David Richardson's Case Summary

But there is a provision under section 206G of Corporation Act, where a directory who is disqualified by court to manage a corporation can again apply to the court for leave to manage a firm. The court has the authority to grant director relief from civil liability if the director has performed honestly and ought to fairly be excused.

The replaceable rule in s 203C provides that, in a proprietary company, a director may be removed and another appointed at the same general meeting by resolution. In this event, there are no specific notice requirements for the removal. However, as SPG and SET are sole shareholder companies, it is necessary to use s 249B, which outlines the proceedings for resolutions of one-member companies. This section states that, when a company only has one shareholder, an ordinary resolution may be passed if the appropriate documentation is recorded and signed, and subsequently lodged with ASIC if necessary.

Ladies and gentlemen of the jury. Today we have a very serious charge before you. We have Dr Richard Kimball, who is before you on the charges of first-degree murder. However, he is not guilty based on our success to provide reasonable doubt that Kimball planned and deliberately kill his wife or that he was provoked into killing his wife in the heat of passion.

Officers responded to North Scott Hall to investigate the report of a 19 year old male UW Oshkosh student checking in with an odor of marijuana on him. The male admitted to smoking marijuana and drinking alcoholic beverages. He was warned for Use of Marijuana and cited for Underage Consumption of Alcoholic Beverages (2nd offense).

During our negotiation with D.G. Barnhouse (DGB), we intend to utilize an integrative bargaining strategy with management. Before coming to this conclusion, we weighed the advantages and disadvantages of a distributive approach, however, we eventually decided to take an integrative and predominantly interest based stance versus a position based stance in our negotiations after assessing internal and external environmental factors. In addition, we settled on this strategy because we ultimately believe that management and the union share at the very least, one fundamental common interest, which is the firm’s financial stability. That being said, even with our plans to use integrative bargaining, we still plan to negotiate assertively to achieve

1. Jacob Herrel (Herrel) was enrolled as a student at Fort Hayes State University (FHSU) for the 2014-2015 academic year.

As I viewed the case of Gary L. Sampson, 41, he can best be described as a man dependent on liquor and cocaine, a miscreant father, and a bank burglar with a long history of brutality. On August 1, 2001, he handed himself over to the Vermont State Police in the wake of escaping from interest for a string of three killings he submitted in Massachusetts and New Hampshire. The individuals who knew Sampson estimated that his homicides were an urgent finale to a pained life. Amid his initial life in New England, he once bound, choked, and beat three elderly ladies in a treat store. He had commandeered autos at knifepoint and was therapeutically analyzed as schizophrenic. In 1977, he wedded a 17-year-old young lady he had impregnated; after two months, he was captured and accused of assault for having "unnatural intercourse with a

P alleges assault and false arrest. P claims he was a guest at a party when MOS arrived and recovered a firearm on the ground. P claims that he was not in possession of a firearm. P alleges that he was falsely arrested for criminal possession of weapon, sprayed with mace, and assaulted by MOS. Defendant MOS states that they were responding to a radio run for shots fired and a vehicle fleeing the scene. While canvassing the area, MOS observed a party in a yard which had very loud music playing and people were drinking in the street. Sgt. Arquer entered the party through the main entrance to shut down the party, and MOS Mayer entered through the side gate. As Sgt. Arquer was speaking to an individual, MOS Mayer observed P walking in his direction

On December 30th, 2015 at 0357 hours Deputy Akins responded to a battery of a family member. When the Deputy arrived on the scene he was approached by Kimberly Corp and Tayia Corp who advised that John Paul Branfield Corp had punched them. Deputy Akins asked the victims to explain in detail what had happened.

Source of payments: The petitioners claim liquidity and the ability to pay interest or principal on amount owed, but conclusive findings show the insufficiency to pay interest or principal balance. This factor supports the treatment of the advances as equity.

Mr. Bates cooperation assisted the government to successfully prosecute co-defendant Jonathan Coleman. Mr. Coleman originally pled not guilty and his case set for jury trial on March 23, 2015. On March 11, 2015, the government sought a superseding indictment adding Mr. Bates as leverage to induced Mr. Coleman to enter into a guilty plea.

After hours, after days, the judges finally decided. Olaf Dietrich was successful, when he testified against the right to a fair trial. The judges decided that his trial was unfair, as instead of being forced to represent himself, the judges should have adjourned the case to enable Dietrich to attempt to find a legal representation. The Dietrich Case was established that all Australians have the right to a fair trial. After this decision was made, it left Dietrich to be given appeal and have his case reheard in Victoria. But he had already served his full sentence. The prosecutor did not want to retrial, as this will cost more time and money and even if Dietrich was found guilty, he had already completed his sentence. The outcome did not only

Zach Porter has been charged with attempted murder. A photo was recovered from Mr. Porter’s apartment. It depicts Mr. Porter posing with a group of known gang members associated with the Krispy Kreme Gang. The photo shows Mr. Porter holding a firearm and Big Boston Cream Mike. It is unknown when or who created the photo.

I feel that Dr. P has a case in this situation. I feel he has the ability to sue for compensatory damages. I would argue that Dr. P is a public figure. As you said he is the foremost academic on exposure to violence and the human psyche. Since he is a public figure and his work is important to public interest. Because of this we have to prove malice. In this case we also have to determine how defamation of DR. P is present. We have to answer how his reputation is being harmed, how his standing in the community is being harmed.

When providing the distinction between the above charges the two stage process of legal characterization developed in Agnew must be applied by the English courts. The object of the first stage of the process is to ascertain the nature of the rights and obligations which the parties intended to grant each other in respect of the charged assets. Once these have been ascertained, the Court can then embark on the second stage of the process, which is one of categorization and designed to attribute the correct legal label to the package of rights and obligations. Lord Millett’s reasoning has been approved by the House of Lords in Re Spectrum in which emphasis was given to the freedom of the company to deal with the assets in the ordinary course of business rather than the two first criteria focusing on the nature of the secured assets.