Data Management And Quality Control Essay

The participants were recruited through convenience sampling method. They completed the informed consent before giving the questionnaires. The participants were received extra credit in exchange for their participation

Provided to each subject was a consent form to review and sign before their participation in this study. The researcher excluded any identifiable information from the data collection measures. Subjects received a number as they signed in for the information session. The researcher used these numbers to link the subjects to their surveys and their clinical assessments. Their numbers coordinated with the attendance form which was in the sole possession of the researcher. Institution

This question guides the course of the research study and guides researchers in setting up the study effectively and accurately. It is important, throughout the course of research, to ensure that additional questions do not cloud the initial research question (Farrugia et al. 2010). This requires a focus on the original research question and the ability of researchers to set aside additional questions that may arise for later research studies.

A research team leader will randomly select eligible participants and divided them into two equal groups, A and B. Group A pre-intervention and Group B post intervention. There are multiple delivery methods available for collection data such as interview (one-on-one, via telephone or in person), focus groups, and observation. The traditional method paper-and-pencil survey whose results are subsequently entered into a software program will be used as well as an online based collection to reducing the cost of data collection and encouraging voluntary participants. The data will be electronically downloaded directly to an Excel spreadsheet for analysis and minimizing data entry error or bias. There will be four different types

This study will not be anonymous as it requires us to collect names for the purpose of completing this research. For the purpose of this study, information will remain confidential. To ensure confidentiality, Non-involving persons or agencies will not have access to information collected to ensure confidentiality.

Forty surveys were completed successfully which resulted in very conclusive answers. Before conducting the survey all ethical guidelines were followed: a disclaimer was placed at the start of the survey informing participants that all information will remain confidential; the participants privacy will be respected; there will be no lasting harm and the participants will know this is entirely voluntary as the participant has the freedom to refuse or withdraw at any time without

 Were appropriate procedures used to safeguard the rights of study participants? Was the study subject to external review by an IRB/ethics review board?

The information is presented in a direct manner, lacking unnecessary information, and written in a style which is easy for a range of readers to understand. They provide a thorough description of the development of the instrument, the norm population used, and an example of the survey, thus enabling the study to be replicated. A table of the frequencies and percentages of respondents’

The authors state reliability and validity testing were not completed on the survey questions (Gordon et al., 2014, p.14), and include this as a

Cooper and Schindler (2014) provide examples of important questions to ask when conducting a study. These are mostly related to the collection of data, who collected the data, what were their credentials, when was the data collected, how large was the sample, from where was the sample taken, and so on. These types of questions address the reliability

Data was collected by a single author using a paper data collection form. Information collected included the title and authors of the selected studies and year of publications. The study design, sample population size and inclusion criteria for each of the studies were also collected. Finally, the outcomes assessed as well as the definition of the outcome measures were also collected, along with the results produced in each paper and its conclusion.

The participants were obtained through volunteers from a classroom. There were 26 participants in total, with 8 males, 17 females, and 1 omission. Demographics that were recorded included age, sex, ethnic background, and social economic status. Participants were instructed to avoid adding any extra informative identification to protect their confidentiality as well as informed about their right to withdraw from the study. Participants were then told that the completion of the study will act as giving consent to participate. Upon completion, participants were given a debriefing that included an explanation of the nature of the study along with contact information whether they had any more questions.

Although there may be some invasive procedures, care will be taken to limit as many invasive procedures as possible. All personal information shall be de-identified to ensure participation privacy. Any records that contain information that may be construed as sensitive will be inside a locked a cabinet where only researchers directly involved with the study will have access. All computers will be password protected with individual sign-on names that shall be linked to each researcher. To ensure participation is voluntary, every precaution will be taken to make sure potential participants do not feel intimidated or pressured to enter into the study. If a participant appears undecided on their involvement, researchers shall not coerce them into participation in any way.

There were 523 participants all undergraduates from psyc121 course at Victoria University of Wellington. All participants who gave consent and completed the questionnaire received course credit. This was also approved by the ethics committee and all participation in the study remained anonymous.

The study generated both quantitative and qualitative data. The data was then coded to make it possible to group the responses into categories (Roebuck, 2015). Raw data was then transferred from data gathering tools