In this article, we are pre-dispose to examine and assess the integrity of the Fifth Edition, of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, (DSM-5). Specifically, call into question is the proliferation of diagnoses and the expansion of the criteria that applies to kids for certain disorders. One example presented in the article was the assertion of the escalation of pediatric bipolar diagnosis secondary to ADHD. The article directly links an increase of atypical antipsychotic medication for both adults and kids to the over saturation of diagnoses for certain disorders. As a rise in consumption for antipsychotic and antidepressant prevail, researchers quoted in the article go on to indicate that medication compliance isn’t …show more content…
The apparent disparity of foster kids covered by Medicaid and Medicare being diagnosed with disorders that required atypical antipsychotics, is alarming when compare to kids who are covered by private insurances. This has alerted providers based on the addictive properties that medication for certain disorders bring with medication compliance. Legitimate questions have risen over the usage of the DSM-5 as an effective reference for practice. These issues have generated enough controversy that a significant amount of mental health professionals have sign a petition asking for a revision of the criteria for certain disorders. Although, prominent mental health entities like the American Psychiatric Association (APA) and the National Association of Social Workers (NASW) have not taken a position in the matter, social workers are encouraged to critically analyze the fallacies of DSM-5. The article is not entirely subjective or opposed to using the DSM-5 in practice, but rather urges mental health providers to explore all the research regarding controversies as it relates to all levels of social …show more content…
When this fails to occur, a social worker should intervene with the best interest of the client in mind, and with the best clinical judgment. We should have a natural instinct of thoroughly evaluating our clients in order to ensure the best possible alternatives when medication is not effective. On the micro level of social work and when dealing directly with clients, our ethical and clinical intuition should guide us. When given the choice to explore different resources for clients and when given the ability to employed interventions that are preventive in nature, social workers must strive to be competent in successfully creating awareness and self
DSM-IV TR, which stands for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (4th edition), Text Revision was published by the American Psychiatric Association in 2000 and serves as a guide book for many health professionals to diagnose a patient with a mental disorder. It also helps health professionals to determine what types of treatment could be carried out to help the patient. The latest DSM is widely used, especially in the USA and many European countries.1However, it may not be completely followed by health professionals as they know that there are some weaknesses of the latest version of DSM as well. This essay will discuss the strengths and
In my future social work career, it is imperative to be cognizant of my personal experiences and preconceptions regarding mental illness. As I participant in evaluation and diagnosis of mental illness, I will utilize a blank slate mentality. I will strive to prevent previous clients’ behavior, the individual’s current diagnoses, and personal judgments to cloud my diagnosis or interactions.
When it comes to social work, evidence-based treatment is a very popular form of therapy. The DSM-5 focuses on evidence-based treatment as well with “developing a comprehensive treatment plan that is informed by the individual’s culture and social context” (American Psychiatric Association, 2013, p. 19). I believe that the DSM-5 is an asset to trained social work clinicians to
Top researchers and clinicians from around the world to be members of our DSM-5 Task Force, Work Groups and Study Groups. These are experts in neuroscience, biology, genetics, statistics, epidemiology, social and behavioral sciences, nosology, and public health. These members participate on a strictly voluntary basis and encompass several medical and mental health disciplines including psychiatry, psychology, pediatrics, nursing and social work. (“Who was involved,” para. 6)
The controversy and criticism surrounding the DSM -5 models has raised questions about its credibility and has raised concerns from the public on the reliability and effectiveness. Problems with this classification system is the attempt to promote preventive psychiatry by introducing how
Although we tend to think that drugs are here to comfort and heal people, we must also take into account that behind every drug, we have a drug company that is making millions of dollars off of consumers who by their products. Behind every consumer, we have a doctor that is recommending and prescribing the medication. In “The Medicated Child,” we learn that the researchers who advocate the use of psychiatric medications, receive enormous support from drug companies. Firsthand doctors inform us that theses drug industry funded studies influence their decisions on what drugs to “push” or prescribe. This is a major conflict of interest because the decisions and results of the studies are
The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th edition (DSM-5) has misdiagnose, Neurodevelopmental Disorders, Schizophrenia, depressive disorders and obsessive compulsive disorders just to name a few. The book has been revised and that has put a lot of people in danger. By controlling all of societies behavior in a book that can be edited is not only risky, but society changes and so does our psyche. What one doctor, scientist, pscyhologist can consider normal other in other countries may not. How can one nation be in control based off of one book. They have misdiagnosed healthy people possibly people that suffered from temporary emotional stresses.
