Dallas/Fort Worth Metroplex Case Study

Conclusion: These are only a few reasons why Dallas is a great place to live.

Greenville County’s disaster preparedness plans and resources are maintained by the Emergency Operations Center. The Emergency Operations Center “is the physical location where emergency management and support personnel come together during an emergency to coordinate response and recovery efforts and allocate available resources” (“Emergency Preparedness,” 2015). Greenville County Hazards include naturally occurring events such as dam/levee failure, drought, flooding, tornados, tropical storms, and winter storms; as well as hazardous materials (HazMat) events including fixed facility accidents, nuclear accidents, pipeline accidents, and transportation accidents. Hazardous materials events are of particular concern due to the fact that “Greenville County has more than 1,400 miles of state-maintained highways, numerous railroad lines, and many industrial manufacturing plants that use hazardous materials”

The DFW metroplex is very large with highways and freeways interloping all the cities. For a citizen to get where they need to go a lot of travel is needed.A bullet train would be very beneficial to the city of dallas by providing fast and cheap transportation, it will clear up traffic at rush hour, and bring transportation relief to the

The City of Kelsey is in the process of undertaking a sustainability plan for its water system due to the increase of its residents. The efforts of this project rest on the communication and teamwork with addressing issues and concerns from the mayor of Kelsey. The following paper will discuss the concerns that Kelsey’s mayor has with the methods utilized in building effective relationships with teamwork among city employees and with the motives and values with building teamwork. The paper will describe the communication factors that need to be considered that will have leaders and stakeholders in one accord with the implementation of the water plan. The leaders and stakeholder also have to be in agreement with the tax increase to support the project. Additionally, the paper will discuss the positive and adverse effects of how communication gets handled as well as the leadership methods that will motivate stakeholders. Last, the paper will discuss how the mayor may address performance inadequacies and still maintain a productive organizational structure.

As I researched and carefully observed our four stores, the Dallas Expenses should be closed. In the last month, they were able to sell 27 ipads and 56 MacBooks. However, in that same month, they made $13,405 while were able to profit above $100,000. After I calculated how much of the expenses that needed to be paid, I have found out that we needed to pay more money for it to be running. We needed to pay $32,262. Dallas Expenses is not able to meet our current standards and should be closed

For my case study I have chosen the Keep Dallas Beautiful, which is an extension of Keep Texas beautiful and Keep America beautiful. Keep Dallas Beautiful is an affiliate of theirs, which are volunteers or paid groups of people that help to bring together local clean up events, plan and put into action recycling programs, they also educate the communities on environmental issues (Keep, n.d.). This is a great sustainability case study because it meets the three sustainability pillars of environment, society, and economy. It is helping to keep the environment clean and makes sure to do their part in recycling. It encourages the community to do their part in beautifying the city and learning about environmental issues that they can help to alleviate.

The “Texas Department of Public Safety” (DPS) has the responsibility of protecting and serving the citizens of the State of Texas from a variety of risks, threats, and hazards. The State of Texas embraces a methodical approach when addressing threats against the public, public safety, and following threats faced by Americans; cyber threats, terrorism : crime, manmade and natural disasters, industrial accidents, and public health threats” (DPS, 2016).

Dallas County, Texas is the ninth largest county and occupies 871.28 square miles with 2,718 people per square mile (Census Bureau, 2015). A population growth occurred in the suburban areas which “can be attributed strong economic environment, business expansion, and employment opportunities” (Dallas County Health and Human Services, 2013). The Census Bureau lists the population on July 1, 2015 at 2,553,385 (Census Bureau, 2015). It increased 7.8% from April 1, 2010 to July 1, 2015. Of this population in 2014, 99% lived in urban community (City-Data, 2016). The races in Dallas County, Texas are: white, 67.7%; black, 23.1%; American Indian, 1.1%; Asian, 6.2%; two or more races, 1.8%; and Native Hawaiian, 0.1%. Females represent 50.6% of the population (City Data, 2016). The median resident age is 32 in Dallas County, Texas whereas for the State, it is 33 years. (City Data, 2016). The median household income in 2014 was $49,925; per capita income in 2014 was $27,195 with 19.3% people in poverty. The cost of living in Dallas County as of March 2016 is 94.2 which is less than average (City-Data, 2016). A number below 100 for a cost of living means it is cheaper to live in the area than the United States average.

