DARE Program Sacred Cow Or Fatted Calf

DARE. Drug Abuse Resistance Education. What is it? DARE is a class that teaches students, like me, how to resist and handle different situations. I took this class this year and found it very helpful. We have all been working really hard in these five months in which we have found to have come to an end. This amazing journey we have come along on was fun, and hard. Deputy Kennedy was a really fun teacher in DARE. He made fun jokes and did some funny things. The 3 key things I learned in DARE the harms of drugs and alcohol, good communication skills, and handling stress.

DARE is a program that educates you on the dangers of alcohol, drugs and other things. Some things we discussed in DARE were being stressed, finding help networks, and having good communication.

Why Is the Dare program the one to blame for kids abusing illegal substances? The Dare program is said to do good but the harsh reality it's that dare program does not help prevent drug use rather than doing that it does the opposite. I believe the dare program is unaffected and outdated and is possible danger towards kids. Dare instead of helping it causes more harm. The dare program is ineffective. The good it does is outshine by the bad long term.

Dare talks about reasons to say no to drugs, tobacco, and alcohol. I learned about the dare decision making model define assess respond and evaluate. Officer Morris told about the five W’s of reporting bullying. We read facts about what drugs ;can do to affect the body Dare has taught me reasons to not do drugs, tobacco, and alcohol.

Programs that talk about drug and alcohol prevent such as D.A.R.E is funded by this committee. This committee is also responsible for the educational needed of students in the juvenile justice

However, conditioning fear to deter negative behavior has been proven to do more damage than good. There have been “several studies conducted which have concluded that youth who were exposed to Scared Straight Programs actually had higher rates of recidivism and were more likely to engage in future delinquent behavior than youth who had not participated in these types of programs” (DCJS 2012). While educating parents on the negative effects of the program could help the best solution would be to correct the errors with the programs systems. By making competent, resourceful, and efficient tweaks to the aspects of the program that do not help the minor the program can not only thrive itself but assist those who attend to do the

The biggest problem in the United States outside of schools has begun to inflict harm to those schools and their students. A student who abuses drugs on a day to day basis will not retain as much data as one who abuses them even every other day. No kind of abuse is good abuse, but if one person can cut their usage in half then there is hope for abusers everywhere. Years of research has continually shown that “there is a direct link between teen substance abuse and how well you do in school (Think 1)”. With all of this research being done to help kids, most will never acknowledge it until it is too late. The reform occurring in schools across the country is the incorporation of “NO Drug” rallies. With a soul purpose of directly targeting students that don’t believe in what people say about drug abuse, these rallies have changed the lives of countless

The Drug Abuse Resistance Education program known as D.A.R.E has become a very widespread and popular program throughout the United States. The program appeals to all ethnic, racial, and socioeconomic lines, which is a large part of the reason why the DARE program has grown exponentially. The program’s basic premise was meant to introduce kids to the danger of drugs, before the drugs got to them. The implementation of the DARE program appeared to be what America needed to begin to put a dent in the war on drugs.

Executive Summary America’s most popular anti-drug program D.A.R.E. has created an uproar. The D.A.R.E. program had many issues the main one being its ineffectiveness. How could the most widely used drug prevention program in the United States be deemed ineffective? What went wrong? “The prevention of drug abuse is an especially salient topic for school psychologists and other educational professionals. Schools are the primary setting for providing education and information aimed at the prevention of drug abuse. Previous meta-analyses” (Ennett, et al., 1994; West & O 'Neal, 2004) indicate that one of the nation 's most popular drug prevention programs, the Drug Abuse Resistance Education program (D.A.R.E.), was not effective in reducing illicit drug use among youths. Current evaluations have produced an array of evidence showing the effectiveness of the new D.A.R.E. curriculum. Future studies must be conducted to determine if this new curriculum is effective. This analysis will show how this once prosperous program has proven to be so ineffective the D.A.R.E. program ranges from $1 billion to more than $2 billion annually. Despite questions about whether DARE works, it appears the cost will go up by millions even as the program is retooled. the following analysis would include a meta-analysis on why the program was so ineffective what could have been done.

