DCGS-A Mission Analysis

Human Intelligence (HUMINT) can be more affected by redundancy in combat zones when more than one tactical element working in the same area of operation. “reduce redundancy of effort, and take advantage of positive relations that are built by the secondary HUMINT collectors. It is important to note as each secondary HUMINT asset is examined that some have a secondary mission to collect intelligence.” (Wright, David N 2003). These different echelons working in the same area will collect information about cases and report it to the chain of command, it will process to intelligence. In the operational level, when all these reports gathered and summed together, it will create redundancy, and can be work positively to confirm the data and validate the source or the case. In the other hand, it can be represented a wasting of man power and trained collectors all summing their efforts to the same case or source. These situations created due to tracking of tracking system or a structural issue in the organizations. The structural reformation in the intelligence agency or element it will take a long process, from studying, training, funding, set up communication channels, recognize the rule of the new structure in the process of collecting intelligence, and places its proper spot in the intelligence cycle to agile the whole process. Also, to have a better product than before, less redundant,

According to Army ADP 6-0, mission command is the exercise of authority and direction by the commander, using mission orders to enable disciplined initiative within the commander’s intent, to empower agile and adaptive leaders in the conduct of unified land operations (CAPE, 2012). Effective mission command can generally be analyzed according to the six principles outlined in ADRP 6-0. The six principles of mission command are to: build cohesive teams through mutual trust, create shared understanding, provide a clear commander’s intent, exercise disciplined initiative, use mission orders, and accept prudent risk (CAPE, 2012). This paper provides a brief overview of the

2. Summary: ADP 6-0 is broken down into three major sections. These sections are; the guiding principles, the Art of Command, and the Mission Command Warfighting Function. This paper will place emphasis on the guiding principles and the Art of Command portions of the manual as they provide the baseline for conceptual implementation. Additionally, as a Group Support Battalion (GSB), the Mission Command Warfighting Function predominantly lies within the responsibility of line Battalion commanders. Within the GSB, our primary mission is to provide augmentees and unique enablers to commander’s to further enable them to meet mission success.

Casto and Forrestal (2015) state that accurate coding of diagnoses and procedures and healthcare information abstraction are important in determining the appropriate MS-DRG assignment. When invalid codes are submitted on the patient claim form, there are two MS-DRGs that can be assigned, the MS-DRG 998, listed as Principal Diagnosis Invalid as

Major General Burnside’s failure at the Battle of Fredericksburg could initially be attributed to the army not receiving the pontoon bridges in time to cross the river and sustain the army’s momentum. However, MG Burnside’s bigger issue can be linked back to his lack of mission planning. The issue of not receiving the pontoon bridges relates directly to the lack of Intelligence Preparation of the Battlefield (IPB). During IPB, the battlefield environment is defined, battlefield effects are described, the threat is evaluated, and threat courses of action are determined (Headquarters, Department of the Army, 1994). If MG Burnside had taken the time to conduct proper terrain analysis of the Rappahannock River

6. which of the following tasks dervies from a detailed analysis of the higher headquarters order, the enemy situation and coa’s, and the terrain?

DRG determines the payment under Medicare Part A program for acute short-term inpatient hospital services. DRG systems have changed over the years, it is still used for prospective payment for the Medicare program for inpatient hospital services. Also, many states now use various forms for Medicaid programs and commercial insurers. The DRG payment is determined by a combination of key data elements, the hospitals location where the services are performed and demographics. The hospital stay is determined by the patients diagnoses, ICD-10-CM codes, any surgical procedures performed and the age of the patient and discharge status. DRG groupings refers to DRG codes, patient classification model and key elements determines the number of codes. The classifications are labeled using groupings referred to as DRG code and the number of codes

Oversees the design and implementation of the critical mission essential Air Domain Awareness Architecture the DHS relies on to execute its mission.

The analysis provides valuable information on the short- and long-term effects of a disaster. DLIS operations are comprised of a variety of interconnected tasks and process that are focused on providing vital logistical information to the DLA and therefore DOD.

As an aviator, we are constantly thinking PMSEII/METT-TC. We reflect on the local military, enemy forces, and civilian population. Subsequently, we try to capture the type of equipment, ranges of said equipment, quantity, choke points for the ground troops or aviation elements, and the loyalty of the locals to the enemy or friendly forces, just to list a few. We try to answer all of these before and continue to do so during each mission. As a reconnaissance and attack pilot, I must ensure I develop the situation for our ground and air commanders for present and future operations.

On January 23, 201 an interview was conducted with Milton E. Maddox, CPT, SC Operations Officer for United States Military Expeditionary Training Support Division .Captain Maddox’s credentials include over 18 years of military experience with eighteen months of supply chain experience. Captain Maddox is a Communications Officer for Expeditionary Training Support Division. In our interview he prefers to be called Milton. Milton stated that he serves as the primary Operations Officer for Deployable Instrumentation System Europe (DISE) which is responsible for providing home station instrumentation training support and equipment for U.S. and Multinational Soldiers, Sailors, Airmen and Marines training throughout

The US Central Command’s planning for Operation Iraqi Freedom (OIF) was not the all-inclusive plan that joint operations require. Joint operations are no longer limited to major combat operations, but encompass a wide range of actions. Planning for joint operations requires input from many sources to produce a successful campaign plan to meet the desired end state. Operational design provides a concept and a construction framework that underpins a campaign and its execution. (JP GL13). Evaluating the planning process by using the operational design identifies some of CENTCOM’s shortfalls. US military planners’ lack of understanding of the operational environment led to an inadequately defined problem that resulted in a faulty operational approach. CENTCOM’s approach did not have the right assessment to gauge the effectiveness of the plan such as alerting planners when and if the plan needed modification. Current joint planning policy incorporates several of CENTCOM’s shortfalls in an attempt to provide a better planning process for future joint operations.

This paper provides an evaluation of the command and control and integration of joint functions associated with the invasion of Sicily, known as Operation HUSKY. The Allies achieved a positive outcome despite the fact that key leaders demonstrated ineffective command and control capabilities and poor integration. The paper will first evaluate the joint function of command and control, using the three attributes of mission command from joint doctrine: commander’s intent, mutual trust, and understanding. An evaluation of the integration of intelligence and fires joint functions at the Operational level will follow.

The Articles an amazing story about how NASA has been searching for plant life on the land surface and in the oceans. Kate Ramsayer, at NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center, the author of this article, open with "an eye-catching” truthful statement, she states that NASA satellites can see “our living Earth breathe.” Ramsayer pointed out, the satellite has been observing the Northern Hemisphere ecosystems “wake up in the spring, taking in carbon dioxide and exhaling oxygen as they sprout leaves.” Along with other satellites being able to see the “newly green vegetation” grown.

This step analyzes each of the COAs developed in the previous step. "The heart of COA analysis is the war-gaming process . . . ." (Artillerization, n.d., "Step 4: Course of Action Analysis" section, ¶ 1). During this step, staff members come up with possible scenarios that could take place during the execution of the mission. The author's contribution to the war-gaming was what would happen if a piece of C3 equipment or capability were rendered unusable due to either malfunction or enemy action.