Stakeholders are people or groups with interest in an organization that can affect or be affected by the organization itself, its objectives, or its policies (BusinessDictionary, 2015). Each stakeholder brings their own perspective to the table based on their relationship with the organization (e.g. internal or external role), their level of experience, and their area of expertise about the subject matter they are involved with. At a high level, the list of stakeholders for any organization could include people or groups such as: customers, employees, government agencies, suppliers, unions, community resources, shareholders, and business owners. For the purpose of this assignment, I will discuss and review stakeholders relative to the

The land that was chosen for the Airport site was in Adams County but it lacked infrastructure development. This means DIA will need to create that infrastructure like water, power, and sewage disposal. In turn, this will increase DIA project costs. In the case study from Project management: a systems approach to planning, scheduling and controlling, Adams County also negotiated an agreement with DIA but it limited DIA “to such businesses as airline maintenance, cargo, small package delivery, and other such airport-related activities” (Kerzner, 2001, p. 643). In both the examples, we see that negative stakeholder involvement was detrimental to

Where this agreement usually ends, however, is with the question of quality control refining processes from my viewpoint. Anotherwords, what control measures are enforced to ensure all contaminants are entirely removed to guarantee a high level of quality assurance and security of the petroleum sectors within the nation’s infrastructures? Are there residual contaminants affecting the quality of fuel supplied to the nation’s energy consumers? From a preceding viewpoint, it can be related to the Colorado Floods that occurred in September 2013. Even the prevailing thought of hazardous waste introduced to the Colorado geographical landscape does not eliminate the second and third order affects imposed on the nation’s petroleum pipeline infrastructure by way of corrosion, introducing chemicals into the pipeline arteries through small cracks that may extend beyond Colorado, an implication that cannot be ruled out. Water contamination prevention-or across the board programs-from the negative effect of hydraulic fracturing should be an expectation from petroleum energy producers. Moreover, it reminds us of an infrastructure security vulnerability, which is not often specified, when hydraulic fracturing is correlated to the role water functions through the conventional petroleum refining process, along with vast arrays of petroleum pipelines that exist across the nation’s geographical landscapes. These concerns should be brought

Local protective measure planning equips first responders with the knowledge needed to organize efficient response results in the event of an emergency. Structured open dialogue between local emergency jurisdictions enables responders to delegate the appropriate individuals and equipment resources to the impacted local areas requiring the most aid following a terror event. By establishing a streamlined communication framework, local emergency responders can collaborate their efforts and resources to promote collective well-being. When a local emergency plan specifies what responders and resources belong where and at what time, response overlap and shortages can be avoided. Unionized response action established prior to a terrorist incident, serves to mitigate the risks, hazards and threat of injury or harm the people and property of the US face when a terrorism event occurs. Furthermore, a structured local emergency operations plan for a hazardous materials incident involving a terrorist is imperative to public health and safety, as the blueprint outlines protective measures the public can follow to minimize their exposure to dangerous substances. The people of a community affected by a terror event can be warned and notified of the event’s associated dangerous materials, which threaten their well-being, through a variety of methods such as warning sirens or horns, emergency alert systems, automated

Hazardous materials releases can occur in any location and time. The potential of a release is dependent on the volume, distribution, and use of the hazardous substances within a particular area. Hazard identification, planning, and response preparedness is an ongoing process and must be addressed through a cooperative partnership between the public and private sectors (Washoe County LEPC, 2006).

Stakeholders are individuals or groups that partake, or assert, possession, privileges, or benefits in a, organization and its accomplishments, previously currently, and in the upcoming (Barrett, 2001). These requested privileges or benefits are the result of communications with, or activities reserved by the organization, and they must be lawful or ethical, separate or combined Stakeholders with comparable benefits, entitlements, or privileges can be categorized as fitting into the similar collection: personnel, investors, and clients (Barrett, 2001). The better the impact these groups have on client’s lives and the extra community assets with which they are assigned, and it becomes vital that they are responsible (Barrett, 2001).

The stakeholder theory made popular by Ed Freeman (1984) does seem to represent a major advance over the classical view (Freeman, 1984). It might seem inappropriate to refer to the stakeholder position as neoclassical. Bowie (1991: 56-66) has defined stakeholders as a group whose existence was necessary for the survival of the firm--stockholders, employees, customers, suppliers, the local community, and managers themselves.