Daphne is a fourteen-years old girl who have a great life ahead of her, with a wealthy parent that can afford to provide Daphne with treatment she solely needs. Also, based on a statement from one of her teacher in school; which stated that Daphne is “kind and warm”. Daphne is just a child that needs more love, and attention, and waving her case to adult court with likely hood of her serving 25 years of her life is a bit too much for a little girl her age. However, keeping her here in juvenile court where she can get the best treatments she need rather than punishment. As a defense lawyer, and knowing the consequences of the crime she committed against another person a 44 years old man who was murdered in the company of her, and Mr. Chris. Moving ahead, on that horribly day, Daphne was drink with Chris. Also, a record has been showed that Daphne have a drinking problem and Chris on the other hand takes two drugs Zoloft, antidepressant and Lorazepam a sedative for his anxiety attacks. With …show more content…
And beyond all reasonable doubt, this young girl has displayed an illness through her action which need to be treated, and not punished. Moving forward, in as much as Daphne is showing the notion that seen as a girl who is a calculating criminal, and that understood the seriousness of her actions. But in her brain development, she is not. From medical stand point, a teenage brain isn’t fully developed, and will not be until the age of 25 years which clearly Daphne is only 14 years. Still on the same view, an adult think with the prefrontal cortex, the brain’s rational part. This part of adult brain responds to situations with good judgment and awareness of long-term consequences. But contrary to this, teenager’s brains are connected between emotional part and decision-making center. These brains are still developing and not necessarily at the same
Paul Thompson in the article, Startling Finds Teenage Brains, explains that a teen named Nathaniel Brazill was ruled by a Florida grand jury, who had previously ruled Brazill, was going to be tried as an adult. Thompson supports his explanation by first analyzing the problem and if Brazill had been tried before. He then investigates the situation and why teens decide to commit crimes. Lastly, the author explains how there was a university that researched why teens act the way they do. They were surprised at what they found out. They found out that massive loss of brain tissue occurs in the teen years. Thompson’s purpose is to show why teens commit crimes and act the way they act in order so that their parents take care of their teens and so
The court decision was influenced by Graham and Roper cases that established for sentencing reasons children are different from adults under the constitution. Children lack maturity and have no developed sense of responsibility. This leads them to be impulsive and reckless. In Roper it was held children are exposed to outside pressure and negative influences from friends. Therefore, they have less control of their environment because the child’s nature is not2 well informed. Graham and Roper emphasized distinguishing traits of children weakening justification for inflicting harsh sentences to juveniles even when they commit outrageous crimes.
An “audit failure” is a situation in which a professional auditor fails to detect a material error in the financial statements of the company they are auditing. The audit failure in the situation of Rita Crundwell the failure was exacerbated by the fact that the auditors continually signed off on the misstated statements for years. Crundwell is responsible for many of the deficiencies mentioned, such as the missing funds and the incorrect invoices. However, she is not the sole person responsible for this fraud. The lack of internal control is to blame, and this cannot be placed on a single person. The government should have separated duties and used
Next Horney explains that children undergo painful experiences of being betrayed and lied to. They may also have to submit to taking second place to a family member. The child is helpless in all of this and the child's only way to vent fury and anger is in the form of extravagant fantasies. These fantasies are often brutal, criminal, and destructive in nature. The child's inability to understand these destructive forces makes them equally fearful of adults.
Childhood is an important time in a person’s life, a time where one can be carefree and do as they please without having to worry about what others think of them. During this stage of life, children are groomed and prepared for the transition between childhood and adulthood to be as smooth as possible. However, in Heather O’Neil’s novel, Lullabies for Little Criminals, Baby throws herself into the adult world without giving any second thought or even having the proper knowledge to survive or even to manage herself. This causes her to follow the wrong paths and trust the wrong people. Baby grows wise beyond her years, and soon becomes stuck in the middle of the two worlds, as she is too young for the adult world but too old for the child world. This traps her with her having nowhere else to go except continue on the path she is already heading. Baby’s loss of innocence at such a young age showcases that one cannot properly mature and be ready for the future without having a stable childhood. This loss is shown through Jules’ lack of parental ability, her exposure to the adult world at a young age, and her struggle with herself. Adding all three together causes damage to Baby that no one should experience.
