Daytime Rvalho

It is not what a person says that is important, but instead how they say it. By changing the tone or audience of a work, the purpose can be completely altered. Two articles can have identical information, yet when a different tone is formed between the two, their purposes drastically change. The article “ What Colleges Will Teach in 2025” by Jon Meacham and “ The Failure of American Higher Education” by Robert Atkinson both contain a topic that is similar on many levels. That being said, each article has an entirely different tone and audience, effectively skewing the similarity between their purposes. While Atkinson created a sound argument, his choice of tone and use of audience were far less effective than Meacham’s.

This framework allows public congregation to consider the context's state of scientific knowledge, in academic settings, as well as its second tone of context, in all other settings, as establishing social practices which interconnect contrasting aspects in an intellectual attempt. Audiences with higher educational backgrounds and audiences with general education are not explicitly connected in terms of how well each side develops scientific jargon's essence, so she utilizes textual content found in research articles as well as popularized articles which generates an intertextual process that eradicates the commonly held view that the former is merely a simplified version of the latter. This creates a rhetorical strategic process in terms of how she spawns a larger audience, and appeals to everyone's knowledge attainability. The techniques and writing styles that are implemented in the article are suitable for individuals who bear diverse intellectual

Knowing what an author of an article or any journal entry means is one of the most important part of understanding the authors point. There are numerous ways how this can be achieved. One of the most commonly used methods in the field of communication is through the use of rhetorical analysis. Rhetorical analysis, or what is also sometimes called as rhetorical criticism refers to a process where an individual identifies, analyzes, and then interprets the presence of symbolic artifacts in a particular text or reading, which may include words, images, phrases, ideas, and even discourses, to get the overall meaning of that text or reading. The objective of this paper is to use rhetorical analysis, and the three underlying appeals or concepts namely

It’s easy to say Americans are glued to their technology devices, but you cannot believe everything you read on the internet. Instead, Iyers quotes Nicholas Carr and his facts about the increasing hours of American adults spent online from 2005 to 2009 from his book “The Shallows.” Authority is a key element in persuasion because it gives audience a truthful representation of the author. With the audiences trust in the writer the piece is therefore powerful. Because the piece has a potential to make a differnce with the audience actually listening to the author.

Thesis Statement: Naughton’s overall goal in this article was for the audience to consider both sides of the argument and create their own belief upon the matter by using rhetorical choices such as appealing to expert opinions, statistics used in a poll, the tone and advanced diction.

My academic writing has greatly improved. I now make an active effort to use a thesaurus to vary my language. I also incorporate more transitional phrases to create a better flow in my essays. I organize my paragraphs to make sure the information and supporting evidences flows well. Even though I understood my claims and thesis needed to be supported by credible sources I analyze who and where the source was published. Specifically, the class discussion in the response to videos we watched two videos about high fructose corn syrup. I stated,” The first video, High Fructose Corn Syrup (HFCS) – ‘Party’ TV original commercial, is an advertisement made by The Corn Refiners Association”. I acknowledged that the first video was made by an association that could have biased opinions about high fructose corn syrup. By acknowledging where the source came from I demonstrate that if this video was used for evidence for safe fructose consumption it would not be a credible source because of its ties to the corn association.

While looking at popular article, the first thing that catches your eye is the structure. Stated by authors Linton, Madigan and Johnson “students can learn to observe disciplinary patterns in the ways academic writing is structured”. Structure article can help keep a reader focus and make sure if need, they can reference a certain part of texts. One of the main structure of a popular journal is being able to attract an audience to read their whole article. George Johnson, author of “Unraveling the Ties of Altitude, Oxygen and Lung Cancer” starts his article off by a great introduction. For example, “Epidemiologist have been puzzled by a strange pattern in their data: People living at higher altitudes appear less likely to get lung cancer” (Johnson). This introduction draws reader in who would like to learn more information about how higher altitude can lowering your chance of lung cancer. As one takes a look at the scholar article the structure is a lot different from a newspaper

