Dana Goia's View Of The Literature Crisis

Gioia kicks off his essay first by telling us that young adults in our society are becoming more and more uninterested in liturature, that means our generations to come will also, very likely, be uninterested in the subject liturature. He tells the audiance these things so that we are aware of why bringing back liturature is so important.

In the article, "Why Writing Matters" by Dana Gioia, Gioia makes a contention asserting that the levels of intrigue youthful Americans have appeared in workmanship as of late have declined and that this pattern is an extreme issue with expansive outcomes. Methodologies Gioia utilizes to help his contention incorporate reference of convincing surveys, reports made by unmistakable associations that have issued contemplates, and a citation from a conspicuous creator. Gioia's general reason in composing this article has all the earmarks of being to draw consideration towards inadequacies in American interest in expressions of the human experience. His essential gathering of people would be the American open all in all with a huge concentrate on

Dana Gioia's purpose of this essay is to explain to society that reading less will mentally impact them. She is trying to get the message across to everyone, so that they understand the image that there setting on themselves, and impact that is has on them outside of literature. It is also impacting them in the business world. With there decline in reading, it holds there brain from opening up and really creating artistic ideas.

Art has been around for centuries, it has been used as a hobby, form of communication and for school purposes. Gioia uses facts from surveys like the 2002 public participation survey and the 2001 National Association of Manufacturers survey to support her claim that the declining of reading in America will have a negative effect on society.

Dana Gioia writes the article “Why Literature Matters” for all the readers of the New York Times. He expresses the importance of literature because of the consequences that could result from the lack of reading, especially for young adults between the age 18 and 24. Throughout the article he explains that reading and literacy have decreased even though “income rose to unforeseen levels, college attendance ballooned, and access to information increased enormously.” His diction thoroughly explains that reading has decreased while the resources and opportunities have increased. Gioia appeals logically by using evidence to support claims, appeals ethically by giving reasoning to develop ideas, and appeals emotionally by using diction to add power to the ideas expressed.

This information is quickly followed up in paragraph 8 by showing a correlation between this lack of understanding of historical and pollical awareness and the decline in reading. Gioia presents this information with the intention of showing backlash from the decrease in literature in younger ages, this is done by using a study performed on an age group like the people who were studied in paragraph 2. By doing this, Gioia provides an interrelationship between the decline in literature and the decline in historical and political awareness, doing this will show the gravity of the issue and will provide an even more firm stance on this

As I read, “The Dark Night of the Soul” by Richard E. Miller, I found it to be an interesting read. He inquires, why we read, why we write and what might literate arts be said to be good for? In his essay he describes the school massacres that have occurred throughout the years. As he describes these events, he asks a deeper question, “What is the point of continuing to read, write and learn in the face of such underlying dangers. I think that with all that is happening, individuals/students should continue with education because reading, television, writing and communication makes a difference in the lives of individuals around the world. The bottom line is that literary art has a way of touching students unexpectedly one way or another and students should not just throw the art away because of society’s perception.

“Why Literature Matters” by Dana Gioia is a brilliantly written essay highlighting the exact reason as to why literature really matters. The introduction to the essay is pulling and interesting, but has a stronger powerful feeling than actual facts. The second paragraph is, on the other hand, mainly factual. Gioia uses a survey to legitimize his claims, and describes the organization that distributes said survey. This provides the reader with a deeper sense of understanding, and builds a trust for the author.

In “Why Literature Matters”, Dana Gioia discusses the significant decrease of “interest [that] young Americans showed in the arts…” – more specifically “…the declining percentage of Americans…reading literature.” Due to Gioia’s usage of paths, ethos, and logos he is able to build and support his argument that literature is important “…to civic, personal, and economic health.”

Against the downturn in American literary compassion which encompasses the reading industry in a negative fashion, in his article "Why literature matters", Dana Gioia has depicted reading as a core asset in any intellect-based society or civic spheres. By lending his American readers' ears on the claims voiced by prominent figures, the author aims to show young readers how their growing dislike toward literature will ensure future occupational hardships and poor social engagement.

In this paper I will talk about myself and how much I enjoy literature. I enjoy English. It makes me feel smart and it makes me dig a little deeper. Certain books make students think, make the students do research, make students find the deeper meaning. English expands teens vocabulary. This subject just makes kids and teens want to learn more about literature.

Daniel Okrent has been in the publishing industry his whole career. He is a published author and has served as an editor for Time, Life, and the New York Times. In a 1999 lecture to students attending Columbia University’s School of Journalism, Okrent predicts, “I believe they (news papers, magazines, and books), and all forms of print are dead” (Okrent 578). A little harsh, wouldn’t you agree? But fear not, he then goes on to describe how even though the death of print is inevitable, it really doesn’t make a difference because it is the words, sentences, and paragraphs in those forms of print that are important. Now, the majority of the reading I

There is a no more challenging task than defending an apparently lost cause and this is precisely what I am doing today. However, I have never shied away from any of my responsibilities. Like a medieval gladiator, I will fight to death for the permanence of Literature in the student’s curricula. Depriving a human being from the power of creation, imagination, which has the extraordinary gift of taken us to an unimaginable dimension is the worst mistake we can possible make.

Since the Mid 20th century literature has been a prominent aspect of life in American culture, beginning how to read it in childhood to benefiting by it throughout adulthood. Throughout the texts “Heels over Hemingway”, “Why Literature Matters” , and “Good-bad books” all argue the idea that literature has changed over the years, due to the fact that the world around us has changed as well which effects literature. For this reason Dowd, Orwell, and Gioia assert to their audience the importance of literature, and that it should have a place in society by utilizing rhetorical strategies such as analogies, ethos, pathos, logos, and diction.

The early 1900s ushered in a new age of literature and way of thinking in the wake of changing traditions, cultures, and the dissolution of values and humanity caused by capitalism and materialism. This era, known as the modernist period, were made up of authors - from all walks of life - who sought to defy and contest the traditional and new age problems through works of literature. As the result of this, many underlying issues in society were exposed as being double standard, or age old primitive and religious dogmatic traditions from earlier time periods. Brought about by World War One, the emancipation of women occurred when the young, healthy men were overseas fighting. This forced women of all social statuses, to take up men duties. However, after the men returned from war, the women were forced back into the traditional position of their gender. Bringing forth the crisis of gender identity in mostly women and reestablishing gender inequality in the patriarchal society of the early 1900s.