Essay about Darwin’s Theory of Natural Selection and Social Darwinism

2627 Words11 Pages
Anyone with even a moderate background in science has heard of Charles Darwin and his theory of evolution. Since the publishing of his book On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection in 1859, Darwin’s ideas have been debated by everyone from scientists to theologians to ordinary lay-people. Today, though there is still severe opposition, evolution is regarded as fact by most of the scientific community and Darwin’s book remains one of the most influential ever written. Its influence has even extended into realms other than biology and science. An entire method of looking at and interpreting society has come into being partly from the ideas of Darwin. This methodology is known as social darwinism.…show more content…
“Nature secures each...advance by a succession of trials, which are perpetually repeated, and cannot fail to be repeated, until success is achieved. All mankind in turn subject themselves more or less to the discipline described; they either may or may not advance under it; but, in the nature of things, only those who do advance under it eventually survive. For, necessarily, families and races whom this increasing difficulty of getting a living which excess of fertility entails, does not stimulate to improvements in production - that is, to greater mental activity - are on the high road to extinction; and must ultimately be supplanted by those whom the pressure does so stimulate.”[3] Here, the basis of Spencer’s social darwinism is seen. Those humans who are less intelligent or prosperous are weeded out by the evolution of society. Spencer elaborates on societal evolution in his book Social Statics. As society evolves, it is always striving for the ideal. “So long as society is let alone, its various structures will go on developing in due subordination to one another...Be sure, also, that whenever there arises a special necessity for the better performance of any one function, or for the establishment of some new function, Nature will respond.”[4] Since nature will take the responsibility for perfecting society, it follows that humans should not interfere with nature’s plan. In Spencer’s eyes, then,
Open Document