As writers we provide the information we want our audience to have; as an audience we absorb the information we want to obtain. Everyone’s perception of reality differs due to the way one views the world they live in. The way we report is based on particular facts that we have previously observed and remembered. The Principle of Selection, the Principle of Slanting and Charged Language all work to reach a very similar goal, but differ greatly in definition, use and purpose.

in the scientific field and the need to entice readers, journalists and reporters may convey the wrong

Before you can make your paper appealing to the audience, you have to know who your audience is and why the audience can be important to your paper. “Knowing your audience helps you make decisions about what information you should include, how you should arrange that information, and what kind of supporting details will be necessary for the reader to understand what you are presenting” (“Writing for”).Knowing this information can make your paper so much easier because if you know what your audience is looking for and explaining your topic many people would be interested in your paper. If you don’t know how to arrange a paper to make it revealing it would be very hard for the audience to know what’s going on in your paper. If you want to make your argument appealing you should dissert your readers.

Entman (1993) used and rationalized some examples of hypothetical arguments in regards to the study of mass communication (p. 56). The first example audience autonomy: The most important concept is the notion of a dominant meaning. “From a framing perspective, dominant meaning consists of the problem, causal, evaluative, and treatment interpretations with the highest probability of being noticed, processed, and accepted by the most people” (Entman,1993, p. 56). The dominant meaning is the most common opinion any form of publics has towards the signified. (Entman,1993, p. 56). The next example is the balance, or objectivity a journalist brings to an article. “Journalists may follow the rules for ‘objective’ reporting and yet convey a dominant framing of the news text that prevents most audience members from making a balanced assessment of a situation” (Entman,1993, p. 56). A good journalist will have clarity on the dissimilarities between “including scattered oppositional facts and challenging a dominant frame,” they would be better equipped to create an article that make all issues in the story equally salient (Entman, 1993, p. 57).

There are many differences between articles written for scholars and articles written for popular audiences. According to Anne Johns, the author of “Discourse Communities and Communities of Practice,” there are ten conventions or moves that exist only in academic prose and when violated, author is seen as an outsider of the discourse community. John Swales (“Create a Research Space” (CARS) Model Research Introductions) and Ken Hyland also talk about writing and the similarities between all academic writing in “Create a Research Space” (CARS) Model Research Instructions and “Disciplinary Courses”. Based on research by Swales, Hyland, and Johns on academic writing, and research by Jeanne Fahnestock, Charles Sullivan and Cameron M. Smith on

In this paper, I will be analyzing two types of media: Scientific articles versus socially and politically motivated, biased articles. This paper’s intended audience are my fellow ENC1101 students. This paper will challenge students to do further research then what they see after one search before forming an opinion on a subject. The audience of my paper will be aware of the subject, as the topic has been in the news in ad nauseam over social media, news outlets, newspapers, and personal conversation. I will accomplish my goal of showing similarities and differences between scholarly articles and media with a second agenda by establishing niches, counterclaiming one source with another, and indicating gaps in information.

There are many different types of articles: newspaper articles, journal articles, editorial articles, research articles. Each one of these articles target a different audience. The authors takes into account who will be reading their article and how much knowledge he or she has on the topic being discussed. The style of each of these articles depends on the audience. The comprehensibility of a newspaper article will be much greater than a research journal article written by a scientist. The audience has a large impact on the style, structure, word choice, credibility and understanding of different articles.

The Forum for Applied Research and Public Policy also questions the intent of some news programs, mentioning scientific research asking whether or not they are promoting science or sending out information they do not comprehend, thus generating scientific “noise” (Fitzpatrick 95). All of these are things that have stemmed from the mass broadcasting of an individual's ideas through the media that are picked up by many. But, can we blame the media? For almost everything produced is produced with a target audience in mind, a group of people who want to and are willing to pay for the production of that media source.