Is society beginning to over diagnosed and stereotype learning and behavioral problems in young children? Are physicians also over prescribing medication and compensating for their diagnoses? These are all questions being discusses due to this article. While the DSM-IV is an excellent resource for helping to categorize mental illness, it has begun to set arbitrary lines between normal and abnormal? Labels have begun to limit individual diagnosises, and alterations in mental illness. Winnie the Pooh is just one of many children’s stories being
During the psychopharmacology era not only, a big population of adults started to get diagnosed as mentally ill, but children too. Before this era, our society used to see children as individuals whose mood and emotions are regularly changing. Society’s expectation was that those children were going to behave differently when they grow up until psychiatry started to believe that this type of children suffer from a mental illness. According to Whitaker, Ronald Kessler, a psychiatrist from Harvard Medical School concludes “Depression, mania, and mania-like symptoms are all comparatively common among children and adolescents in the general population” (217). Some psychiatrists believe that psychiatric
The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) is currently the most frequently used way of standardizing and defining psychological disorders. However, the classification systems such as DSM have advantages and disadvantages. The major weakness of DSM is that it judges symptoms superficially and ignores other possible important factors. The major strength of DSM is that it enables categorization of psychological disorders.
One of the characteristics of a good parent is being concerned over their child’s well being and being their advocate in life. Many recognize their shortcomings when it comes to background knowledge about medical related things which is why the seek the authoritative advice of medical proffesionals, however for some do this almost blindly. As our technology advances have continued to develop at extreme rates were are finally having the tools to better analyze different disorders. Now on the fifth version of the DSM some disorders have been separated out as we learn that it was two vague while others have been combined as we increase our understanding. The scary part is how popularized it has all become in the increase of shared information.
The strengths when working with clients on a medical model perspective is that the use of the DSM provides a common language to use in the medical community. The DSM provides reliability and structural guideline to each mental disorder. The structural guidelines in the DSM provide an organized list of criteria and specifiers to help determine the severity of the mental disorder. When diagnosing a client, there are many similar signs and symptoms to each mental disorder; thus, the DSM provides the clinician information about differential diagnosis, prevalence, possible co-morbidity, age of onset, and progressive development of symptoms. Hence, focusing on the medical model and using the DSM can be beneficial to both the client and the clinician providing treatment.
Hi Katlyn! Your position on guideline for social workers was quite interesting, especially your experience. The only interaction I have had are with school and family social workers and my experience was that they are not doctors so, just like teachers they are not supposed to even suggest that a child should be prescribed or take medication, that is the responsibility of the Psychotherapist. (If my recollection from my previous years as a foster parent is correct).
This article, published by CNN, covers a topic that was thrown into the spotlight following the release of the fourth Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, or DSM IV, and has been heavily discussed as the release date of DSM V approaches. The article, which is supported by anti-DSM experts, theorizes that the medical community is over diagnosing patients with mental illnesses at an unprecedented rate. Unfortunately, the experts provide an extensive amount of bias to the article, which is clear by examining the antithesis to their arguments. Three clear examples of bias are the statements of Dr. Carroll, Kelli Montgomery, and the articles overall focus on the DSM. The bias
The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) has a number of features. First of all, every disorder is identified using a name and a numerical code. In addition, the manual provides the criteria for diagnosing each disorder as well as establishes subtypes of a disorder and examples that would illustrate the disorder. The manual goes further by addressing the typical age of onset, culturally related information, gender-related information, prevalence of a disorder, typical clinical course of a disorder, typical predisposing factors of a disorder and genetic family patterns of a disease (Summers, 2009). The DSM-IV is a tool that is used by mental health practitioners and social service workers. As has been demonstrated