Darwin's Argumentative Essay

Charles Darwin proposed the theory of evolution to explain the origin, diversity and complexity of life. I will will disprove evolution by showing that natural selection only explains small evolutionary changes, collectively known as microevolution. Natural selection cannot drive large evolutionary changes, macroevolution. I will also show that the primordial soup, in which life supposedly evolved, did not exist.

In an instant life was created. But the type of life that was created differs depending on who is asked. Scientists would claim that single-celled organisms were the first to be created, and only by evolution and survival of the fittest did humans come to be. Religious people would refute that claim and state that humans were created in the image and likeness of god and all other animals came separately and not by chance. This argument has plagued the world since Charles Darwin released his theory in 1859. It came to a point in Dayton, Tennessee with the Scopes Trial, also known as the “Monkey Trial”. This eleven-day trial pitted faith against reason and left a legacy of conflict in schoolrooms and legislature across America.

The Japanese attack on Darwin on the 19th February 1942, did not happen by chance but from the work of a major contributing factor leading to various consequences and eventually cementing the event as a significant one.

As humans evolve, they will change. Through the years, humans will both change mentally and physically. Through research and reasoning, people can only predict what might be the next human evolution. Much of what is predicted is based on the world that humans live in today. Some day, humans might be even be able to change their own genetics as science and technology advances.

During the second world war on 19 February 1942 Darwin came under attack for the ever first time when Japanese militaries mounted two air raids on Darwin, Darwin was heavily bomb just before 10am. Australia mainland came under attack for the first time when the Japanese air forces mounted two air attacks on Darwin. The two assaults, which were planned and ordered by the commander responsible for the attack on Pearl Harbour ten weeks previous, involved 54 land-based bombers and around 188 attack aircraft which were launched from four Japanese aircraft-carriers in the Timor Sea. When the Japanese attack Darwin for the second time, which began about an 1 hour later and lasted about 20-25 minutes, involved high altitude bombing of the Royal Australian

Charles Darwin was born on February 12, 1809. His mother died when he was eight so he grew up with his father at the Mount. Ever since he was a young boy he could entertain himself for hours by thinking and watching animals and nature. He would collect things and observe them. He also made notes on how the animals acted and behaved. Charles hated the school he attended when he was little because it didn't teach him anything. The only things that they did try to teach him in school, he wasn't interesting in learning. Then, at age 16, he went to medical school. Charles didn't like his medical school classes either, and one of the reasons is because of the operation on a screaming child. Charles only liked science.

The defense are the ones who truly won, even if the jury of a small religious town finds the defense guilty. It really doesn’t mean that the defense lost, how can they even find them guilty anyway? No one in the jury heard of Charles Darwin or read his books, so they wouldn’t even know if it is evil or made by the Devil. They just took the Bible and their religion too far, they shouldn’t just read the Bible and throw away everything that isn’t apart of religion away. The town of Hillsboro and the people living in it should read the books which Charles Darwin wrote, before they choose who won and lost. Even in the trial, Drummond was winning and the jury were starting to choose his side. But at the end they still found Cates guilty, it seems

"Regardless of their influence in the past, who will have more influence on the future of humanity, Adam Smith or Charles Darwin, and why?"

Charles Darwin's theory of evolution centres on the idea that species compete to survive, and favorable characteristics are passed on from one generation to the next. Darwin said that evolution took place by a process of natural selection or survival of the fittest. This meant that the animals and plants best suited to their surroundings survived and were able to pass on their genes to their offspring. The ones that weren't best suited died off and didn't get the chance to reproduce.

The definition of Evolution is ¨the process by which different kinds of living organisms are thought to have developed and diversified from earlier forms during the history of the earth,¨ (Dictionary.com, 2018). Although, the actual definition is hard to comprehend. Some consider Evolution to be a somewhat ridiculous topic that is far from true. Though others believe that, ¨Evolution by natural selection is one of the best substantiated theories in the history of science, supported by evidence from a wide variety of scientific disciplines, including paleontology, geology, genetics and developmental biology,¨ (Than, 2018). The main idea of Biological Evolution is that all life on Earth share a common ancestor. The term is a way of understanding life.

Do you believe the entire universe was miraculously created from a giant spinning ball of dirt, or do you believe that a banana and a human are related? Creationism proves evolution wrong in many ways, such as the Big bang theory, how every living being has a common ancestor which is a single celled organism, and dating how old the rocks and fossils are. People often debate how the world was formed or created. Some people believe that the universe was miraculously created from a spinning ball of gas and dirt. Then one day it unexpectedly exploded, creating all the galaxies and living creatures over billions of years. This would be known as the Big Bang Theory. They believe this this as it matches up with their

In 1895 Charles Darwin published a book describing his theory of evolution, and his theory of the natural selection process. This theory caused much uproar in the religious community because Darwin’s theory went against the story of creation portrayed in the Holy Bible. His theory claimed that all life currently in place had evolved and adapted from a single organism in the beginning. Over time and by process of natural selection only the dominant species were left over while the other, less dominant species, went extinct. His theory, backed by scientific analysis, had dismissed the idea of a single deity creating all life on Earth. It is not like Darwin had a personal agenda against religion or anything,

Darwin and Evolution are inextricably linked in the minds of most people who have had the opportunity to study them in basic biology. However, Darwin's theories of selection and survival of the fittest have been applied to moral, economic, political, and other cultural aspects of society. Dennett briefly touched on some of the political and social ramifications of Darwin's theories in the final chapter of Darwin's Dangerous Idea. Other philosophers and thinkers have also adapted Darwin's evolutionary ideas, in order to apply them in a societal or cultural context. One great example of this adaptation of the biological concept of evolution, is the appearance of Social Darwinism during the 19th century.

During the time when Charles Darwin was alive (1809-1882) most of the Western culture believed that the world was created by God and only several thousand years old. They believed that our world was always like it was then. So when Darwin wrote The Origin of Species it shook up both the cultural and scientific views of his time. His views that evolution occurs by natural selection was one of the most radial theories during his time, yet today is widely accepted as a fact among most of the world.

Before the theory of evolution was a widespread theory in the world of science, Greek and Roman philosophers had their own theories about how life came to its present state and where it was going from there. One theory at the time was that all organisms are reflections of a “perfect” form and were coming closer to it all the time, although this was the less accepted theory even though it was closer to the truth proven hundreds of years after, while another was that all things were simply places on Earth in their present form, common to modern day Creationism. Even after this, Darwin was not the first to try explain evolution, he just provided convincing proof and published his ideas. The publishing of Darwin’s Theory of Evolution was