Darlene Druyun and Mike Sears Ethical Violation Essay

Although many things about engineering are positive there is a dark side. We depend on them and while engineers are making innovations for us, and maintaining life as the way we know it they also struggle with ethical issues such as plagiarism, confidentiality, and whistleblowing. Just like the list of golden rules we learned as young children, engineers uphold a list of ethical rules to guide them to make the ethically correct decision when one of these situations arise. Bribery the act of receiving or giving a gift with something required in return is another example of an ethical issue that can entice engineers to break the code (“Gifts and Bribes”, 2006). Unfortunately this was the case for a former manager of the Army Corps of Engineers whose greed caused him to break the ethical canons to “avoid deceptive acts”, to “conduct themselves honorably, responsibly, and lawfully as to enhance the honor, reputation, and usefulness of the profession”, and finally to “hold paramount the safety, health and welfare of the public” (“Code of Ethics”). His misconduct is an example of the unethical decisions some engineers make.

de le Fortrie’s office, the kind of employee that any manager would be a fool to let go of, but this employee had a habit of posting that he worked nine hours instead of the actual seven. As it is with most evil or immoral things, no one was getting hurt by this little lie and when the allegations were brought to the employee’s manager, a blind eye was turned. After all, the work was getting done, was it not? The truth eventually reached a Business Conduct Officer, Mr. de le Fortrie, from a disgruntled and secret source and in order to maintain and salvage the company’s good name, the hammer had to fall. Mr. de le Fortrie explained to the manager and employee that not only did this act of dishonesty harm Northrop Grumman’s reputation, but it also affected them financially, since the company was obligated to refund the Department of Defense for every faked hour the employee falsely claimed. Based on the recommendation of Mr. de le Fortrie and several other company officers, the employee was eventually terminated from the company and the manager was given a one year letter of concern and required to attend integrity training.

The engineers shouldn’t only be loyal for their company; they should put their duty first. Not only did the Aberdeen Three violate the code of ethics, but their employees working under them as well as the military base did. According to the NSPE Code of Ethics, they should have known better to report unethical engineers to authorities, as these wrongdoings were continuous for multiple years before they were

Deborah, worked as a bar tender in Ajax, Ontario. The sixty-six year-old owner began to show interest quickly and sexual advances began. Deborah was frequently asked on dates, slapped on her bottom, and received unwelcoming comments about her body. As the advances continued, the owner began to describe what he would sexually do to her, such as to “bend her over the pool table and smack her bare ass” (Hunter 2014). Deborah was fired after testifying to the sexual harassment charges. After, the bar owner delivered letters to Deborah’s home that said how he wished they could have had a relationship. This directly violates principle eight of ethical conduct as the owner did not act appropriately when

On February 16, 2016, the United States Securities and Exchange Commission released a statement announcing the settlement of a case concerning a technology company’s violation of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA). The software company PTC Inc. came under SEC investigation when it was discovered that two of its Chinese subsidiaries provided Chinese government officials with non-business related trips to places like Hawaii and Las Vegas, as well as improper gifts, including iPods, gift cards, and wine in order to win business. This act comes in direct violation with the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act which prohibits that all U.S. companies and their subsidiaries of bribing foreign officials in an effort to gain business opportunities (Clarkson, Miller, Cross 108). A case like this can play a significant role in the reputation of a company and how it is viewed not only on a domestic scale but an international scale as well. However, PTC’s responsible handling of the situation allowed the company to address and take care of the issue while maintaining

There are many factors and areas to be considered if Carl Kotchian’s actions for the corporation were ethical and legal. It looks like bribes were big part of Japanese business in the 1970's. By accepting the deal, Kotchian provided jobs for thousands of employees for the Lockheed Company. The deal also took care of the Lockheed shareholders, and their families. For

Knowingly committing and concealing fraudulent activities is undoubtedly illegal. If I were a manager during this scandal, my initial focus with my employees would have been centered around ensuring all employees understood and adhered to all laws associated with the reporting and manufacturing of our products. By creating a common understanding (Proverbs 4:7), it increases the likelihood that employees will have the same ethical baseline. If we don?t have this focus, James Lewis vs. Caterpillar bulldozer vs Whayne Supply Company confirm that the legislative exposure and jurisdiction is inherently broader (Kubasek, 2016).

Two professional colleagues, Mary and Jerry, are having a mock debate about the reporting of ethical violations. On the one hand, Mary thinks that unethical conduct should be reported to avoid in the future. On the other hand, Jerry says the reporting is not worth the effort because the one who reported the unethical behavior could be more harmed that the reported person, because of the tattling effect. This paper provides five reasons why it may be and may be not acceptable to report possible ethical violations based on the conversation of two colleagues and discusses the individual opinion of the author about addressing ethical violations.

Transparency: Deciding that Union Carbide was unethical with their decision to use their legal tools to avoid a billion dollar lawsuit, Union Carbide, as well as their employees will be upset. They believed they were making an ethical decision for the company, and from a business prospective on the issue they were. Top management had to think about the company and its employees, they did not want to leave their employees jobless, and see their families suffer,

In 1975 there were hearings regarding Gulf Oil, Northrop, Mobil Oil, and Lockheed. Each one of these corporations were each examples that had an allegation or had already made admissions, concerning questionable payments made directly or indirectly to foreign government officials or parties that all were involved with business. For instance, Gulf Oil involved contributions to the political campaign of the President of the Republic of Korea. Next there was the Northrop case. It involved payments to a Saudi Arabian general. Another one is when Exxon was giving contributions to Italian political parties. Besides that, Mobil Oil also involved influences to Italian political parties. The Lockheed scandal was an example of a very well-known case

In January of 2013, Jim Webb reported a billing scheme that had been conducted by The Boeing Company. From 2006 to 2013, The Boeing Company had maintained the C-17 Globemaster airplane at the Long Beach Depot. While in this contract, Boeing had submitted claims for 8-hour work shifts performed by its employees, but the problem was they knew the claims were fraudulent in that time spent at lunch and extended breaks was contained in the billing and was not refundable per the contract. Later

Honesty and Fair Dealing – Texas City Explosion 2005 & Prudhoe Bay A-22 Explosion 2002

Frank, manager of corporate reporting at Amalgamated Forest Products, has threatened to go public with information regarding a falsified report on the effect of effluent controls on the discharge of wastewater from pulp and paper companies, which has angered his boss, Jim McIntosh and the company’s president, Jim Letourneau. Letourneau was to testify before a legislative subcommittee the following week and use the report, “Endangered Species: The Pulp and Paper Industry in the Upper Peninsula”, to give the industry’s perspective on proposed legislation. The section of the report which contained the falsified financial information was prepared by Tina

After difficulties ascended in the persuasion of gaining government funds, Lockheed’s executives turned to unorthodox sale methods. They found willing countries to partner with, some with access to extra funds that wouldn’t be tracked closely. At this time, bribery overseas was not even illegal under American law; Corporations doing business in other countries were presumed to be subject to the laws in those places (Terris, 2005, p.56). The numbers of aircrafts sold were lower than the company had hoped for. A financial disaster was avoided by using a questionable business practice. After taking another large gamble, Lockheed reengaged with their overseas executives to increase cash flow, sometimes in the form of corrugated orange cardboard boxes and airline flight bags stuffed with

It was stated in an article in the March 2008 Tribune Business News that, “Although the relationship did not directly violate Boeing's code of conduct, the board determined that there were