Julie Mialaret is my mother and she is 53 years old. My mother exercises very rarely because of her intense work schedule. She says it is hard for her to have the energy everyday to work out after long work hours. She has never smoked in her life because she does not find it appealing. Mrs. Mialaret eats a very low-fat diet and eats very small portions. My mother eats very healthy and is able to maintain her weight without exercise. She faces no barriers when it comes to eating healthy because growing up she ate little portions and couldn't afford fast food. I would like to change my eating habits to better reflect my mom's diet however, I would like to incorporate some sort of exercise into my daily routine. My mom hopes to start exercising
Considering the behaviors of an adolescent in the same manner as that of an adult is unfair. Juvenile brains are still developing, which means that they perform differently than adult brains (AACAP). Adolescents are more likely to act on impulse, get involved in fights, and engage in risky or dangerous behavior. They are less likely to think before they act or consider the consequences of their actions (AACAP). Weighing this scientific fact, it is unfair to assume that a juvenile committed a delinquent act with the same forethought of an adult. The mental development of a juvenile makes it difficult to prove that they established the mens rea equal to that of an adult guilty of the same offense.
Pincham, H. L., Bryce, D., & Pasco Fearon, R. M. (2015). The neural correlates of emotion processing in juvenile offenders. Developmental Science, 18(6), 994-1005. doi:10.1111/desc.12262
When a child is forced to make decisions alone at such a young age their innocence is robbed from them and their development is lead down a path which they are not yet ready for. Her actions are a classic example of this and the path which she was lead down was paved with boy after boy.
The courts current stance on the situation is that lack of maturity and an under developed sense of responsiblity leaves a juvinile susceptible and vulnerable to outside influences and negativity. (Seiter ,
In today’s society there has been an increase in the crimes committed by juveniles. Most juveniles have underlining factors that have caused them to choose this type of lifestyle. Many children in the juvenile system have come from impoverish stricken neighborhoods and are festered with gang activity which has made them a product of their environment. The minds of adolescents do not allow them to see how they are affecting their lives. A study was conducted, and according to the article, “Adolescents in Adult Court: Does the Punishment Fit the Criminal?”, when children mature, they will look back at their past and possibly leave their surroundings. Think about two people committing the same crime, both with the same thought process and ability to make decisions, except one is a juvenile and the other is grown. Due to the lack of experience in decision-making or the time to evaluate the situation like the adult, the youth should be viewed as irresponsible. The fact that a child’s mind is still maturing should reassure people that they will not be the same person incarcerated a few years later.
For example, in this book, Clair found that video of Michel was killing homeless around the ATM machine with Rick. But, Clair wanted him not to have punishment from public court because Rick is her biological son and she thinks teens who are the same age as he can hit someone or can have violent action against other people. Also, Clair tried to connive what Michel and Rick did to the homeless. I think this conniving of her son’s action is not protecting her child because what Michel did was a crime; it is not a simple problem such as fighting with friends and family. She used some example to persuade that why their children must not be going to jail even though they killed someone to Serge and Babettee. The example that she used was there are a lot of homeless in the world, and they can sleep in everywhere that people couldn’t expect. Clair stated that what are you going to do if homeless sleeps in front of your front door of your house. This statement made me thinking more about her characteristics. I can assume that Michel was growing himself with watching violence relationship between his mom and dad. This violence effects himself of killing another person is fine. If my child was really young and killed someone in late, I will accuse my child as murder to the police because I want him to realize the importance of human life and all of actions must have consequences either punishment or
A number of researchers have suggested over years that teenage brains are not yet fully developed. At the National Institute of Mental Health researchers have studied the human brain ever since the stage of birth all the way to adulthood, to prove that the brain is not complete. When it comes to this topic, Americans assume that if a teenage commits a crime than they should not be held accountable because of their age. Yet they must consider that teens are capable of understanding the situation they are in, how they are looked upon as young adults,, and how they should learn from their mistakes.
Both Berk (2010) and Lucile Packard Children's Hospital at Stanford (2012) claim that by this age an adolescent should be thinking in more abstract, systematic and logical ways. Therefore, according to the articles researched for this issue and the behavior exhibited by this adolescent would indicate a delay in cognitive development. This delay not only affects his personal reasoning, but also has delayed his cognitive development to solve hypothetical problems, thus, lower his ability solve situations not yet experienced. Remaining in the concrete operational
According to the article,”Startling Finds on Teenage Brains” , on paragraph seven the teenager’s brain is not aware about the the risk taking, self control and controlling impulses. This shows that teenages don’t have a clue on what they are doing until they do the crime. The lost of brain tissue is seen in every teen no matter how intelligent they are and therefore they can’t control what their about to do because the brain isn’t thinking properly and isn't thinking about the consequences their action will bring. People who disagree will bring up to have someone supervise the juveniles 24/7 and there already is and they’re called parents but if they’re being supervised a lot how will they become