for Shoppers Drug Mart as well as personal accountability

Officers requested to 304 West Chester Street for a disturbance. The caller was an employee with the Water Auth. and the individuals at the residence became disorderly with him and his co-worker.

On 10/28/12 at approximately 1330 hours, Deputy J. Berner and I (Deputy M. Young) was dispatched to 2712 Dwight Road in reference to a domestic disturbance. Upon arrival, I met with, Mrs. Tiffany Howell (complainant).

In your grievance filed at Buckley Unit, you claim you requested an Inmate Wells 187589 be added to your Do Not House With list and COIII Jones refused your request. Your resolution is to have your disciplinary ticket removed from your record and transfer you to Rast Unit.

That on April 03, 2016, on Chocolate City Road, located in the county of Hampton, the defendant, one Toby Smart, did commit the offense of Assault and Battery 1st degree in violation of section 16-03-0600(D)(1) of South Carolina Codes of Law. In that the defendant, one Toby Smart, did get into a verbal altercation with the victim (Morece Hamilton). And that the defendant did pull out a black pistol and pointed at the victim head and made a verbal threat to cause greatly bodily harm. The victim is a witness to prove the same. All of which is against the Law, Peace and Dignity of the State of South

The Judicial system is a large organizational structure, with complex public organizations. There was a government by proxy approach in Kristin`s case. Government shares power with other governments, a mixture of private and public organizations. (Kettl)

This is an add report to Officer Adesina’s #0048 report. For information regarding the original incident see his report.

Discrimination and harassment can come in different forms, some discrimination could be seen as indirect for example a care worker spending an extra ten minutes with client A because they get on with them better than the next client, client B therefore rushing the client B’s session, while this may seem only minor at the time client B isn’t receiving all of the time they are entitled to and a lower standard of care therefore this would be seen as discrimination and could be sent to court. Most acts however are direct and have more meaning behind them this could be presented in many different form verbal and physical is the most common way delivering harassment and it could be of a race, sex, faith or other difference to discriminate on. However

The defendant began to put his hands up and began walk away and still screaming profanities. Approximately 5-10 minutes, seargeant dabreau, advised that they were flagged down by multiple people, who stated that there was a physical altercation involving the defendant outside in the south parking lot area of the business. seargeant dabreau advised, he observed the above defendant with his t-shirt off, pushing and yelling profanities and attempting to fight another white male and females. (see his supplement for further)

On Wednesday 01/04/2017 at about 2227 hours, FHEO Security Officers were dispatched to the Children's Emergency Department (CEC) room #5 for a Signal (42T) Threats/Intimidation Against Employee. Security Supervisor Steven Evans along with Officers Corey Ritchie, and Omar Alonso, responded at 2229 hours and met with Doctor Yaron Ivan and Assistant Nurse Manager Kimberly Brooks. They both stated to us that the father of the Baker Act patient in CEC#5, Kiana Hughes (DOB: 07/04/2002-FIN #86674239), whose name is Finas Hughes, was creating an issue of safety concerning the transport of the patient from here to her assigned Psychiatric Facility. The father felt that because he was a Homeland Security Federal Marshal, that it was his right to be able

The Respondent has moved herein for an order pursuant to CPLR §3211(a)(7) dismissing the Petitioner’s family offense petition and requests that this Court vacate the Temporary Order of Protection issued in conjunction therewith. For the reasons that follow, the Respondent’s motion must be dismissed.

Harassment in the workplace of any type violates the Title VII of the Civil Rights Acts of 1964, the ADEA of 1967 and the ADA OF 1990 because it is form of discrimination (U.S Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, n.d.). These laws protect individuals against discrimination in the workplace and allows them to have a voice and speak up without fear. Harassment constitutes as unwanted conduct, which can sometimes be sexual, based on color, sex, race/ religion, disability, national origin and sexual orientation. According to the U.S Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (n.d), “anti-discrimination laws prohibit against individuals in retaliation for filing a discrimination charge, testifying, or participating in

A case of social media harassment has gone all the way to the supreme court. In 2014 a case of social media harassment Elonis v.United States appeared in front of the supreme court. Defendant Anthony Elonis had threatened not only his wife and children but also two female co-workers. The argument is whether Elonis harassing Facebook post are claimed to be part of his disturbed sense of humor or taken as true threats. If found guilty to these charges Elonis could be charged with five years in prison and $250,000 fine. Social media is a place to share thought and opinions with friends, not a place to harass and threaten innocent

On April 24, 2017, at approximately 1626 hours I responded to 2401 Cobblestone Apt A, in reference to a criminal mischief. Upon my arrival I made contact with Mary Alava Garcia (victim/complainant) who advised me of the following via verbal and a sworn written statement:

Designed to educate credit union professionals on the basics of political campaigns, ways to get involved and the resulting benefits, the ultimate goal of this program is to foster strong relationships with current and/or future elected officials.