DOI Scenarios

Maricopa County worked with Jorgensen after his first injury they gave him a weight limit and other accommodations to help him with his job. However, after his second injury Jorgensen was in no position by doctor’s order to perform the duties his job required him to do. Maricopa County also helped him by extending his work insurance to help him cover surgeries that were needed, because they did happen during work hours, and extended it 6 months even when he was on sick leave without

RP stated law enforcement received a call from an anonymous caller stated an employee, Shemaiah Messengale grabbed the child Marley's arm which is fractured. Law enforcement contacted the child's mother to verify injuries. It was disclosed the child had suffered 4 fractures to her elbow and wrist. The RP stated law enforcement spoke with owner/licensee of the facility and the employee accused of causing the injury. They reported Marley sustained the injuries accidentally when she fell from slide. The RP stated the child was treated at Children's Hospital Los Angeles (CHLA) by Dr. Lindsey Andras who determined the injuries are consistent with a fall. Law enforcement did not speak with treating doctor to confirm the information. The RP disclosed

Ms. Juanita Machado is a Line Assembly Technician. She was employed with the insured approximately for seven months. Within the seven months, she has been with the company; she had known of the claimant, Mr. Donald Arauz after he had been hired early on last year in 2016 when he was hired to the same position that she currently holds.

On the morning of August 16, 2017, Wilma Waedle came to my office to discuss a past workman’s comp claim. According to her personnel file, the workman’s comp claim that she was referring to was closed in 2015. That released her to full duty as a Qualified Medical Administration/Certified Nursing Assistant. Ms. Waedle stated that her arm from the previous claim was still causing her pain. She also stated that she had the doctor cleared her so she could continue to work but did not get to the real cause of her pain.

Ms. McClellan and the claimant’s two Supervisors’ alleged throughout the claimant’s employment at Armstrong Olives, Inc., there was an incident report dated 8-7-204, when the claimant injured her right hand when she was sorting olives by hand in the Pitting Room at the Olive

Two experienced nurses had been working at the Winkler county hospital for more than 20 years. In 2009, Ann Mitchell and Vicki Galle became whistleblower in the small town of west Texas. The nurses field an anonymous report to Texas Medical Board regarding to retaliation in the hospital. In the letter, the nurse stated the unsafe practices of Dr. Rolando Arafiles. The nurses were concern about the improper treatment to patient provided by Dr. Arafiles. Since. Dr. Arafiles tried to misuse his connections in order to save himself. Upon receiving the notice from the Texas Medical Board, Dr. Arafiles contacted his good friend and patient-Winkler county sheriff. Dr. Arafiles filed a complaint of harassment by the nurses to the sheriff. The sheriff started investigating the complaint and obtained the copy of the TMB report that clearly identifies that Mitchell and Galle had filed a complaint. Then, the sheriff obtained a search of warrant and seized each nurse’s work computer and found the copy of TMB letter. The nurses were charged with the third degree felony for misuse of official information to cause damage to the physician. However, the TMB disputed with District and County Attorney over the charges asserting that there was no misuse of official information in the state-governing agency. The complaint process allows anyone to report a physician for any unsafe, improper or poor practice including nurses. Since TMB is a government agency there was no violation of Health

Due to the incident of 11/20/11, the plaintiff is alleging she sustained significant injuries as result of the insured operator’s failure to properly park the bus. Since the date of loss and over a three year period, the plaintiff had undergone multiple surgeries involving the neck, back, both knees and left foot. The plaintiff has been diagnosis with multiple herniated disc of the cervical spine requiring a discectomy, multiple herniated disc of the lumbar spine resulting in a spinal fusion, right & left medial meniscus and ACL tears requiring surgical intervention and a metatarsal fusion of the left foot. In addition to the aforementioned injuries, the plaintiff has experienced ongoing episodes of depression and incontinence. .

Ms. Yu claimed there were no reports made to her about any other industrial-related injuries or non-work related injuries that the claimant reported to the Insured. She said the Claimant never reported a slip or fall to either the Human Resources Department or her Supervisor, Ms. Larios.

Ms. Yu claimed during her interview that she had no information to give as to the claimant’s evaluation, attendance and her past employment history. Furthermore, she had no information about the claimant’s medical history, injuries at previous employers, or any other work related injuries with this employer.

1. Occupation and working ability of the Claimant, if this has changed, since the injury, previous occupation of the Claimant.

The claimant had 9 physical therapy visits for cervicalgia and low back pain from 01/12/2017 t0 02/01/2017.

Has the employee filed a Workers’ Comp claim for an injury pertaining to his/her workstation?

I refer to the matter , and his plaint brought under Personal Injuries Proceedings Act 2002 against Central Queensland Health Service District for treatment received commencing June 2010 and subsequent.

There is no medical evidence contained in the electronic case folder or the self-insured employers file which would support the establishment of this case. There is no prima facie medical evidence. The claimant suffers from a preexisting condition. The claimant’s fall is idiopathic in nature and was not caused or contributed to in any way by any aspect of her work activities. There is no causal relationship between the claimant’s fall and the injuries sustained and her work activities. The self-insured employer protectively raises Section

This case in consideration concerns an injury in a construction workplace. An employee named John Schmidt was on the job using a machine powered table saw. He ended up injuring his hand as he