Darfur And The Rwandan Genocide Essay

Did you know one out of twelve people died as a result of the Darfur genocide? The Darfur genocide was part of the ongoing Sudanese civil war in Darfur. The rebel sides are the Sudan Liberation Movement and the Justice Equality Movement. The Janjaweed, or Sudan’s government-funded military, retaliated against the rebellion by attacking and killing the civilians in Darfur. These practices went on long enough that it was considered a genocide. The Darfur crisis was one of the most tragic events in the last twenty years, and affected families in many ways including the brutal treatment of natives, moving to refugee camps, and the loss of home villages and possessions.

Whether or not Darfur should be assisted due to the genocide occurring there is a highly debated subject, as you must know. However, I believe that the United States should stay out, because we need the resources, the assets we send over could be used against those in need, and despite it being horrible, it is not the worst thing going on in Africa. This issue has not caused everyone to go running to save them in the past, so why the sudden change?

History has a funny way of repeating itself. After World War II, the United States and the rest of the international community promised to do all they could to prevent future genocides. However this was a promise they were unable to keep. In 1994 when Rwanda went through genocide the United States and U.N were absent, leaving the Tutsis to be brutally murdered by the Hutus. As a consequence 800,000 Tutsis and moderate Hutus were killed and dumped into mass graves. Once again the United States and U.N promised to do more, but this time it was too late.

The Darfur Genocide started on February 26, 2003. This genocide is still continuing till this day. Darfur Genocide is the mass slaughter of Darfuri men, women, and children in Sudan. This is happening because of the oppression of Darfur’s non-Arab population.. The people started to revolt and wanted the government to stop the oppressing of the non–Arab population. The government did not listen and got violent with the people. When the Sudan Liberation Army (SLA) and the Justice and Equality Movement (JEM) started to attack the government, the government responded with there own attack. The Sudanese government decided to use the Janjaweed a Sudanese military group to attack the non–Arab population. Now because of the Janjaweed millions of people

(2004) Stopping Genocide: Should the U.S. and U.N. take actions in Sudan? I was very sad. Sudan's president Omar Al-Bashir was horrible. He allowed his position as a leader to turn into a dictatorship. His hunger for power was misplaced by the support for the people of Sudan. Another issue was that he was racist again his own people. No one has the right to make a decision to take anyone life. Omar Al-Bashir attempted to take out a race of people. He allow women and children to be rapped and enslaved. In the 1990s, Sudan’s links with international terrorist organizations led the United States to designate Sudan a state sponsor of terrorism in 1993 and suspend U.S. Embassy operations in 1996 (U.S. Department of State Diplomacy in Action,

Genocide is defined as "Article II: In the present Convention, genocide means any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such: (a) Killing members of the group; (b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group; (c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part; (d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group; (e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group”(Stanton). In the past few years there have been mass killings in the Darfur region of South Sudan along with many rapes and rehoming of African people. The have been militia

On April 6 1994, President Habyarimana’s plane was shot down after leaving a ceasefire negotiation with Rwandese Patriotic Front (RPF) in Tanzania. Which lead to what is known today as the genocide in Rwanda; a three-month period in which 333 people were killed every hour, or about five people every minute (125). All while the International powers that could have stepped in and made a difference either ignored the situation or supported and enabled the massacre. Gourevitchs book probably provides one of the clearest pictures on the ways that hundreds of thousands of lives could have been saved with just a little bit of intervention on behalf of the international community, or in some cases the seizure of international intervention. However,

The problems of today can often be traced in the beginnings of yesterday. The Rwandan Genocide was a divisive division of two groups that culminated in the mass murder of nearly 500,000 Rwandans, three-fourths of the population. The tactful subterfuge by the ruling party fueled the separation of two ethnic groups that reminisce the events in Europe 55 years earlier. Naturally, the question becomes, how? Simply speaking it was the indifference of global elites and political demagoguery that incited fears into violent acts; however delving further into the matter it is important to see that “those who control the past control the future and those who control the present, control the past.” In other words, to understand the events of April 1994, we must understand events prior.