60% of school districts have cut out the program completely since 2001 according to the article “N.J. School Drug-Abuse Prevention Group in conflict with National DARE Program,” and according to guidestar.org, the Dare program has also dropped over 6 million dollars in total revenues since

Both Project SUCCESS with Prevention Education Series and Teen Intervene work to decrease the possibility of children using and abusing alcohol and other drugs from a young age. However, Project SUCCESS with the Prevention Education Series operates as an eight-session awareness program in conjunction with the long-standing education and mentoring that the children are already exposed to (NREPP Project SUCCESS, 2018). Teen Intervene is a three-session program which works to with counselors to assist children who are at high risk or already involved with drugs and other abusive substances (NREPP Teen Intervene, 2018). These sessions are an hour long and at minimum ten days apart which equates to about a month-long program. While Project SUCCESS does not explicitly state the amount of time each session is or how frequent the sessions follow each other, it appears that students in Project SUCCESS receive more reinforcement of the content being presented than students in Teen Intervene. Also, Project SUCCESS is distinct from Teen Intervene because it has a foundational program which stimulates children to pursue their life-long dreams and desires outside of drug education (Project SUCCESS, 2018). This gives the personnel educating the children rapport which could be beneficial in guiding towards making healthy

D.A.R.E. is “perhaps the most widely acclaimed ‘successful’ intervention of all ineffective delinquency prevention programs” (2003:130). Drug Abuse Resistance Education (D.A.R.E.) is a City of Los Angeles Government substance abuse prevention education program that seeks to prevent the use of controlled drugs, membership in gangs, and violent behavior. Founded in Los Angeles in 1983 as a joint initiative of the-LAPD chief Daryl Gates and the Los Angeles Unified School District as a demand-side drug control strategy of the American War on Drugs. Students who enter the program sign a pledge not to use drugs or join gangs and are informed by local police officers about the government 's beliefs about the dangers of recreational drug use in an interactive in-school curriculum which lasts ten weeks. (www.dare.com, 2005). According Howell, 2003 D.A.R.E. is deterrence and the notion that giving school aged children educational information on the consequence of alcohol and drug use by police officers will deter them from experimenting and using these substances (Howell, 2003).  This popular program spread wide throughout the United States public schools, but the D.A.R.E. program has been put through many evaluations. Critics of the D.A.R.E. program point to the many studies which find no statistically significant short or long term effects on the key outcome variables of substance use among those who do and do not participate in D.A.R.E. (Drulak, 1997; Rosenbaum and Hanson, 1998;

The Office of National Drug Control Policy (ONDCP) was created by the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988 to aid in the declination of illicit drugs within the United States. The ONDCP advises the president on drug-control issues, coordinates drug-control activities and related funding across the Federal government, and produces the National Drug Control Strategy. Within the National Drug Control Strategy, several goals of the ONDCP are projected. Specifically, this strategy illuminates seven core goals. The goals are to prevent drug use in communities; seek early intervention opportunities in health care; integrate treatment for substance use disorder into health care and supporting recovery; break the cycle of drug use, crime, and incarceration; disrupt domestic drug trafficking and production; strengthen international partnerships; and improve information systems to better address drug use and its consequences. The purpose behind these core goals are to aid in the reduction of substance abuse at an individualistic level so that society can deviate away from illicit drugs as a whole. One prevention mechanism the ONDCP employ is knowledge. More finely, the development and distribution of information on youth drug, alcohol, and tobacco use. Examples of such information can occur by supporting substance abuse prevention on college campuses, expanding research on understudied substances, or preparing reports on health risks of youth substance use. This prevention tactic is successful

One program I accept wasn't compelling was the Drug Abuse Resistance Education program, otherwise called DARE. This system is utilized to instruction youngsters and teenagers crosswise over America to stay pill and savagery free. Funding for this system are in the billion dollar go yearly, however would it say it is worth the trouble? Studies from the Sample and Methodological Characteristics of the DARE Evaluations indicate that the system isn't gathering the base rules for adequacy as the U.S. Government thought it might be. "It has been suggested that DARE may have delayed effects on drug use behavior once pupils reach higher grade levels" says Susan Ennett, a teacher in the Department of Health Behavior and Director of the HB Doctoral Program.

Now I’m going to talk about how DARE has impacted my life. I learned a lot in DARE about tobacco and alcohol. The first fact I learned is that mixing alcohol with medication is dangerous. The second fact is almost 50,000 deaths happen because of secondhand smoke.