DD307 TMA06

This assignment explores the main principles of different methods in social psychology. It will look at the underlying theories or perspectives that organise contemporary social and discursive psychological research

This is a formal research paper and must be eight to ten pages in length.  Imagine that this paper will be used as a reference for individuals who are completely unfamiliar with social psychology principles.  This paper will provide them with an overview of the field, and explain the key principles associated with its practice.

In the experiment they tested the responsiveness of individuals and how they reacted under stress when first, alone, and then second within a crowd. Each time the people that were under pressure and alone reacted in a higher rate than those in the crowds. Researchers have justified people’s non responsiveness within a crowd, with diffusion of responsibility, in which people are less likely to take action within a crowd, because they feel someone else will take responsibility. On March 14 1964, Kitty Genovese was the ultimate test subject for the Bystander Syndrome, having been stabbed twice in public and left to die on her apartment stairs, but the question that remains unanswered, under matters of a life, is the silence of the crowd truly due to diffusion of responsibility? Or lack of interest and

Why the witnesses demonstrated a lack of reaction towards the victim's need for help? In 1968, two Social psychologists Bibb Latané and John Darley came up with a concept called “The Bystander Effect”, which supposed “the presence of diffusion of responsibility” and “social influence”.

My article was Darley’s and Latane’s, “Bystander Intervention in Emergencies: Diffusion of Responsibility.” They conducted this study to figure out how would people react in various group sizes in an emergency situation. As well as which one those individuals in different size groups would go and call for help. The concept of this was taken from the famous case of Kitty Genovese, who was stabbed to death multiple times and finally was killed in her own neighborhood and no one intervened. This is known to be the bystander effect. However, in this research experiment, people were either in groups of 2, 3, or 6 and then they would overhear the person having an epileptic seizure. It was predicted that due to the presence of

Breaching experiments are sociologically based and used by Ethnomethodologists to help gain a better understanding on how people make sense of their world. Typically, Ethnomethodologists do not focus on analyzing a mass-level society, but rather dedicate their research on individual’s reactions in social situations. The purpose of a breaching experiment is for the researcher to be in a controlled social site and intentionally break social norms. It is important to do these experiments because it helps gain an understanding of socially driven rules and structure, and how people react when they are broken. I decided to go up to people and ask them how their day was, wait for them to ask me how I was and stand there without responding.

Over the entirety of this course one psychological phenomenon has resonated with me more so than any other, this being the principle of Bystander Intervention. My personal connection this psychological principle is engraved into my mind and revolves around a gentleman, whom I have never met, attempting to take his own life. Towards the beginning of March of last year I found myself studying at the Davis Centre working on an essay on the computers. Listening to my music, which as usual was nearly on full audible output, when I began to here loud noises and sounds that seem to pierce my headphones. I turn to see a gentleman, who was not long ago sitting beside me on a near by computer, began to scream uncontrollably and repeatedly strike his

The books main objective is to answer the question: can an understanding of human behavior be based on the use of scientific methodology? Augustine Brannigan the author of The Rise and Fall of Social Psychology critically traces experiments and social psychology's attempt to forge a scientific understanding of human behavior. Brannigan explains that after fully studying social psychology's past and present, it has failed to live up to its expectations of new and interesting theories. The critical portrays the widespread discontent felt by social psychologists themselves. Brannigan talks about what has gone wrong and why large expectations of social psychology have not been metHe highlights crucial methodological mistakes in social psychological research. For instance, the use of experiments to illustrate

In 1964 The Bystander Effect came about when two men of the names Bibb Latané, a social psychologist; and John Darley also a social psychologist were impacted by the murder of Kitty Genovese. Kitty had been stabbed to death outside her own apartment, while over 38 people standing nearby had watched the brutal crime being committed. These same people didn’t have the audacity to say anything or even try to stop the murderer. Those 38 people just stood there and watched while an innocent life was taken away. John Darley and Bibb Latané were so fascinated by this tragedy that they decided to create an experiment well known as the Bystander Effect. This experiment is a social psychological wonder that alludes to cases in which people don't offer

The observer impact was first decide in the research facility by John Darely and Bibb Latane in 1968 after they got to be keen on the subject after the homicide Kitty Genovese in 1964. These analysts dispatched a progression of investigations that brought about one of the most grounded and most replicable impacts in social brain science. In a run of the mill analyze, the member is either alone or among a gathering of different members or confederates. A crisis circumstance is organized and scientists measure to what extent it takes the members to intercede, in the event that they mediate. These trials have found that the vicinity of others hinders helping, regularly by a huge edge. For instance, Bibb Latané and Judith Rodin organized a test

This essay aims to explore the reasons as to why society can allow tragic acts to take place in the witness of neighbours, without any form of intervention and also how dramatic instances of crime can tell us about how people live together and the perceptions that creates not only of an individual’s effects on society, but also the community sense. Firstly by explaining the phenomena of the ‘Bystander behaviour’ also known as ‘Bystander Apathy’ and the ‘relational identity’ of the neighbour, showing it is not who we are but what we do. This can be seen in “Bystander effect” (Open University, 2015). Secondly to compare and contrast the two distinctive approaches that explain ‘Bystander behaviour’. One approach being the experimental method

This essay will be looking at two different cases of bystander behaviour and the similarities between them and differences. How they compare and contrast with reasoning behind why individuals or groups react in the manner they do. Using two examples from Jovan Byford (2014) ‘Living together, living apart: the social life of the neighbourhood’, in John Clarke and Kath Woodward, G. (eds) Understanding Social Lives, Part Two, Milton Keynes: The Open University. These examples cover two approaches the first explaining why people do not intervene to help others when in danger and the second using the discourse approach to the same situation. Using various discussion evidence the essay will put together an outline of the two examples and then provide

You can see examples of the bystander effect occurring even in a classroom setting. A common occurrence of this is when the teacher asks if anyone is confused or has any questions regarding the lesson. Psychology professor Melissa Burkley uses her own classroom as an example. She states that, “Let's say that one of my students is confused about the class material I just covered and wants to ask me to clarify. Before raising her hand, she will likely look around to room to see if any of her fellow students seem confused or have their hand up as well. If no one else looks puzzled, she will conclude that she is the only one in the room that didn't get the material” (Burkley). This innocent example poses no dangerous threat, but the same mentality occurs in hazardous situations. Take for instance a situation in which a kid is thrashing around in a crowded pool. Before taking action, an onlooker may look at how other people are responding. If nobody is appearing to treat it as a life-threatening situation, they will be less likely to take action and instead write it off as just the kid messing around or

At the beginning of the course, I was very excited and enthused to learn about social psychology, specifically because of its relevance to our everyday life. After reading the course material in that first week, I was drawn to both the social learning perspective and the sociocultural perspective. So for the final discussion post of this course, I decided to write about the perspective that I align with most and how it has developed over these past eight weeks. After doing a lot of reading and studying, I found that I most aligned with the social learning perspective. The social learning perspective focuses on a system of rewards and punishments; whereas individuals learn appropriate and inappropriate social behaviors through being either rewarded for socially acceptable behavior or punished for socially unacceptable behaviors (Kenrick, Neuberg, & Cialdini, 2015). Early on in one’s childhood, he is taught values, morals, and life lessons that seek to produce a good, law-abiding, compassionate citizen of the world.

he bystander effect is when they used an experiment to see how people would react to