“One ugly, deadly and recurrent reality check persists: genocide. Genocide has occurred so often and so uncontested in the last fifty years that an epithet more apt in describing recent event than the often chanted “Never Again” (Power 1998, p. 1). Genocide is one of the most devastating phenomena in the international community it is so often unchallenged that the occurrences continue to repeat. While envisioning the impending danger of these incidents, it is necessary, through cross-country comparison to understand what drives and sustains genocide. This essay will analyze three paradigms that are suggested causes of the phenomena, idealism, political, and state interest while assessing the genocides in both Rwanda and Darfur in order to prevent

This essay will argue to what extent the mass murder in Sudan can be considered a genocide or a civil war. Resources will be referred to in order to support the argument and counter-argument. The situation in Dufar, Sudan will be expanded on, so that the reader is informed and educated as to weather the situation that is happening in Darfur is a genocide in contrast to a civil war.

Globalization didn’t contribute to the Darfur crisis as it could have. For a long time now, there has been an emphasis on global inequality, on genocides and on internal struggles in a country as a consequence of globalization. In 1948, the General Assembly of the United Nations adopted the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which says that ‘‘all human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights’’. (United Nations, 1789) This declaration clearly states that all human have rights and freedom. This was advancement and progression due to globalization. Worlds where all people are born equal and are free. This global awareness of human rights violation can be explained by the situation in Darfur.

It is disappointing that the history of Rwanda,..., may still repeat itself. I may not have the power or influence to stop this tragedy, but I am not going to sit idly by and watch another tragedy continue to unfold before my eyes” US House2 5). Genocide has been around for centuries and unfortunately countries such as Rwanda had to witness the atrocities of genocide. Unlike the holocaust, the Hutus main goal was to slaughter as many Tutsi as they could in as little as 100 days. It is equally important to remember those that suffered from this historical event will never forget it. The Rwandan genocide was a 100 day massacre that was started by the Hutu President’s place accident, which was blamed on the Tutsi from previous political disputes. All in all, the question still remains whether the Hutus shot their own president's plane down to start a war of massacre or if the Tutsi were really trying to regain

In March 2004, the world was taken aback when Mukesh Kapila, a United Nations (UN) Human Rights Coordinator for Sudan, announced during an interview with the UN that the “world’s greatest humanitarian crisis” was occurring in Darfur. Until then, the world had been concerned by the raging civil war in South Sudan and the peace talks associated with it. Darfur was a nowhere, unknown and uncared about for centuries. Suddenly newspapers were wild with reports of the 21st Century’s first genocide, and support was being drummed up from all corners of the world. But then the Asian tsunami on 26 December 2004 occurred and what is known as “world opinion” moved on to bigger disasters. Yet the crisis in Darfur continued; however, now organizations such as the UN, European Union (EU), and African Union (AU) began to take interest, develop aid packages, and planned for intervention. Yet still, in 2016, the crisis continues. Several

The killings began in 2003, when the government sent out Arab Janjaweed Militias and they started killing the non-Arab villagers in sudan even know the non-Arab villagers weren't doing anything. The Government sent out Janjaweed also known as “Devil on horseback” to attack the villages and destroy communities. The Janjaweed Militias stole or burned food and livestock, and burned down houses and even poisoned water wells. They would brutally slash and burn them seriously hurting. while that was happening on the ground the government was attacking civilians in the sky by shooting and bombing them from helicopters. leaving 400,000 dead and 3 million displaced. The genocide is happening in Western Sudan. It all started when the conflict between

Difficulties in stopping this world order conflict in Sudan arose from factors such as the use of the veto power in the UN Security Council to prevent the UN imposing sanctions and stopping the conflict. This was seen in China’s use of the veto power in regards to the conflict in Sudan, resulting in a prolonging of the conflict, “China has used its veto at the UN Security Council to block moves to impose sanctions on Sudan unless it stops the fighting in Darfur” (BBC, 2007). Thus, the conflict in Darfur, Sudan is an example of a world order conflict associated with access to resources as well as a conflict which has difficulties stopping due to factors such as use of the veto