preview

Daru's Integrity In Albert Camus The Guest

Decent Essays

Life is full of challenges made to test one’s integrity. It is impossible for one to live life without encountering a decision that questions their identity. This test of character ultimately shows what kind of person one truly is. When faced with challenges an individual can react in a plethora of ways. Like in the story “The Guest” by Albert Camus, the main character, Daru is given the orders to take a man accused of murder to jail. Unknowingly to Daru, the prisoner comes from poverty and does not understand the extent of his actions. Daru has the choice of either taking the man to prison or setting him free, but he chooses neither and decides to let the Arab decide for himself. Daru’s choice is his way of dodging the issue and avoiding the …show more content…

When the Arab is first presented he is displayed as a slave. “Balducci was holding on the end of a rope an Arab who was walking behind him with hands bound and head lowered” (Camus 2254). Daru tried to view this man as someone less than human. This attitude fostered his unwillingness to determine the Arab’s fate. Throughout the entire story the Arab never receives a name, as he is described as ‘the Arab’ forty seven times. Daru never thought to ask his name, signaling an act that would show that they were both men and equal. Daru has no intention of viewing the Arab as equal to himself. Daru says “he could break his adversary in two” (Camus 2259). He feels this way because he thinks he is superior to him, and when compared to the Arab is in more exceptional shape. Daru is fed daily, while the Arab was desperate enough to kill for food and was described with a “…thin, muscular chest” (Camus 2256). Daru, in a way, wished to change the Arab’s life. Even though he knew the right thing was freeing the Arab, Daru’s unwillingness to decide whether or not to take the Arab to jail results in his choice of cowardice. He decides to let the Arab decide what to do because he did not want the responsibility of the outcome Arab’s life on his conscience. When he presented the choices to the Arab “a sort of panic was visible in his expression” (Camus 2261). Daru’s decision in no way helped the Arab. If he were to go to freedom it would be with unfamiliar people, and he would have to live “according to their law” (Camus 2261). Meaning, he still may have been judged for his crimes or possibly live an adverse life in a new environment. If the Arab chose jail, which he did, he would be going to an unfair trial with people like Daru who could not look at the situation from the Arab’s perspective. Either way Daru knew he wanted to keep the Arab safe, but he

Get Access